[1]SHENG Shutong,LIU Yanfang,LIU Yaolin,et al.Spatial Pattern and Driving Forces of the Synergy and Trade-off of Ecosystem Services in the Coastal Areas of Shandong[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):384-392.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.026]
Copy
Spatial Pattern and Driving Forces of the Synergy and Trade-off of Ecosystem Services in the Coastal Areas of Shandong
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
30
Number of periods:
2023 02
Page number:
384-392
Column:
Public date:
2023-03-10
- Title:
- Spatial Pattern and Driving Forces of the Synergy and Trade-off of Ecosystem Services in the Coastal Areas of Shandong
- Keywords:
- ecosystem services; synergistic trade-offs; multi-scale geographic weighted regression; Shandong coastal areas
- CLC:
- X171; K901
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.026
- Abstract:
- In order to improve the efficiency of regional ecological protection and provide policy basis for scientific decision-making on regional ecological governance, we used the coastal area of Shandong Province as the research area, used the InVEST model and the CASA model to measure the temporal and spatial evolution of water production services, soil conservation, vegetation carbon sequestration, and biodiversity, and used the difference comparison method to explore the temporal and spatial differentiation mechanism of ecosystem service synergy trade-offs, and further used multi-scale geographic weighted regression(MGWR)to analyze the influence of natural factors and human activity factors on synergy trade-offs. The results showed that:(1)in 2018, the average values of water production services and biodiversity in the study area were 605.27 mm/a and 0.28, and the total increasing rates from 2010 to 2018 were 0.21 mm/a and 0.23, respectively; soil conservation and vegetation carbon sequestration were 0.000 73 t/(hm2·a)and 537.56 gC/(m2 ·a), and the total deceleration rates from 2010 to 2018 were 0.62 t/(hm2·a)and 2.1 gC/(m2 ·a), respectively;(2)during the study period, the synergy of ecosystem services had significant spatial heterogeneity; water production services and soil conservation and biodiversity showed strong trade-offs and weak synergy; vegetation carbon sequestration was associated with water production services and soil conservation; biodiversity showed strong synergy and weak trade-offs;(3)there was a correlation among water production services, soil conservation, and vegetation carbon sequestration, which was more affected by natural factors such as slope, elevation, and sunshine hours than human activities, of which positive and negative characteristics and intensity were spatially heterogeneous; the interpretation of the other factors was relatively small and not fixed, and each factor was dynamic and comprehensively affected the changes in the synergy trade-off. In conclusion, the synergy and trade-off of the four ecosystem services in the study area had significant spatial heterogeneity, and the positive and negative factors and intensity of the influencing factors were also spatially heterogeneous, and the results can provide a reference for ecological governance in coastal areas of Shandong Province.
- References:
-
[1] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[2] Costanza R, D Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment's. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends[M]. Washington D C: Island Press,2005.
[4] 郑华,欧阳志云,赵同谦,等.人类活动对生态系统服务功能的影响[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(1):118-126.
[5] 张碧天,闵庆文,焦雯珺,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5517-5532.
[6] Thomas S, Gaby D, Olivier G, et al. Environmental impact assessment and monetary ecosystem service valuation of an ecosystem under different future environmental change and management scenarios: a case study of a Scots pine forest[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016,173:79-94.
[7] 苗培培,赵祖军,赵筱青,等.云南典型石漠化区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):366-374.
[8] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[9] Rodríguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1).DOI:10,5751/ES-01667-110128.
[10] Hoyer R, Chang H J. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the Tualatin and Yamhill basins under climate change and urbanization[J]. Applied Geography, 2014,53:402-416.
[11] 朱殿珍,初磊,马帅,等.青藏高原生态屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):308-315.
[12] 刘华超,任春颖,王宗明,等.大兴安岭生态功能区生态系统服务功能动态及权衡协同关系研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(5):587-598.
[13] 孙艺杰,任志远,郝梦雅,等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素:以延安市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3443-3454.
[14] 张紫怡,刘艳芳,张扬,等.生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间响应:以福建省生态功能区为例[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2022,47(1):111-125.
[15] 李理,赵芳,朱连奇,等.淇河流域生态系统服务权衡及空间分异机制的地理探测[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7568-7578.
[16] Termorshuizen J W, Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development[J]. Landcsape Ecology, 2009,24:1037-1052.
[17] Jin G, Chen K, Liao T, et al. Measuring ecosystem services based on government intentions for future land use in Hubei Province: implications for sustainable landscape management[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021,36:2025-2042.
[18] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[19] Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,257.DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120454.
[20] 刘洋,毕军,吕建树.生态系统服务权衡与协同关系及驱动力::以江苏省太湖流域为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7067-7078.
[21] Schuur E A G. Productivity and global climate revisited: the sensitivity of tropical forest growth to precipitation[J]. Ecology, 2003,84(5):1165-1170.
[22] 马慧强,杨俊,李哲.太原市城市复合生态系统调节服务时空格局演化及驱动机制研究[J].地理科学,2021,41(3):463-472.
[23] 张宇硕,吴殿廷.京津冀地区生态系统服务权衡的多尺度特征与影响因素解析[J].地域研究与开发,2019,38(3):141-147.
[24] 潘竟虎,李真.干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17):280-289.
[25] 宫萌.山东省围填海演进过程及其对自然岸线资源的影响[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2020.
[26] Chen Z Q, Yu B L, Yang C S, et al. An Extended Time Series(2000—2018)of Global NPP-ⅦRS-Like Nighttime Light Data from a Cross-Sensor Calibration[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021,13(3):889-906.
[27] 金贵,王占岐,姚小薇,等.国土空间分区的概念与方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(5):48-53.
[28] Richard S, Rebecca C K, Spencer W, et al. InVEST3.2.0 User's Guide[M]. Stanford University:The Natural Capital Project,2017.
[29] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B, et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993,7(4):811-841.
[30] Zhu W, Pan Y, He H, et al. Simulation of maximum light use efficiency for some typical vegetation types in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006,51(4):457-463.
[31] Reyers B. Incorporating anthropogenic threats into evaluations of regional biodiversity and prioritisation of conservation areas in the Limpopo Province, South Africa[J]. Biological Conservation, 2004,118(4):521-531.
[32] Yu H, Fotheringham A S, Li Z, et al. Inference in multiscale geographically weighted regression[J]. Geographical Analysis, 2019,52(1):87-106.
[33] Fang L L, Wang L C, Chen W X, et al. Identifying the impacts of natural and human factors on ecosystem service in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,314.DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127995.
[34] Onainnia M, De Manuel B F, Madariaga L, et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013,289:1-9.
[35] 王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2023-03-10