PDF Download

[1]CHEN Fengfeng,ZHAO Jiangping,CHEN Yunming.Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Typical Young Plantations in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(01):190-196.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220511.001]

Copy

Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Typical Young Plantations in Loess Hilly Region

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 01 Page number: 190-196 Column: Public date: 2023-01-10

Title:: Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Typical Young Plantations in Loess Hilly Region

Author(s):: CHEN Fengfeng^1,3, ZHAO Jiangping¹, CHEN Yunming^1,2; (1.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 2.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 3.Xifeng management supervision of soil and water conservation in the Yellow River, YRCC, MWR, Xifeng, Gansu 745000, China)

Keywords:: Pinus tabulaeformis; Robinia pseudoacacia; Syzygium aromaticum; soil moisture; temporal and spatial changes; temporal stability; loess hilly area

CLC:: S152.7⁺5

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220511.001

Abstract:: In order to clarify the temporal and spatial changes of soil moisture in typical young plantations in loess hilly areas, soil moisture and meteorological data were collected through using the ECH₂O soil moisture monitoring system and the standard runoff plot slope surface soil moisture observation method, and the soil moisture status and time stability of abandoned land and different types of young plantations were analyzed. The results show that:(1)compared with abandoned land, the soil moisture content of young plantation is generally lower, and has obvious seasonal change characteristics, and the change trend is basically the same, all of which increase or decrease with the increase or decrease of precipitation;(2)the vertical distribution of soil moisture in different types of plantations is quite different; compared with abandoned land, Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis forests have lower soil moisture at a depth of 50 cm, and high soil moisture at a depth of 80—120 cm; the soil moisture of young lilac forest is relatively low as a whole;(3)the representative depths of soil moisture of Pinus tabulaeformis and abandoned land are 120 cm and 80 cm, respectively; the evaluation of the results based on the coefficient of determination(R²≥0.9)and the Nash coefficient(NSE≥-0.1)show that the selection of the representative depth of soil moisture is acceptable, and the soil moisture of different depths of Robinia pseudoacacia and Syzygium aromaticum is quite different. These research results suggest that in loess hilly areas, young plantations significantly affect the vertical distribution of soil moisture, and the overall soil moisture content is low. Compared with abandoned land, the soil moisture variability of Robinia pseudoacacia and Syzygium aromaticum is greater, whereas the soil moisture variability of Pinus tabulaeformis is more stable.

References:: [1] 马婧怡,贾宁凤和程曼.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤水分变化特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(10):3471-3481.
[2] Berndtsson R, Nodomi K, Yasuda H, et al. Soil water and temperature patterns in an arid desert dune sand[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996,185(1/4):221-240.
[3] 常译方,毕华兴,高路博,等.晋西黄土区刺槐和油松林地土壤水分动态变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(4):21-27.
[4] 张建军,李慧敏和徐佳佳.黄土高原水土保持林对土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):72-82.
[5] Liu S L, Dong Y H, Li D, et al. Effects of different terrace protection measures in a sloping land consolidation project targeting soil erosion at the slope scale[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013,53:46-53.
[6] 邵明安,贾小旭,王云强,等.黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2016,31(1):14-22.
[7] 刘庚,牛俊杰,朱炜歆,等.晋西北黄土丘陵区人工林地土壤水分亏缺评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):309-314.
[8] 高思远.晋西黄土区典型人工林地土壤水分动态及对降雨的响应[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.
[9] 李菲.典型喀斯特山区不同植被类型土壤水分动态变化及其对植物光合作用的响应[D].贵州:贵州师范大学,2016.
[10] 丁聪,王冬梅,贺康宁,等.黄土高寒区坡面土壤水分的时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):155-164.
[11] 王舒,马岚,张栋,等.晋西黄土区不同林龄人工刺槐林下植被及土壤水分特征[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,52(3):253-258.
[12] Vachaud G A, Silans A, Balabanis P, et al. Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function1[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1985,49(4):822-828.
[13] Zhao D Y, Peth S, Wang X Y, et al. Controls of surface soil moisture spatial patterns and their temporal stability in a semi-arid steppe[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010,24(18):2507-2519.
[14] Dari J, Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, et al. Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture:Addressing the monitoring at the catchment scale[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019,570:436-444.
[15] 马文,韩晓阳,刘文兆,等.黄土塬区深剖面土壤水分垂直分布特征及其时间稳定性[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):430-438.
[16] 尚爱军,卜耀军,艾海舰,等.榆林沙区土壤水分时空格局及动态变化规律研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(4):86-89.
[17] 王俊,刘文兆和胡梦珺.黄土丘陵区小流域土壤水分时空变异[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(6):71-77.
[18] 殷地迟,王立,蔡国军,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区不同植被类型的土壤水分特征及其稳定性[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):65-71.
[19] 陈维梁,王树学,齐统祥,等.黄土丘陵区不同恢复年限人工刺槐林土壤水分时空动态及其时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5643-5657.
[20] 张川, 张伟, 陈洪松,等.喀斯特典型坡地旱季表层土壤水分时空变异性[J].生态学报,2015,35(19):6326-6334.
[21] 杜波. WEPP模型在岩溶石漠化地区适用性评价:以关岭享乐小流域为例[D].贵州:贵州大学,2017.
[22] 孔凌霄,毕华兴,周巧稚,等.晋西黄土区不同立地刺槐林土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):163-169.
[23] 王艳莉,刘立超,高艳红,等.人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态及空间分布[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):942-950.
[24] 杨启红,陈丽华,张富,等.土壤水分变异对降雨和植被的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(S2):88-94.
[25] 马文.黄土丘陵区典型人工林土壤水分补给与消耗特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.
[26] 张晶晶和王力.黄土高原高塬沟壑区坡面表层土壤水分研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):93-97.
[27] 赵刚,樊廷录,李尚中,等.黄土旱塬区苹果园土壤水分动态[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(4):1199-1204.
[28] 席本野,张瑞娜,邸楠,等.树木吸收利用深层土壤水的特征与机制:对人工林培育的启示[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(9):885-905.
[29] 赵亚楠,周玉蓉和王红梅.宁夏东部荒漠草原灌丛引入下土壤水分空间异质性[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):3577-3586.
[30] 丁聪,王冬梅,贺康宁,等.黄土高寒区坡面土壤水分的时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):155-164.
[31] Percy M S, Riveros-Iregui D A, Mirus B B, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of shallow soil moisture across four planar hillslopes on a tropical ocean island, San Cristóbal, Galápagos[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2020,30:100692.
[32] Jacobs J M, Mohanty B P, Hsu E C, et al. SMEX02: Field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil moisture[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004,92(4):436-446.
[33] Qiu Y, Fu B, Wang J, et al. Spatial variability of soil moisture content and its relation to environmental indices in a semi-arid gully catchment of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2001,49(4):723-750.
[34] 宋坤,潘晓星和穆立蔷.6种草本植物根系土壤抗冲性[J].国土与自然资源研究,2013,28(3):84-85.
[35] 陈晓莹,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原两种类型土壤的水分动态对比[J].应用生态学报2020,31(5):1560-1570.
[36] Hu W, Shao M, Reichardt K. Using a new criterion to identify sites for mean soil water storage evaluation[J]. Soil Ence Society of America Journal, 2010,74(3):762-773.
[37] Zhang B, Cadotte M W, Chen S, et al. Plants alter their vertical root distribution rather than biomass allocation in response to changing precipitation[J]. Ecology, 2019,100(11):1-10.
[38] Cassel D K, Wendroth O, Nielsen D R. Assessing spatial variability in an agricultural experiment station field:Opportunities arising from spatial dependence[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000,92(4):706-714.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-01-10