[1]AN Siwen,MA Caihong,HUA Yuqi,et al.Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value Profit and Loss Under the Oasis Development Model of the Ecological Fragile Area in the Upper Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):375-382.
Copy
Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value Profit and Loss Under the Oasis Development Model of the Ecological Fragile Area in the Upper Yellow River
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
29
Number of periods:
2022 06
Page number:
375-382
Column:
Public date:
2022-10-20
- Title:
- Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value Profit and Loss Under the Oasis Development Model of the Ecological Fragile Area in the Upper Yellow River
- Keywords:
- land use change; ecological service value; ecological-production-living space; evolution characteristics; Hongsibu District
- CLC:
- F301.2; X171
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the impact of development patterns on ecosystem service value(ESV)of oasis irrigation areas in the upper reaches of the Yellow River, Hongsibu District of Ningxia was selected as the research area. Based on Landsat TM and GF-2 remote sensing image data sources, the benefits and losses of ecosystem service value were quantitatively analysed by revising ecosystem service equivalent factors. The results showed that:(1)Since the first group of migrants from the southern mountainous areas of Ningxia moved into Hongsibu District at the end of 1998 and started the oasis development mode, the area of Hongsibu irrigated area continued to expand, reaching 5.17×104 hm2 by 2018, forming a desert oasis distribution pattern.(2)Oasis development significantly changed the land use structure in Hongsibu District, with the decrease of dry land, other grassland and unused land, and the increase of irrigated land, forest land and construction land, forming a ‘production-ecological' spatial pattern with oasis as living space and production space, in addition to surrounding ecological space.(3)From 1990 to 2018, ESV of Hongsibu District increased from 1.151×109 yuan to 2.267×109 yuan, which was mainly due to the expansion of forest, grassland, water and other ecological land. Each single service value showed a rising trend, and the ecological construction achieved remarkable results.(4)The total amount of ESV in Hongsibu District showed obvious stage characteristics, among which, decreased from 1990 to 2000, and then continued to increase. From 1990 to 2000, the expansion of dry land resulted in the imbalance of forest, grassland, useable land, ecological degradation and ESV loss of 2.9×107 yuan. From 2000 to 2018, ESV increased by 1.116×109 yuan, in which the rapid expansion of urban construction land was the main cause of ESV loss, while the expansion of forest, grassland and water area was the main cause of ESV increase. So Hongsibu District has achieved remarkable achievements in ecological construction in the process of oasis development, but there are also some cases of ESV loss due to development. In future development, it is necessary to further enhance the synergistic development capacity of the three aspects of society, economy and ecology.
- References:
-
[1] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(5):441-446.
[2] 戴培超,张绍良,刘润,等.生态系统文化服务研究进展:基于Web of Science分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(5):1863-1875.
[3] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[4] Costanza R, Groot R D, Stephen F, et al. The values of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253-260.
[5] 金贵,吴锋,李兆华,等.快速城镇化地区土地利用及生态效率测算与分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(23):8048-8057.
[6] Luo Q L, Zhou J F, Li Z G, et al. Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,725,138452.
[7] 刘芳,于凯,张金玲,等.新疆准东露天煤矿土地利用时空变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态经济,2021,37(9):169-175.
[8] Cai E X, Jing Y, Liu Y L, et al. Spatial-temporal patterns and driving forces of Ecological-Living-Production land in Hubei Province, Central China[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(1):66-81.
[9] 刘莹,耿文亮,邵静文,等.“三生空间”视角下土地利用变化与生态系统服务价值响应:以黄河下游地区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2021,40(4):129-135.
[10] Schirpke U, Tscholl S, Tasser E. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service values: Effects of land-use changes from past to future(1860—2100)[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,272:111068.
[11] 韩增林,赵文祯,闫晓露,等.基于生态系统服务价值损益的生态安全格局演变分析:以辽宁沿海瓦房店市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(22):8370-8382.
[12] 刘瑞清,李加林,何改丽,等.浙江省绿地系统时空变化特征及生态损益评价[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(10):3119-3129.
[13] 南箔,杨子寒,毕旭,等.生态系统服务价值与人类活动的时空关联分析:以长江中游华阳河湖群地区为例[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(9):3531-3541.
[14] 王庭辉,王喜,秦耀辰,等.丹江口库区生态系统服务价值与人类活动时空关联分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(2):330-341.
[15] 李理,朱文博,李艳红,等.基于地形梯度特征淇河流域生态系统服务价值损益[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):287-295.
[16] 冯源,朱建华,曾立雄,等.县域土地利用变化下生态系统服务价值损益预测:以重庆市巴南区为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(9):3381-3393.
[17] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[18] 周寒冰,王志泰,王志杰,等.喀斯特山地城市生态系统服务价值地形梯度响应:以贵阳市中心城区为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):337-347.
[19] 程广斌,琚小倩.基于RS和GIS技术的生态系统服务价值对土地利用变化的响应:以乌鲁木齐城市圈为例[J].生态经济,2021,37(7):169-175.
[20] 卢周扬帆,许端阳,张绪教,等.阿拉善干旱荒漠区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):296-302.
[21] 张学斌,罗君,石培基,等.格网尺度下张掖生态系统服务价值时空演变及地形梯度分异特征[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(2):543-553.
[22] 李子君,刘金玉,姜爱霞,等.基于土地利用的祊河流域生态系统服务价值动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):269-275,283.
[23] Pan N H, Guan Q Y, Wang Q Z, et al. Spatial differentiation and driving mechanisms in ecosystem service value of arid region: A case study in the middle and lower reaches of Shule River Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,319:128718.
[24] 苗红,贾菲,耿一睿,等.宁夏生态移民安置区人地耦合系统脆弱性分析[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(3):796-806.
[25] 谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[26] 肖建设,乔斌,陈国茜,等.黄河源区玛多县土地利用和生态系统服务价值的演变[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):510-521.
[27] 安斯文,马彩虹,袁倩颖,等.生态移民区“三生”用地变化对生态系统服务的影响:以宁夏红寺堡区为例[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(6):1836-1846.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2022-10-20