PDF Download

[1]HUANG Zhilei,ZHU Wenjun,QI Shanzhong.Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Reserve Available Land Resources of the Yellow River Downstream in the Past 30 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):276-282.

Copy

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Reserve Available Land Resources of the Yellow River Downstream in the Past 30 Years

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 05 Page number: 276-282 Column: Public date: 2022-08-20

Title:: Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Reserve Available Land Resources of the Yellow River Downstream in the Past 30 Years

Author(s):: HUANG Zhilei, ZHU Wenjun, QI Shanzhong; (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

Keywords:: reserve available land resources; reserve available construction land; reserve available cultivated land; Jinan City

CLC:: F301.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The Yellow River Basin is the implementation area of ecological protection and high-quality development strategy. The evaluation of available land resources is of great significance to the territorial and spatial planning and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Based on the remote sensing data from 1990 to 2020 extracting land use data, DEM and slope information, using reserve available land resource evaluation method, exploring the temporal and spatial evolution trend of reserve available land resources along the Yellow River in Jinan City during the past 30 years, analyzing the regional orientation of the use of reserve land resources in different regions. The results indicate that:(1)the reserve suitable construction land area in Jinan City was 292.48 km² and was decreasing and mostly in the southern part of the study area, among which Licheng District and Changqing District had the highest reserve construction land potential, and the area of reserved construction land in Tianqiao, Licheng, and Shizhong Districts had significantly changed, the area change was 13.97 km², -13.84 km², -9.66 km², respectively;(2)Jinan City had the large potential of reserved cultivated land(360.67 km²), and the spatial distribution pattern was similar to the reserved construction land; the changing magnitude decreased in the order: Licheng, Tianqiao, Shizhong, Changqing, Huaiyin, and Lixia Districts, among which Licheng and Changqing Districts had the highest reserve cultivated land potential;(3)based on the overlap and differences of the two types of land, and regional socio-economic development and natural environmental conditions, it can be seen that the reserve land resources in the southern Tianqiao District, Changqing District and northern Huaiyin District, Shizhong District, and Lixia District of Jinan City can be converted into construction land, and the reserve land resources in the central and southern parts of Licheng District and the central and southeastern parts of Changqing District can be converted into new cultivated land.

References:: [1] 王晓楠,孙威.黄河流域资源型城市转型效率及其影响因素[J].地理科学进展2020,39(10):1643-1655.
[2] 何凡能,李美娇,肖冉.中美过去300年土地利用变化比较[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):297-307.
[3] 王洁,摆万奇,田国行.土地利用生态风险评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(3):576-585.
[4] 刘宇辉.中国1961—2001年人地协调度演变分析:基于生态足迹模型的研究[J].经济地理,2005,25(2):219-222,235.
[5] Yang Yu, Li Xiaoyun, Dong Wen, et al. Assessing China's human-environment relationship [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(8):1261-1283.
[6] 徐小任.基于人类拓居模式的土地资源承载力评价方法及应用研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2017.
[7] 徐勇,汤青,樊杰,等.主体功能区划可利用土地资源指标项及其算法[J].地理研究,2010,29(7):1223-1232.
[8] Kim C S, Sandretto C, Uri N D. The impact of incorrectly estimating factor productivity in agriculture on the environment and human health[J]. Environmental Geology, 1999,37(1/2):47-53.
[9] 冷疏影,李秀彬.土地质量指标体系国际研究的新进展[J].地理学报,1999,54(2):177-185.
[10] Tisdell C. Economic indicators to assess the sustainability of conservation farming projects:an evaluation[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 1996,57(2):117-131.
[11] 彭建,王仰麟,宋治倩,等.国内外土地持续利用评价研究进展[J].资源科学,2003,25(2):85-93.
[12] Hurni H. Assessing sustainable land management(SLM)[J] Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2000,81(2):83-92.
[13] 张起明,林小惠,胡梅,等.江西省可利用土地资源空间分布特征分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(12):135-138.
[14] 高志强,刘纪远,庄大方.中国土地资源生态环境背景与利用程度的关系[J].地理学报,1998,53(S1):36-43.
[15] 张凤荣,郭力娜,关小克,等.生态安全观下耕地后备资源评价指标体系探讨[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(9):4-8,14.
[16] 易玲,张增祥,汪潇,等.近30年中国主要耕地后备资源的时空变化[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(6):1-12.
[17] Xu Yong, Tang Qing, Fan Jie, et al. Assessing construction land potential and its spatial pattern in China[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2011,103(2):207-216.
[18] 周艺,徐晨娜,王世新,等.丝绸之路经济带中国段后备可利用水土资源空间分布格局研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(9):1328-1338.
[19] 刘金勇,孔繁花,尹海伟,等.济南市土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1231-1236.
[20] 王恳,李新举.城镇化背景下济南市土地利用变化驱动机制分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,11(S1):151-155.
[21] 王筱明.生态位适宜度评价模型在退耕还林决策中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(8):113-116.
[22] 王敏,董金玮,郑新奇.土地规划环境影响评价指标体系的构建[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):142-144,147.
[23] 徐勇,杨波,刘国彬,等.黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟[J].地理学报,2008,63(11):1218-1226.
[24] 徐小任,王梁,徐勇,等.基于“3类”空间的后备可利用土地资源评价研究:以山西省介休市为例[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(2):272-282.
[25] 席振鑫,刘兆德,刘金花.济南市城镇化与城市土地利用效益耦合协调发展研究[J].资源开发与市场,2019,35(11):1375-1380.
[26] 王成新,窦旺胜,程钰,等.快速城市化阶段济南城市空间扩展及驱动力研究[J].地理科学,2020,40(9):1513-1521.
[27] 李红娟.基于紧凑城市发展的土地利用政策研究[D].济南:山东大学,2017.
[28] 杨树佳,郑新奇.济南市土地利用现状与可持续发展研究[J].资源开发与市场,2006,22(5):438-439,443.
[29] 闫业超,孙希华,李平.水资源对区域社会经济发展的支撑能力研究:以济南市长清区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(1):135-140.
[30] 刘兆霞,皇传华,杨克俊,等.发展中城市的土地资源承载力评价及预测:以济南市为例[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(7):217-223.
[31] 张波,郑新奇.济南市土地可持续利用研究[J].地域研究与开发,2001,20(4):56-58.
[32] 郑亚运,赵清,黄巧华,等.济南市南部山区土地利用变化与地形因子关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):149-153,160.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-08-20