PDF Download

[1]SU Shiping,LIU Xiaoe,LI Yi.Soil Infiltration Characteristics Under Four Shrub Types in Southern and Northern Mountains of Lanzhou City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):149-154,163.

Copy

Soil Infiltration Characteristics Under Four Shrub Types in Southern and Northern Mountains of Lanzhou City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 05 Page number: 149-154,163 Column: Public date: 2022-08-20

Title:: Soil Infiltration Characteristics Under Four Shrub Types in Southern and Northern Mountains of Lanzhou City

Author(s):: SU Shiping, LIU Xiaoe, LI Yi; (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Keywords:: southern and northern mountains of Lanzhou City; shrub; soil infiltration characteristics; soil physical and chemical properties

CLC:: S714.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Soil infiltration characteristics including initial infiltration, stable infiltration, average infiltration and accumulative water quantity were studied under four different shrub types including Platycladus orientalis cv. sieboldii,Reaumuria soongorica, Caragana rosea and Tamarix chinensis in southern and northern mountains of Lanzhou City based on double ring infiltration method. The results showed that soil infiltration characteristics decreased with the increase of soil depth in the 0—80 cm soil layers; the soil infiltration characteristics under different forest types were in the following order: C. rosea>R. soongorica>P. orientalis cv. sieboldii>T. chinensis, while the order was the same among shrubs using principal component analysis. The Horton infiltration model gave the best performance on the infiltrating processes in the four shrub types, followed by Common empirical, Philip and the Kostiakov model. Correlation analysis between soil infiltration characteristics and soil physical and chemical properties showed that soil infiltration characteristics had extremely significant positive correlations with total porosity, soil organic matter, soil total nitrogen, mineral nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, and had significant positive correlations with soil water content, noncapillary porosity, and had significant negative correlation with soil bulk density. Based on the correlation analyses, nine factors which have extremely significant or significant effect on soil infiltration capability were selected. These research results may be useful for providing a theoretical basis for the selection of tree species in the construction of artificial forests in the northern and southern mountains of Lanzhou City.

References:: [1] 张昌顺,范少辉,官凤英,等.闽北毛竹林的土壤渗透性及其影响因子[J].林业科学,2009,45(1):36-42.
[2] 赵洋毅,王玉杰,王云琦,等.渝北水源区水源涵养林构建模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(15):4162-4172.
[3] 孙昌平,刘贤德,雷蕾,等.祁连山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):68-72,77.
[4] 张伟,杨新兵,张汝松,等.冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):208-212.
[5] Ampoorter E, Nevel L V, Vos B D, et al. Assessing the effects of initial soil chara-cteristics, machine mass and traffic intensity on forest soil compaction[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010,260:1664-1676.
[6] 王勤,张宗应,徐小牛.安徽大别山库区不同林分类型的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):59-62.
[7] 吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18,78.
[8] 吴长文,王礼先.林地土壤的入渗及其模拟分析[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(1):71-75.
[9] 王玉杰,王云琦.重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤入渗特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):193-195.
[10] 杨海龙,朱金兆,毕立东.三峡库区森林流域生态系统土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):63-65,69.
[11] 吴庆龙.兰州南北两山绿化造林工程的适宜性分析[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(3):134-136.
[12] 景阳.浅析兰州市气候资源与自然资源的特点和利用[J].农业科技与信息,2015(16):40-42.
[13] 武田英文,何存成,泽田智志,等.兰州市南北两山造林树种的生长过程解析[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(4):832-836.
[14] 张万儒,许本彤.森林土壤定位研究方法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.
[15] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
[16] 秦华军,何丙辉,赵旋池,等.西南喀斯特山地林下经济模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(11):1386-1394.
[17] Murray C D, Buttle J M. Infiltration and soil water mixing on forested and harvested slopes during spring snowmelt, Turkey lakes watershed, central Ontario[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005,306(1/4):1-20.
[18] 刘广路,范少辉,漆良华,等.不同类型毛竹林土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(6):44-46,56.
[19] 漆良华,张旭东,周金星,等.湘西北小流域典型植被恢复群落土壤贮水量与入渗特性[J].林业科学,2007,43(4):1-8.
[20] 周卫卫,余雪标,王旭,等.海南3种典型森林土壤蓄水和渗透能力比较研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(14):6789-6792.
[21] 吕刚,顾宇书,魏忠平,等.白石砬子自然保护区几种主要植被类型土壤入渗特性研究[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(5):780-786.
[22] 王磊,孙长忠,周彬.北京九龙山不同结构侧柏人工纯林降水的再分配[J].林业科学研究,2016,29(5):752-758.
[23] 郭子武,俞文仙,陈双林,等.林地覆盖对雷竹林土壤微生物特征及其与土壤养分制约性关系的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5623-5630.
[24] 李建兴,何丙辉,梅雪梅,等.紫色土区坡耕地不同种植模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(3):725-731.
[25] 王清奎,田鹏,孙兆林,等.森林土壤有机质研究的现状与挑战[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(11):3829-3843.
[26] 林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):33-36.
[27] 王纪杰,俞元春,陈容,等.不同栽培代次、林龄的桉树人工林土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):78-82,103.
[28] 李文凤,张晓平,梁爱珍,等.不同耕作方式下黑土的渗透特性和优先流特征[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(7):1506-1510.
[29] 丁奠元,冯浩,赵英,等.氨化秸秆还田对土壤孔隙结构的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(3):650-658.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-08-20