PDF Download

[1]QIU Guoqiang,NIU Qian,WU Zhenhua,et al.Spatial Evaluate and Heterogeneity Analysis of Land Use Conflict in Su-Xi-Chang Urban Agglomeration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):400-406+414.

Copy

Spatial Evaluate and Heterogeneity Analysis of Land Use Conflict in Su-Xi-Chang Urban Agglomeration

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 04 Page number: 400-406+414 Column: Public date: 2022-06-20

Title:: Spatial Evaluate and Heterogeneity Analysis of Land Use Conflict in Su-Xi-Chang Urban Agglomeration

Author(s):: QIU Guoqiang^1,3, NIU Qian¹, WU Zhenhua², GUO Shanshan¹, QIN Lin¹, WANG Yinghong³; (1.School of Public Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2.School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China)

Keywords:: space conflict; landscape index; conflict measure model; Su-Xi-Chang urban agglomeration

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to explore the impact of urban construction land expansion on land use conflict, Su-Xi-Chang urban agglomeration was taken as the research area to analyze the temporal and spatial characteristics of land use conflict by calculating indices of the spatial external pressure, vulnerability and stability. Based on the inverted ‘U-shaped' theory, space conflicts were classified into four types: stable control, basic control, basic out of control and serious out of control. The results show that:(1)over the past 30 years, the overall level of spatial conflict in Su-Xi-Chang area was in a controllable state, but the intensity of conflict showed an upward trend, with the average conflict index increasing from 0.269 in 1990 to 0.418 in 2018, nearly 1.55 times;(2)there were differences in spatial conflict intensity among different land use types; specifically, the spatial conflict level of forest, grassland and water area was low, while that of construction land was high and the state of out of control increased by 14.3% during the study period, showing a trend of further intensification and diffusion;(3)there was a spatial correlation between land use conflicts; the high-value areas concentrated in the central areas of Suzhou, Wuxi and Changzhou, as well as Jiangyin, Zhangjiagang, Changshu and Kunshan, while the low-value areas mainly distributed in the mountains and waters of Liyang City. This study can provide theoretical reference for effectively identifying land use conflicts and optimizing regional development patterns in Su-Xi-Chang urban agglomeration.

References:: [1] 于伯华,吕昌河.土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(3):106-115.
[2] Liu Y S, Li Y H. Revitalize the world's countryside[J]. Nature, 2017,548(7667):275-277.
[3] 龙花楼,屠爽爽.论乡村重构[J].地理学报,2017,72(4):563-576.
[4] 邹利林,刘彦随,王永生.中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(2):298-309.
[5] Andrew J S. Potential application of mediation to land use conflicts in small-scale mining[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2003,11(2):117-130.
[6] Pavón D, Ventura M, Ribas A, et al. Land use change and socio-environmental conflict in the Alt Empordàcounty(Catalonia, Spain)[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2003,54(3):543-552.
[7] Groot R D. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005,75(3):175-186.
[8] Adam Y O, Pretzsch J, Darr D. Land use conflicts in central Sudan:Perception and local coping mechanisms[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,42:1-6.
[9] Delgado-matas C, Mola-yudego B, Gritten D, et al. Land use evolution and management under recurrent conflict conditions: Umbundu agroforestry system in the Angolan Highlands[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,42:460-470.
[10] 李俏,吴秀芹,王曼曼.荒漠化地区县级潜在土地利用冲突识别[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2018,54(3):616-624.
[11] 周德,徐建春,王莉.近15年来中国土地利用冲突研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(2):21-29.
[12] 李玉恒,刘彦随.中国城乡发展转型中资源与环境问题解析[J].经济地理,2013,33(1):61-65.
[13] 刘彦随.中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设[J].地理学报,2007,62(6):563-570.
[14] 王秋兵,郑刘平,边振兴,等.沈北新区潜在土地利用冲突识别及其应用[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(15):185-192.
[15] 彭佳捷,周国华,唐承丽,等.基于生态安全的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1507-1519.
[16] 王检萍,余敦,卢一乾,等.基于“三生”适宜性的县域土地利用冲突识别与分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1238-1251.
[17] 代亚强,陈伟强,高涵,等.基于用地倾向性评价的农村潜在土地利用冲突识别研究:以西峡县东坪村为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(10):2410-2418.
[18] 黄安,许月卿,卢龙辉,等.“生产—生活—生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(3):503-518.
[19] 杨远琴,任平,洪步庭.基于生态安全的三峡库区重庆段土地利用冲突识别[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(2):322-332.
[20] 蒙吉军,江颂,拉巴卓玛,等.基于景观格局的黑河中游土地利用冲突时空分析[J].地理科学,2020,40(9):1553-1562.
[21] 廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833.
[22] 刘贵利,严奉天,许顺才,等.城市发展中内外空间冲突与协调的战略选择:以石家庄市为例[J].地理研究,2006,25(4):701-709.
[23] 裴彬,潘韬.土地利用系统动态变化模拟研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(9):1060-1066.
[24] 周国华,彭佳捷.空间冲突的演变特征及影响效应:以长株潭城市群为例[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(6):717-723.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-06-20