PDF Download

[1]CAO Can,Sun Rui,WU Zhixiang,et al.Responses of Streamflow to Land Use/Cover Changes in Nandu River Basin Based on SWAT Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):167-175.

Copy

Responses of Streamflow to Land Use/Cover Changes in Nandu River Basin Based on SWAT Model

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 04 Page number: 167-175 Column: Public date: 2022-06-20

Title:: Responses of Streamflow to Land Use/Cover Changes in Nandu River Basin Based on SWAT Model

Author(s):: CAO Can^1,2, Sun Rui^2,3, WU Zhixiang^2,3, LI Qian¹; (1.School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China; 2.Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China; 3.Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Danzhou, Hainan 571737, China)

Keywords:: LUCC; streamflow response; SWAT model; Nandu River Basin; Hainan Island

CLC:: P333

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to explore the hydrological effects of land use/cover change(LUCC)in tropical island watersheds, taking the Nandu River Basin, a typical tropical island basin in Hainan Island, China, as the study area, we constructed a localized soil and water assessment tool(SWAT model)to simulate the hydrological process and its response to LUCC, with an aim to reveal the changes of streamflow. The streamflow effects of LUCC could be explored in typical tropical island basin. The hydrological processes and storage capacity of different land use types were compared. The results were summarized as follows. The SWAT model had good applicability in the Nandu River Basin. Streamflow simulation based on the SWAT model was sensitive to vegetation evapotranspiration, slope conditions, soil conditions and groundwater processes. The order of contribution of different land use types to streamflow generation in the basin was tillage land, other forest land and rubber plantation. The strongest flow yield capacity of tillage land was found, while a certain interception and water storage effect were found in other forest land and rubber plantation. To sum up, compared with 1990, the river streamflow decreased in 2015 in Nandu River Basin. The decrease of surface runoff caused by LUCC was the direct reason for the decrease of streamflow, while the increase of evapotranspiration was the main reason for the decrease of surface runoff.

References:: [1] 荣易,秦成新,杜鹏飞,等.基于模型研究质量评价的SWAT模型参数取值特征分析[J].环境科学,2021,42(6):2769-2777.
[2] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998,34(1):73-89.
[3] 史晓亮,李颖,严登华,等.流域土地利用/覆被变化对水文过程的影响研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(4):301-308.
[4] 祖拜代·木依布拉,师庆东,普拉提·莫合塔尔,等.基于SWAT模型的乌鲁木齐河上游土地利用和气候变化对径流的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(14):5149-5157.
[5] 何孟铮,李宏伟,刘杨,等.顾及土地利用类型的大坡岭流域水文响应模拟研究[J].水电能源科学,2021,39(5):17-20.
[6] 刘磊,邹进,陈欣,等.土地利用变化对云龙水库流域径流的影响[J].贵州大学学报:自然科学版,2021,38(5):33-39.
[7] 李帅,魏虹,刘媛,等.气候与土地利用变化下宁夏清水河流域径流模拟[J].生态学报,2017,37(4):1252-1260.
[8] 窦小东,黄玮,易琦,等. LUCC及气候变化对澜沧江流域径流的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4687-4696.
[9] 傅春,毛安琪.抚河流域径流对土地利用变化时空响应[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(2):342-350.
[10] 李烁阳,刘小燕,杨贵羽,等.土地利用变化对渭河流域水文过程的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):133-140.
[11] 窦小东,彭启洋,张万诚,等.基于情景分析的LUCC和气候变化对南盘江流域径流的影响[J].灾害学,2020,35(1):84-89.
[12] Mo G, Zhang Y, Huang Y, et al. Evaluation and hydrological impact of land-use changes in the Longtan basin[J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2020,129(1):1-11.
[13] Manashi P, Masoud N A, Adel S. Assessing crop water productivity under different irrigation scenarios in the Mid-Atlantic Region[J]. Water, 2021,13.DOI:10.3390/w13131826.
[14] 安锋,陈秋波,谢贵水,等.橡胶人工林的水文生态效应[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(22):359-365.
[15] Hardanto A, Röll A, Hendrayanto, et al. Tree soil water uptake and transpiration in mono-cultural and jungle rubber stands of Sumatra[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017,397:67-77.
[16] Sopharat J, Gay F, Thaler P, et al. A simple framework to analyze water constraints on seasonal transpiration in rubber tree(Hevea brasiliensis)plantations[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015,5.DOI:10.3389/fpls.2014.00753.
[17] Niu F, Röll A, Meijide A, et al. Rubber tree transpiration in the lowlands of Sumatra[J]. Ecohydrology, 2017,10(7).DOI:10.1002/eco.1882.
[18] 文志,赵赫,刘磊,等.海南土地利用变化对土壤水源涵养功能的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(12):4025-4033.
[19] 熊壮,叶文,张树斌,等.西双版纳热带季节雨林与橡胶林凋落物的持水特性[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(6):1054-1061.
[20] 董安涛.西双版纳不同林龄橡胶林土壤特征及水源涵养功能研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2016.
[21] 曾欢欢,刘文杰,吴骏恩,等.西双版纳地区丛林式橡胶林内植物的水分利用策略[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):394-403.
[22] 凌祯.西双版纳橡胶林蒸散量时空变异特征及其预报模型研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2021.
[23] 赵娜,王兆印,徐梦珍,等.橡胶林种植对纳板河水生态的影响[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2015,55(12):1296-1302.
[24] Neyret M, Robain H, de Rouw A, et al. Higher runoff and soil detachment in rubber tree plantations compared to annual cultivation is mitigated by ground cover in steep mountainous Thailand[J]. Catena, 2020,189.DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104472.
[25] 张晓娟.海南岛西部橡胶林生态系统蒸散特征研究[D].海口:海南大学,2016.
[26] 耿思文,吴志祥,杨川.海南儋州地区橡胶林生态系统水汽通量变化特征及其对环境因子的响应[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(1):77-85.
[27] Liu J, Liu W, Zhu K. Throughfall kinetic energy and its spatial characteristics under rubber-based agroforestry systems[J]. Catena, 2018,161:113-121.
[28] 雷金睿,陈宗铸,陈小花,等.1980—2018年海南岛土地利用与生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):4760-4773.
[29] 罗红霞,戴声佩,李茂芬,等.海南岛植被覆盖变化驱动因子及相对作用评价[J].国土资源遥感,2020,32(1):154-161.
[30] 吴际伟,纪义彤,朱丽蓉,等.南渡江龙塘站水位流量关系变化及成因分析[J].人民珠江,2018,39(8):37-42.
[31] Sun R, Wu Z X, Chen B Q, et al. Effects of land-use change on eco-environmental quality in Hainan Island, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,109.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105777.
[32] Chilagane N A, Kashaigili J J, Mutayoba E, et al. Impact of land use and land cover changes on surface runoff and sediment yield in the Little Ruaha River Catchment[J]. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 2021,11(3):54-74.
[33] Teshager A D, Gassman P W, Secchi S, et al. Modeling agricultural watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool(SWAT):calibration and validation with a novel procedure for spatially explicit HRUs[J]. Environmental Management, 2016,57(4):894-911.
[34] Wu J, Deng G, Zhou D, et al. Effects of climate change and land-use changes on spatiotemporal distributions of blue water and green water in Ningxia, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021,13(7):674-687.
[35] 奚建梅.基于SWAT模型的黄河源区河流泥沙变化研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2020.
[36] 刘珉,吴志祥,杨川,等.海南岛橡胶林水分循环过程特征研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(22):27-33.
[37] 林友兴,张一平,费学海,等.云南不同森林生态系统蒸散特征的比较研究[J].云南大学学报:自然科学版,2019,41(1):205-218.
[38] 李旦,徐文,叶长青,等.气候变化和人类活动干扰下万泉河流域水文情势变化特征分析[J].水电能源科学,2019,37(12):14-17.
[39] 王莺,王劲松,武明,等.土地利用和气候变化对嘉陵江流域水文特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):135-142.
[40] 罗开盛,陶福禄.黑河径流对LUCC和气候变化的敏感性分析[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(4):753-760.
[41] Xu Z P, Li Y P, Huang G H, et al. A multi-scenario ensemble streamflow forecast method for Amu Darya River Basin under considering climate and land-use changes[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2021,598.DOI: 10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2021.126276.
[42] 曹灿,孙瑞,吴志祥,等.基于SWAT模型的南渡江上游流域径流对气候变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):255-264.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-06-20