[1]LIANG Jinghui,YANG Gangqiao,HUANG Dan,et al.Land Use Functional Levels and Coupling Coordination Degrees Under the Background of Rural Industry Convergence[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):244-252.
Copy
Land Use Functional Levels and Coupling Coordination Degrees Under the Background of Rural Industry Convergence
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
29
Number of periods:
2022 03
Page number:
244-252
Column:
Public date:
2022-04-20
- Title:
- Land Use Functional Levels and Coupling Coordination Degrees Under the Background of Rural Industry Convergence
- Keywords:
- land use function; industrial convergence; entropy method; coupling coordination degree; Wuhan City and Jingmen City in Hubei Province
- CLC:
- F321.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- To promote the development of the rural industry convergence in the new period, improve the efficiency of land use, based on the ‘process-results', rural land multifunctional use level evaluation index system under the background of industrial convergence was built, three different types of industrial convergence pilot villages in Wuhan City and Jingmen City of Hubei Province were selected as research cases, and entropy method and coupling coordination degree model were adopted to demonstrate the impact of industrial convergence on the land use functional levels and coupling coordination degrees of rural land. The results show that:(1)rural industry convergence can significantly improve the multi-functional levels of land use, however, the land use functional levels of different industrial integration modes are different;(2)different industrial convergence modes of land use by a single function to multifunction exist obvious difference, independent farmers business model, enterprise scale management mode of land use/cooperative still display are given priority to economic function of the characteristics of single function, ‘the agricultural enterprise + cooperative + peasant household' cooperative mode of land use shows obvious trend varying from single function to multifunction;(3)the integration of rural industries can improve the multi-functional coupling coordination degree of land use, which is still at a low level. In the future, the cooperative operation mode of 'agricultural enterprise + cooperative + peasant household‘ should be given priority in the integrated development of rural industries, and the integrated development of rural industries should foster new diversified business entities, and develop green processing industry of agricultural products and rural sightseeing and leisure industry with different characteristics according to local conditions. The farmers' opinions should be fully respected, and their interests should be protected, so as to improve their income levels, sense of gain and happiness, and stimulate the endogenous driving force of rural economic and social development.
- References:
-
[1] 徐凯,房艳刚.乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别:以辽宁省78个区县为例[J].地理研究,2019,38(3):482-495.
[2] 陈秧分,黄修杰,王丽娟.多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):201-209.
[3] 蒋和平,郭超然,蒋黎.乡村振兴背景下我国农业产业的发展思路与政策建议[J].农业经济与管理,2020(1):5-14.
[4] 曾维和,咸鸣霞.乡村振兴的产业共同体模式及其形成机理:基于武家嘴产业兴村的实证调研[J].中国软科学,2019(11):74-85.
[5] 姜长云.农业产业化龙头企业在促进农村产业融合中的作用[J].农业经济与管理,2017(2):5-10.
[6] 苏毅清,游玉婷,王志刚.农村一二三产业融合发展:理论探讨,现状分析与对策建议[J].中国软科学,2016(8):17-28.
[7] 黄雪菲,黄文芳.国别间多功能农业发展评价指标体系构建[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S1):176-179.
[8] 赵之阳.以产业融合引领乡村振兴[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(8):60-64,74.
[9] 李治,王一杰,胡志全.农村一、二、三产业融合评价体系的构建与评价:以北京市为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(11):111-120.
[10] 张灿强,沈贵银.农业文化遗产的多功能价值及其产业融合发展途径探讨[J].中国农业大学学报:社会科学版,2016,33(2):127-135.
[11] Hermanns T, Helming K, Schmidt K, et al. Stakeholder strategies for sustainability impact assessment of land use scenarios:Analytical framework and identifying land use claims[J]. Land, 2015,4(3):778-806.
[12] Helming K, Tscherning K, König B, et al. Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions: The SENSOR approach[M]//Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Springer, Berlin: Heidelberg, 2008.
[13] Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land use functions:A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[M]//Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Springer, Berlin:Heidelberg, 2008.
[14] 冯伟,石汝娟,夏虹,等.农村一二三产业融合发展评价指标体系研究[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(21):5697-5701.
[15] 梁流涛,翟彬,樊鹏飞.经济聚集与产业结构对城市土地利用效率的影响[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(3):113-117.
[16] 贾丹丹,冯忠江,高璇雨.产业结构优化与土地集约利用时空耦合分析:以京津冀为例[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2018,43(1):148-155.
[17] 万倩雯,卫田,刘杰.弥合社会资本鸿沟:构建企业社会创业家与金字塔底层个体间的合作关系:基于LZ农村电商项目的单案例研究[J].管理世界,2019,35(5):179-196.
[18] 刘超,许月卿,刘焱序,等.基于系统论的土地利用多功能分类及评价指标体系研究[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2018,54(1):181-188.
[19] 单薇,金晓斌,冉娜,等.江苏省土地利用“生产—生活—生态”功能变化与耦合特征分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(7):1541-1551.
[20] 周宝同.土地资源可持续利用基本理论探讨[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,29(2):310-314.
[21] 张晓平,朱道林,许祖学.西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):185-194.
[22] 郑伟然,许月卿,黄安,等.张家口市土地利用多功能性动态评价[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(3):84-94.
[23] 姜长云,李乾,芦千文.引导农业产业化组织推动农村产业融合的现状,问题和对策建议[J].经济研究参考,2017(66):5-17.
[24] 刘瀛弢.公益性行业科研项目绩效考评研究[J].中国软科学,2010(6):106-114.
[25] 文高辉,杨钢桥,李文静,等.基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断:以湖北省毛嘴等3个项目为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):26-34.
[26] 蔡洁,刘斐,夏显力.农村产业融合、非农就业与农户增收:基于六盘山的微观实证[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(2):73-79.
[27] 鲁春阳,文枫,张宏敏,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的河南省农业现代化发展水平评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(1):92-97.
[28] 张中秋,劳燕玲,何彩珍,等.土地利用多功能机制及其耦合协调时空分异:以广西为例[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(2):317-331.
[29] 张路路,郑新奇,孟超,等.湖南省土地多功能耦合协调度时空分异[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(3):85-94.
[30] 张建雷.家庭农场发展的多重动力机制分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报:社会科学版,2018,18(1):34-40.
[31] 李士梅,高维龙.要素集聚下我国粮食生产经营制约因素分析[J].农业技术济,2019(6):38-45.
[32] 姜长云.龙头企业的引领和中坚作用不可替代[J].农业经济与管理,2019(6):24-27.
[33] 陈定洋.供给侧改革视域下现代农业产业化联合体研究:产生机理、运行机制与实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(13):78-83.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2022-04-20