[1]LIU Genlin,YAN Bing,ZHAO Dongsheng,et al.Spatiotemporal Evolution of Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Driving Factors in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Region from 2003 to 2018[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):235-243.
Copy
Spatiotemporal Evolution of Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Driving Factors in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Region from 2003 to 2018
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
29
Number of periods:
2022 03
Page number:
235-243
Column:
Public date:
2022-04-20
- Title:
- Spatiotemporal Evolution of Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Driving Factors in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Region from 2003 to 2018
- Keywords:
- land use; landscape pattern; spatiotemporal evolution; driving factors; Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Region
- CLC:
- F301.24; P901
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to understand the spatiotemporal change characteristics and driving factors of landscape pattern of land use in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Reigion in the past 15 years, based on the 4 phases of remote sensing images, RS and GIS technology, land use dynamics, land use transfer matrix, landscape pattern index were use to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land use and landscape pattern in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Reigion, and 11 socio-economic factors for principal component analysis were selected to analyze their driving factors by combining with relevant statistical information and policies and regulations. The results show that forest land was the most important land use type in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu region, and accounted for about 69% of the total area of the study area. From 2003 to 2008, construction land had a continuous increase trend, while cultivated land had a continuous decrease trend, and grassland and waters were in a state of fluctuation. Type conversion was dominated by the mutual conversion between forest land and grassland, grassland and cultivated land, cultivated land and construction land. Cultivated land was the main source of conversion of construction land. The degree of fragmentation of the landscape in the study area was reduced, the advantages were improved, the overall diversity and balance were slightly improved, and the landscape types in the study area were balanced and diversified. The changes in the landscape pattern of land use in Ruijin-Xingguo-Yudu Region were affected to a certain extent by topography and geomorphology. The main driving factors are economic development, population growth, industrial structure adjustment, and the implementation of relevant policies and regulations.
- References:
-
[1] Mooney H A, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013,110:3665-3672.
[2] Awotwi A, Anornu G K, Quaye-Ballard J A, et al. Water balance responses to land-use/land-cover changes in the Pra River Basin of Ghana, 1986—2025[J]. Catena, 2019,182:104129, DOI:10,1016/j.catena,2019,104129.
[3] Hayal D, Aramde F. Land-use and land-cover change in Lake Ziway watershed of the Ethiopian Central Rift Valley Region and its environmental impacts[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,96. DOI:10,1016/j.landusepol,2020.104682.
[4] Ghosh S. A city growth and land-use/land-cover change:a case study of Bhopal, India[J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2019,5(4):1569-1578.
[5] 卢德彬,禹真,毛婉柳,等.基于GIS和分形理论的山区土地利用空间结构研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(2):220-223,228.
[6] Sarparast M, Ownegh M, Sepehr A. Investigation the driving forces of land-use change in northeastern Iran:Causes and effects[J]. Remote Sensing Applications:Society and Environment, 2020,19. DOI:10,1016/j.rsase,2020.100348.
[7] Li J H, Zhou K C, Dong H M, et al. Cultivated land change, driving forces and its impact on landscape pattern changes in the Dongting lake basin[J]. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020,17(21). DOI:10,3390/ijerph17217988.
[8] 周亚军,刘廷玺,段利民,等.锡林河流域上游河谷湿地景观格局演变及其驱动力[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(3):580-590.
[9] 万义良,金瑞,唐建波,等.东莞市城镇扩张景观格局变化特征[J].经济地理,2019,39(3):84-92.
[10] 陈利顶,李秀珍,傅伯杰,等.中国景观生态学发展历程与未来研究重点[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3129-3141.
[11] 刘纪远,宁佳,匡文慧,等.2010—2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):789-802.
[12] 田鹏,李加林,史小丽,等.浙江省土地利用格局时空变化及生态风险评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(12):2697-2706.
[13] 陈铸,傅伟聪,黄钰麟,等.福州市土地利用景观格局变化及驱动力研究[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2020,45(1):99-107.
[14] 田雨,周宝同,付伟,等.2000—2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究:以重庆市渝北区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(6):1344-1353.
[15] 马思瀛.北京市郊区农户土地利用行为及驱动力研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2018.
[16] 李硕,沈占锋,柯映明,等.1974—2019年大清河流域土地利用景观时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):195-203.
[17] 吕乐婷,张杰,彭秋志,等.东江流域景观格局演变分析及变化预测[J].生态学报,2019,39(18):6850-6859.
[18] 王涛,肖彩霞,刘娇,等.杞麓湖流域景观时空格局演变及其对景观生态风险的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):219-225.
[19] 范丽娟,田广星.1995—2015年上海市土地利用及其景观格局变化[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):287-292.
[20] 刘纪远,邓祥征. LUCC时空过程研究的方法进展[J].科学通报,2009,54(21):3251-3258.
[21] 龙辉,廖和平,张茜茜,等.基于GIS的土地利用/覆被与景观格局变化研究:以重庆市两江新区为例[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2019,41(6):90-98.
[22] 廖慧,舒章康,金君良,等.1980—2015年黄河流域土地利用变化特征与驱动力[J].南水北调与水利科技:中英文,2021,19(1):129-139.
[23] 赵方圆,杨宇翔,张华堂,等.土地利用及景观格局动态变化分析:以甘肃省党河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):235-241.
[24] 陈希,王克林,祁向坤,等.湘江流域景观格局变化及生态服务价值响应[J].经济地理,2016,36(5):175-181.
[25] 李硕,沈占锋,柯映明,等.1974—2019年大清河流域土地利用景观时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):195-203,210.
[26] 刘晓君,李占斌,李鹏,等.基于土地利用/覆被变化的流域景观格局与水沙响应关系研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(18):5691-5700.
[27] 马小雪,卞子诰,李娜,等.秦淮河流域1980—2010年土地利用变化及驱动机制[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(6):272-276.
[28] 张荣鹏.徐州市土地利用变化及驱动力分析:基于主成分分析法[J].农村经济与科技,2020,31(4):6-8.
[29] 王广博,徐翠兰,黄蕊,等.江苏沿海地区围垦动态与土地利用变化驱动力研究[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版,2020,48(2):163-170.
[30] 张浚茂,臧传富.东南诸河流域1990—2015年土地利用时空变化特征及驱动机制[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):9339-9350.
[31] 冉凤维,罗志军,章磊.2000—2015年南昌市土地利用变化及驱动力分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2017,39(4):834-842.
[32] 王玲,米文宝,王鑫,等.限制开发生态区土地利用变化驱动力分析:以宁夏西吉县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(1):51-57.
[33] 朱丽辉,徐瑶,杜忠.2000—2015年四川省南充市土地利用/覆被变化及其驱动因素[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):257-261,347.
[34] 臧玉珠,刘彦随,杨园园.山区县域土地利用格局变化及其地形梯度效应:以井冈山市为例[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(7):1391-1404.
[35] 叶晶萍,刘士余,盛菲,等.寻乌水流域景观格局演变及其生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):4737-4748.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2022-04-20