PDF Download

[1]YANG Danli,SUN Jianwei,LIU Yan,et al.Analysis on Coupling Coordination Characteristics of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Rural Settlement in Karst Mountainous Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):337-344.

Copy

Analysis on Coupling Coordination Characteristics of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Rural Settlement in Karst Mountainous Areas

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 02 Page number: 337-344 Column: Public date: 2022-03-20

Title:: Analysis on Coupling Coordination Characteristics of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Rural Settlement in Karst Mountainous Areas

Author(s):: YANG Danli¹, SUN Jianwei¹, LIU Yan¹, LUO Jing², ZHAO Yuluan¹, ZHANG Ji³; (1.College of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China; 2.Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China; 3.Chongqing Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Chongqing 401147, China)

Keywords:: rural settlement; ‘production-living-ecological' space; Gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area(2 SFCA)method; coupling coordination degree; karst mountainous areas

CLC:: K901.8

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to explore the internal relationship of ‘production-living-ecological' space, taking rural settlement plaques as the research unit, we used the Gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area(2 SFCA)method and kernel density analysis to analyze the differentiation characteristics of rural settlement and its production-living-ecological space in Qixingguan district, and used the coupling coordination degree model to quantitatively calculate the coupling degree and coupling coordinate degree of rural settlement. The results show that:(1)the rural settlement as a whole shows the characteristics of ‘large distribution but small cluster' in Qixingguan district, the circle structure of living space is prominent, the difference between north and south of production space is significant, and the ecological space is relatively scattered;(2)there are four types of coupling degrees and five types of coupling coordination degrees in the spatial function of ‘production-living-ecological' space of rural settlement, the coupling coordination state is subject to the ‘core-edge' mode;(3)there is strong central city direction of coupling coordination status among every two of the rural settlement ‘production-living-ecological' space function, and the coupling coordination of ‘production-ecological' space is higher than that of ‘production-living' space and ‘living-ecological' space in Qixingguan district. The coupling coordination level of ‘production-living-ecological' space of rural settlement in Qixingguan district needs to be improved, and the rural ‘production-living-ecological' space needs to be planned scientifically to promote the healthy development of rural in karst mountainous areas.

References:: [1] 李小建,杨慧敏.乡村聚落变化及发展型式展望[J].经济地理,2017,37(12):1-8.
[2] Liu Y S, Li J T, Yang Y Y. Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,74:5-14.
[3] 樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350.
[4] Schößer B, Helming K, Wiggering H. Assessing land use change impacts: A comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks[J]. Journal of Land Use Science, 2010,5(2):159-178.
[5] Willemen L, Hein L, Martinus E F, et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region[J]. Ecological Indicators Landscape Assessment for Sustainable Planning, 2010,10(1):62-73.
[6] Von der dunk A, Grêt-regamey A, Dalang T, et al. Defining a typology of peri-urban land-use conflicts: A case study from Switzerland[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011,101(2):149-156.
[7] 崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[8] 黄金川,林浩曦,漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391.
[9] 江曼琦,刘勇.“三生”空间内涵与空间范围的辨析[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(4):43-48.
[10] 金贵,王占岐,姚小薇,等.国土空间分区的概念与方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2017,27(5):48-53.
[11] 李广东,方创琳.城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
[12] 周浩,金平,夏卫生.省级国土空间“三生”功能评价及其分区研究:以河南省为例[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(8):10-17.
[13] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
[14] 李晓青,刘旺彤,谢亚文,等.多规合一背景下村域三生空间划定与实证研究[J].经济地理,2019,39(10):146-152.
[15] 金贵,邓祥征,张倩,等.武汉城市圈国土空间综合功能分区[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):541-552.
[16] 刘鹏,陈荣蓉,杨朝现,等.基于“三生空间”协调的农村居民点布局优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):283-288.
[17] 高慧慧,王征强,王涛,等.三生空间协调度的中泉镇农村居民点布局优化[J].测绘科学,2021,46(3):176-182.
[18] 席建超,王首琨,张瑞英.旅游乡村聚落“生产—生活—生态”空间重构与优化:河北野三坡旅游区苟各庄村的案例实证[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(3):425-435.
[19] 李伟松,李江风,姚尧,等.三生空间重构视角下的镇域农村居民点整治分区:以湖北省荆门市沙洋县官垱镇为例[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(1):139-143.
[20] 崔树强,朱佩娟,周国华,等.“三生”视角下的城市空间功能变化及调控路径:以长沙市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(8):1733-1745.
[21] 王强,陈田田,李爱迪,等.“三生”视角下的国土空间利用质量评价:以攀西地区为例[J].山地学报,2020,38(2):290-302.
[22] 张军涛,翟婧彤.中国“三生空间”耦合协调度测度[J].城市问题,2019(11):38-44.
[23] 马利邦,田亚亚,郭晓东,等.基于格网的河西绿洲乡村聚落时空演变及其与水土资源的空间耦合关系[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(5):775-787.
[24] 孙建伟,孔雪松,田雅丝,等.基于空间组合特征的农村居民点重构方向识别[J].地理科学,2017,37(5):748-755.
[25] 傅俐,王勇,曾彪,等.基于改进两步移动搜索法的北碚区医疗设施空间可达性分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2019,21(10):1565-1575.
[26] 邓丽,邵景安,郭跃,等.基于改进的两步移动搜索法的山区医疗服务空间可达性:以重庆市石柱县为例[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(6):716-725.
[27] 孔雪松,蒋献佳,刘叶,等.国土空间开发强度与资源环境承载时空耦合及规划启示:以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(6):10-17.
[28] 王成,唐宁.重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J].地理研究,2018,37(6):1100-1114.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-04-20