PDF Download

[1]PEI Hongwei,LIU Mengzhu,LI Yali,et al.Impact of Ecological Restoration Measures on Ecosystem Services in Arid and Semi-arid Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):192-199+205.

Copy

Impact of Ecological Restoration Measures on Ecosystem Services in Arid and Semi-arid Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 02 Page number: 192-199+205 Column: Public date: 2022-03-20

Title:: Impact of Ecological Restoration Measures on Ecosystem Services in Arid and Semi-arid Area

Author(s):: PEI Hongwei^1,2, LIU Mengzhu^1,2, LI Yali^1,2, ZHANG Hongjuan^1,2, XIAO Yuxiao^1,2, YANG Guoli^1,2; (1.Department of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Hebei, Zhangjiakou 075000, China; 2.Hebei Key Laboratory of Water Quality Engineering and Comprehensive Utilization of Water Resources, Zhangjiakou, Hebei 075000, China)

Keywords:: land use; Bashang area; ecosystem services; InVEST model; ecological restoration measures

CLC:: X171.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: To reveal the impacts of ecological restoration measures on ecosystem services and contribute to scientific policy-makings for the ecological management in arid and semi-arid area, based on the land use data of Bashang area in the period 2000—2018 and four future land use scenarios, this study quantified and mapped the changes in land use and three important ecosystem services(water conservation, carbon storage, and habitat quality)in different scenarios using InVEST model. The results showed that:(1)during 2000—2018, the land use changes were characterized by grassland shrinkage and woodland expansion(>500 km²); at the same period, water conservation moderately decreased by approximately 7.03%, and carbon storage and habitat quality slightly increased by 2.82% and 1.29%, respectively;(2)compared with base scenario, riparian woodland buffer and planting trees scenarios performed worse than reclaiming wasteland and integrated development scenarios on ecosystem services provisions;(3)the trade-offs and synergies among three ecosystem services showed that there were strong synergy relationships between water conservation and habitat quality, as well as carbon storage and habitat quality(r>0.42). Besides, there was a low positive correlation between water conservation and carbon storage(r<0.24). Overall, ecological restoration measures played an important role in enhancing the ecosystem services in the Bashang area, but afforestation-driven ecological restoration in the arid and semi-arid area should be carried out with extreme caution.

References:: [1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M].Washington DC: Island Press,2005.
[2] 吴杨,潘玉雪,张博雅,等.IPBES框架下的生物多样性和生态系统服务区域评估及政策经验[J].生物多样性,2020,28(7):913-919.
[3] 金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,等.2005—2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1242-1252.
[4] Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital[J]. Science, 2016,352(6292):1455-1459.
[5] 元杰,姚顺波,侯孟阳,等.退耕还林还草工程对生态系统碳储存服务的影响:以黄土高原丘陵沟壑区子长县为例[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(4):826-844.
[6] 郑树峰,王丽萍,臧淑英.大兴安岭天保工程区生态系统服务变化研究[J].地理科学,2021,41(7):1295-1302.
[7] Cao S X, Chen L, Shankman D, et al. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China's arid and semi-arid regions: Lessons in ecological restoration[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2011,104(4):240-245.
[8] 杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡.基于InVEST模型的黄河流域产水量时空变化及其对降水和土地利用变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(8):2731-2739.
[9] 郭洪伟,孙小银,廉丽姝,等.基于CLUE-S和InVEST模型的南四湖流域生态系统产水能力对土地利用变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2899-2906.
[10] Sun X, Li F. Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment. 2017,609:1569-1581.
[11] Gao J, Li F, Gao H, et al. The impact of land-use change on water-related ecosystem services: a study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016,163(S):148-155.
[12] Sharps K, Masante D, Thomas A, et al. Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,584:118-130.
[13] Ochoa V, Urbina-Cardona N. Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: Publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,26:155-169.
[14] 赵晓冏,王建,苏军德,等.基于InVEST模型和莫兰指数的甘肃省生境质量与退化度评估[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(18):301-308.
[15] Shoyama K, Yamagata Y. Predicting land-use change for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation and its effect on ecosystem services in a watershed in Japan[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2014,8:25-34.
[16] 刘孟竹,王彦芳,裴宏伟.退耕还林(草)背景下中国北方农牧交错带土地利用及碳储量变化[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(1):174-182.
[17] 欧阳志云,王桥,郑华,等.全国生态环境十年变化(2000—2010年)遥感调查评估[J].中国科学院院刊,2014,29(4):462-466.
[18] 王彦芳,裴宏伟.1980—2015年河北坝上地区生态环境状况评价与对策研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(1):186-190,236.
[19] 王强,康慕谊,邢开雄.基于水资源约束的张家口坝上生态经济发展研究[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,47(6):618-624.
[20] 胡曾曾.首都水源涵养区和生态环境支撑区的生态补偿量化研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2018.
[21] 刘晓,张学霞,徐新良,等.河北坝上土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(8):94-104.
[22] 汪言在,董一帆,苏正安.基于土地利用与植被恢复情景的土壤侵蚀演变特征[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1369-1380.
[23] 刘孟竹,王彦芳,裴宏伟.基于土地利用变化的河北省坝上地区景观生态风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):303-311.
[24] 吴瑞,刘桂环,文一惠.基于InVEST模型的官厅水库流域产水和水质净化服务时空变化[J].环境科学研究,2017,30(3):406-414.
[25] 李瑾璞,夏少霞,于秀波,等.基于InVEST模型的河北省陆地生态系统碳储量研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(7):854-861.
[26] 吴一帆,张璇,李冲,等.生态修复措施对流域生态系统服务功能的提升:以潮河流域为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(15):5168-5178.
[27] Sun G, Zhou G Y, Zhang Z Q, et al. Potential water yield reduction due to forestation across China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006,328(3):548-558.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-04-20