PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]CHEN Haifang,YANG Guofan,LIN Maosen,et al.Spatiotemporal Changes and Affecting Factors of Potential Evapotranspiration in the Second Songhua River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):238-244.

Copy

Spatiotemporal Changes and Affecting Factors of Potential Evapotranspiration in the Second Songhua River Basin

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 05 Page number: 238-244 Column: Public date: 2021-08-20

Title:: Spatiotemporal Changes and Affecting Factors of Potential Evapotranspiration in the Second Songhua River Basin

Author(s):: CHEN Haifang¹,YANG Guofan¹,LIN Maosen¹,WU Jiabing^2,3,YUAN Fenghui^2,3; (1.College of Water Conservancy,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China; 2.Institute of Applied Ecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang 110016,China; 3.CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management,Institute of Applied Ecology,Shenyang 110016,China)

Keywords:: the Second Songhua River Basin; potential evapotranspiration; Penman-Monteith method; spatiotemporal analysis

CLC:: P426.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Potential evapotranspiration(ET₀)is a significant part in regional hydrologic cycle and energy balance,and also a key factor in estimating actual evapotranspiration,evaluating ecological environment and rationally planning water resources. So it is of great significance to analyze spatiotemporal changes and affecting factors of ET₀ in studying the response of water resources to climate change. Based on the daily measured meteorological data from 1978 to 2018 at 11 meteorological stations in and around the Second Songhua River Basin,mathematical statistics method,such as Penman-Monteith method,Mann-Kendall method,Kriging interpolation method,stepwise regression analysis method and partial correlation analysis method,were used to analyze the spatiotemporal changes and affecting factors of ET₀ in the plain area and mountain area of the basin in recent 41 years. The results show that:(1)in the Second Songhua River Basin from 1978 to 2018,the ET₀ in the plain area showed a slight downward trend,with a climatic tendency rate of 6.99 mm/decade and a multi-year average of 825.9 mm; the ET₀ in mountainous areas increased significantly(p<0.01),with a climatic tendency rate of 10.49 mm/decade and a multi-year average of 738.8 mm; summer and spring ET₀ contributed the most to the annual ET₀ of the Second Songhua River Basin; on the spatial scale,the annual ET₀ decreased gradually from northwest to southeast;(2)the temperatured(average,maximum,minimum)of 41 years in the study area increased significantly(p<0.01),and sunshine duration,wind speed and relative humidity decreased; on the seasonal scale,except for the slight rising trend of relative humidity in the plain area in autumn,the change direction of other meteorological factors was consistent with that of the whole year;(3)sunshine duration and wind speed were the main factors affecting ET₀ change in plain areas,while the significant decrease of relative humidity was the main reason for the obvious change of ET₀ in mountainous areas; the influence of meteorological factors on ET₀ changed due to seasons and geomorphologic types.

References:: [1] Allen R G,Pereira L S,Raes D,et al. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56[R]. Rome:FAO,1998.
[2] 孙婉馨,张黎,任小丽,等.1998—2017年中国典型森林生态系统潜在蒸散的变化趋势及成因[J].资源科学,2020,42(5):920-932.
[3] 高歌,陈德亮,任国玉,等.1956—2000年中国潜在蒸散量变化趋势[J].地理研究,2006,25(3):378-387.
[4] 谢贤群,王菱.中国北方近50年潜在蒸发的变化[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(5):683-691.
[5] 王焕,梅再美.贵州省地表蒸散发时空变化及其与气候因子的关系[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):221-229.
[6] 姜宇,杜崇,孙海宁,等.气候变化条件下黑龙江省作物生长季潜在蒸散发量时空变化特征及其敏感性分析[J].水电能源科学,2018,36(5):6-9.
[7] Gao X,Peng S,Wang W,et al. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of reference evapotranspiration trends in Karst area:a case study in Guizhou Province,China[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics,2016,128(5):677-688.
[8] 曹永强,刘明阳,李元菲,等.不同潜在蒸散发估算方法在辽宁省的适用性分析[J].资源科学,2019,41(10):1780-1790.
[9] Guan X,Zhang J,Yang Q,et al. Changing characteristics and attribution analysis of potential evapotranspiration in the Huang-Huai-Hai River Basin,China[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics,2021,133(1):97-108.
[10] 唐晓培,宋妮,陈智芳,等.未来主要气候情景下黄淮海地区参考作物蒸散量时空分布[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(14):168-176.
[11] 刘小莽,郑红星,刘昌明,等.海河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(9):1470-1476.
[12] Xu Y,Xu Y P,Wang Y F,et al. Spatial and temporal trends of reference crop evapotranspiration and its influential variables in Yangtze River Delta,eastern China[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2016,130(3):945-958.
[13] Gong L B,Xu C Y,Chen D L,et al. Singh. Analysis of spatial distribution and temporal trend of reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation in Changjiang(Yangtze River)catchment[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2006,327(1):81-93.
[14] Tao X E,Chen H,Xu C Y,et al. Analysis and prediction of reference evapotranspiration with climate change in Xiangjiang River Basin,China[J]. Water Science and Engineering,2015,8(4):273-281.
[15] Du C,Yu J,Wang P,et al. Reference evapotranspiration changes:Sensitivities to and contributions of meteorological factors in the Heihe River Basin of Northwestern China(1961—2014)[J]. Advances in Meteorology,2016.
[16] 左德鹏,徐宗学,程磊,等.渭河流域潜在蒸散量时空变化及其突变特征[J].资源科学,2011,33(5):975-982.
[17] 郭小娇,龚晓萍,石建省,等.典型岩溶区潜在蒸散发变化及其影响因素[J].地质学报,2019,93(12):3269-3281.
[18] 叶红,张廷斌,易桂花,等.2000—2014年黄河源区ET时空特征及其与气候因子关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(11):2117-2134.
[19] Zhang Y,Liu C,Tang Y,et al. Trends in pan evaporation and reference and actual evapotranspiration across the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2007,112,D12110,doi:10.1029/2006 JD008161,2007.
[20] 丛振涛,倪广恒,杨大文,等.“蒸发悖论”在中国的规律分析[J].水科学进展,2008,19(2):147-152.
[21] 岳元,王艳萍,王琪,等.“蒸发悖论”现象在吉林省地区的表现[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(5):225-231.
[22] Burn D H,Hesch N M. Trends in evaporation for the Canadian Prairies[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,336(1):61-73.
[23] Patle G T,Sengdo D,Tapak M. Trends in major climatic parameters and sensitivity of evapotranspiration to climatic parameters in the eastern Himalayan region of Sikkim,India[J]. Journal of Water and Climate Change,2020,11(2):491-502.
[24] Irmak S,Kabenge I,Skaggs K E,et al. Trend and magnitude of changes in climate variables and reference evapotranspiration over 116-yr period in the Platte River Basin,central Nebraska-USA[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2012,420:228-244.
[25] Roderick M L,Farquhar G D. Changes in New Zealand pan evaporation since the 1970s[J]. International Journal of Climatology,2005,25(15):2031-2039.
[26] Roderick M L,Farquhar G D. Changes in Australian pan evaporation from 1970 to 2002[J]. International Journal of Climatology,2004,24(9):1077-1090.
[27] Thomas A. Spatial and temporal characteristics of potential evapotranspiration trends over China[J]. International Journal of Climatology,2000,20(4):381-396.
[28] Nouri M,Bannayan M. Spatiotemporal changes in aridity index and reference evapotranspiration over semi-arid and humid regions of Iran:trend,cause,and sensitivity analyses[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2019,136(3):1073-1084.
[29] Silva V D. On climate variability in Northeast of Brazil[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2004,58(4):575-596.
[30] 温姗姗,姜彤,李修仓,等.1961—2010年松花江流域实际蒸散发时空变化及影响要素分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2014,10(2):79-86.
[31] 钟巧,焦黎,李稚,等.博斯腾湖流域潜在蒸散发时空演变及归因分析[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(1):103-112.
[32] 刘钰,李王成,谭军利,等.吉林平原地区参考作物蒸散量变化趋势及主要影响要素分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(S2):112-115.
[33] Wang Z,Xie P,Lai C,et al. Spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and contributing climatic factors in China during 1961—2013[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2017,544:97-108.
[34] 邱美娟,刘布春,刘园,等.吉林省参考作物蒸散量的时空变化特征及影响因素[J].干旱气象,2019,37(1):119-126.
[35] 孙福宝.基于Budyko水热耦合平衡假设的流域蒸散发研究[D].北京:清华大学,2007.
[36] 刘志娟,杨晓光,王文峰,等.气候变化背景下我国东北三省农业气候资源变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(9):2199-2206.
[37] 刘玉汐,任景全,王冬妮,等.吉林省参考作物蒸散量时空分布及成因分析[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(11):2208-2215.
[38] 岳元,申双和,金宇,等.“蒸发悖论”在吉林省的表现及成因分析[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(7):1993-2002.
[39] 刘昌明,张丹.中国地表潜在蒸散发敏感性的时空变化特征分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):579-588.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-08-20