PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]ZHU Dianzhen,CHU Lei,MA Shuai,et al.Tradeoff and Synergistic Relationship Among Ecosystem Services[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):308-315.

Copy

Tradeoff and Synergistic Relationship Among Ecosystem Services

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 04 Page number: 308-315 Column: Public date: 2021-08-10

Title:: Tradeoff and Synergistic Relationship Among Ecosystem Services

Author(s):: ZHU Dianzhen, CHU Lei, MA Shuai, WANG Liangjie, ZHANG Jinchi; (Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration/Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Keywords:: ecosystem services; spatiotemporal variation; tradeoff and synergies; Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecological barrier

CLC:: X171.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to make sustainable management decisions for multiple ecosystem services, it is important to clarify the relationship between ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies. In this study, the spatiotemporal variations of soil conservation, water yield, carbon sequestration were analyzed using land use and land cover(LULC), soil types, meteorology, and DEM datasets in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Ecological barrier area of China. In addition, we identified hot spots for three ecosystem services supplies, and explored the tradeoff and synergistic among three ecosystem services. The results showed that:(1)the soil conservation, water yield and carbon storage all showed a decreasing trend from southeast to northwest;(2)from 2000 to 2015, water yield and soil conservation showed a downward trend with a decrease of 95.27 mm and 1 081.38 t/hm², while an increasing trend of carbon storage was found with an increases of 25.77 g C/m²;(3)the area of the first and second type hot spot decreased, while the area of the third type hot spot and non-hot spot increased; forest provided stronger ecosystem services than those of grassland in the study area;(4)from 2000 to 2015, in terms of space, the synergy between the three ecosystem services was getting stronger, which was reflected by the increase of correlation coefficients; according to timelines, the mutual relationships among the three ecosystem services were weakening, showing a decrease in correlation coefficients.The spatiotemporal variation trends of the three ecosystem services in the study area were different. There were the significant synergies among services, and there was also strong and weak change with spatiotemporal variation.

References:: [1] 王晓峰,程昌武,尹礼唱,等.新疆生态系统服务时空变化及权衡协同关系[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(3):990-1000.
[2] 尹礼唱,王晓峰,张琨,等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2162-2172.
[3] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[4] 刘洋,毕军,吕建树.生态系统服务权衡与协同关系及驱动力:以江苏省太湖流域为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7067-7078.
[5] 袁周炎妍,万荣荣.生态系统服务评估方法研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,38(5):210-219.
[6] 巩杰,柳冬青,高秉丽,等.西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系:以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1278-1288.
[7] 高敏,王勇,高洁,等.喀斯特地区退耕还林工程下生态系统服务变化与关系分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):276-283.
[8] 武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.
[9] 饶胜,林泉,王夏晖,等.正蓝旗草地生态系统服务权衡研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(3):81-86.
[10] 林子雁,肖燚,饶恩明,等.中国西南地区不同类型生态系统服务的关系[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):978-986.
[11] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡—协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[12] 卢慧婷,黄琼中,朱捷缘,等.拉萨河流域生态系统类型和质量变化及其对生态系统服务的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8911-8918.
[13] Li S C, Zhang H, Zhou X W, et al. Enhancing protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,43.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101090.
[14] 孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].地理学报,2012,67(1):3-12.
[15] 程琳琳,刘华,刘焱序.青藏高原保护区植被与生态系统服务功能变化的一致性分析[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(6):277-282.
[16] 顾羊羊.太湖流域生态系统服务时空权衡与协同效应分析[D].河南焦作:河南理工大学,2017.
[17] 冯晓玙,黄斌斌,李若男,等.三江源区生态系统和土壤保持服务对未来气候变化的响应特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6351-6361.
[18] 孙亚楠.农牧交错带土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2018.
[19] 朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(3):413-424.
[20] 沃笑,吴良才,张继平,等.基于CASA模型的三江源地区植被净初级生产力遥感估算研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(9):45-50.
[21] 戴路祎,唐海萍,张钦,等.北方农牧交错带多伦县生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2863-2876.
[22] 张雪峰,牛建明,张庆,等.内蒙古锡林河流域草地生态系统水源涵养功能空间格局[J].干旱区研究,2016,33(4):814-821.
[23] 王川,刘春芳,乌亚汗,等.黄土丘陵区生态系统服务空间格局及权衡与协同关系:以榆中县为例[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):521-531.
[24] Wang J T, Peng J, Zhao M Y, et al. Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,574:57-64.
[25] 林志东,武国胜.基于MODIS的大田县均溪谷地NPP与与NDVI相关性的时空变化特征[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2015,10(1):27-33.
[26] 高子恒,柳艺博,丁炜.基于风云四号遥感数据的NDVI估算中国陆地地区植被NPP[J].江苏海洋大学学报:自然科学版,2020,29(1):40-50.
[27] 王塞,王思诗,樊风雷.基于时间序列分割算法的雅鲁藏布江流域NDVI(1985—2018)变化模式研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(19):6863-6871.
[28] 周天财,孙建,于欢.1980—2013年青藏高原气候时空变化特征研究[J].成都信息工程大学学报,2017,32(5):524-531.
[29] 洪美玲,何士华.1961—2010年怒江流域降雨时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):248-252.
[30] 杨霞,旦增旺姆,扎西央宗.西藏地区降水变化特征与影响因素分析[J].现代农业科技,2014(24):229.
[31] 谭春萍,杨建平,米睿.1971—2007年青藏高原南部气候变化特征分析[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(6):1111-1120.
[32] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[33] 冯晓莉,申红艳,李万志,等.1961—2017年青藏高原暖湿季节极端降水时空变化特征[J].高原气象,2020,39(4):694-705.
[34] Qiao X N, Gu Y Y, Zou C X, et al. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,651:218-229.
[35] 孙艺杰,任志远,郝梦雅,等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素:以延安市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3443-3454.
[36] 王建,王根绪,王长庭,等.青藏高原高寒区阔叶林植被固碳现状、速率和潜力[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(4):374-384.
[37] 王艳丽,字洪标,程瑞希,等.青海省森林土壤有机碳氮储量及其垂直分布特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(11):4096-4105.
[38] 冉凤维.鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2019.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-08-20