PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]ZHANG Yuhang,LI Ling,WANG Xiuli,et al.Ecological Spatial Identification and Pattern Optimization in Henan Province Based on Fuzzy Gamma Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):211-217,225.

Copy

Ecological Spatial Identification and Pattern Optimization in Henan Province Based on Fuzzy Gamma Model

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 27 Number of periods: 2020 06 Page number: 211-217,225 Column: 目次 Public date: 2020-10-20

Title:: Ecological Spatial Identification and Pattern Optimization in Henan Province Based on Fuzzy Gamma Model

Author(s):: ZHANG Yuhang^1,2, LI Ling^1,2, WANG Xiuli^1,2, LU Jie², LI Shanshan³; (1.College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2.Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 3.Geophysical Survey Team of Henan Coalfield Geology Bureau, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Keywords:: land ecology; ecological space; fuzzy Gamma model; importance of ecosystem services; ecosystem sensitivity

CLC:: X171.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Land ecological security is related to the development of human society. In order to clarify the overall pattern of ecological space in the study area, check the list of overall resources in the study area, and understand the current situation of land natural ecosystem, the identification and pattern optimization of ecological space is an effective way to ensure the ecological security of land in the region. Based on the comprehensive ecosystem service importance evaluation model and ecosystem sensitivity evaluation model, ArcGIS 10.5 platform, selecting evaluation indicators according to the ecological background of the study area, Henan Province was taken as the study area, fuzzy gamma model was used to identify the ecological space based on the fuzzy logic theory, and the scheme of ecological space optimization pattern was put forward. The results show that there are four types of ecological spaces in the study area: ecological protection space, restriction space, control buffer space and optimization development space; the area of ecological protection space is 13 668.73 km², accounting for 8.3% of the total study area, the area of restriction space is 19 161.78 km², accounting for 11.63% of the total study area, the area of control buffer space is 9 434.67 km², accounting for 5.72% of the total study area;, the area of optimized development space is 122 480.73 km², accounting for 74.34% of the total study area. According to the results of ecological space identification, the optimization scheme of ecological space pattern in the study area is proposed. The study area is divided into three areas, two belts and three blocks, which are Taihang Mountain ecological red line protection area, Dabie Mountain ecological red line protection area, Funiu Mountain ecological red line protection area, Yellow River ecological protection belt, Huaihe River ecological protection belt, east Henan plain ecological protection block, west Henan hills ecological protection block and north Henan hills ecological protection block.

References:: [1] 李晓文,方精云,朴世龙.上海城市用地扩展强度、模式及其空间分异特征[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(4):412-422.
[2] 陈利顶,孙然好,刘海莲.城市景观格局演变的生态环境效应研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(4):1042-1050.
[3] 刘彦随,刘玉,翟荣新.中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践[J].地理学报,2009,64(10):1193-1202.
[4] 谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁,等.中国的生态空间占用研究[J].资源科学,2001, 25(6):20-23.
[5] 白艳莹,王效科,欧阳志云,等.苏锡常地区生态足迹分析[J].资源科学,2003, 27(6):31-37.
[6] 曹淑艳,谢高地.基于投入产出分析的中国生态足迹模型[J].生态学报,2007, 27(4):1499-1507.
[7] 鲁春霞,谢高地,成升魁,等.青藏高原自然资产利用的生态空间占用评价[J].资源科学,2001,25(6):29-35.
[8] 郭荣朝,苗长虹.城市群生态空间结构研究[J].经济地理,2007,27(1):104-107,92.
[9] 李锋,叶亚平,宋博文,等.城市生态用地的空间结构及其生态系统服务动态演变:以常州市为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(19):5623-5631.
[10] 陈爽,刘云霞,彭立华.城市生态空间演变规律及调控机制:以南京市为例[J].生态学报,2008, 28(5):2270-2278.
[11] 谢花林,李秀彬.基于GIS的区域关键性生态用地空间结构识别方法探讨[J].资源科学,2011,35(1):112-119.
[12] 张骞,高明,杨乐,等.1988—2013年重庆市主城九区生态用地空间结构及其生态系统服务价值变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):566-575.
[13] 李玉平,蔡运龙.河北省土地生态安全评价[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2007,53(6):784-789.
[14] 周锐,王新军,苏海龙,等.平顶山新区生态用地的识别与安全格局构建[J].生态学报,2015,35(6):2003-2012.
[15] 张亮,岳文泽.城市生态空间多元综合识别研究:以杭州市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(17):6460-6468.
[16] 吴健生,张理卿,彭建,等.深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4125-4133.
[17] 环境保护部,国家发展改革委员会办公厅.生态保护红线划定指南[EB/OL]. http:∥www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201707/t20170728_418679.htm 2017:5.
[18] 王万中,焦菊英,郝小品,等.中国降雨侵蚀力R值的计算与分布(Ⅰ)[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):5-18.
[19] 谢花林,姚干,何亚芬,等.基于GIS的关键性生态空间辨识:以鄱阳湖生态经济区为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5926-5937.
[20] 杨娜.基于生态安全评价的祁门县阊江河流景观提升策略研究[D].合肥:安徽建筑大学,2019.
[21] 孙文义,邵全琴,刘纪远.黄土高原不同生态系统水土保持服务功能评价[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(3):365-376.
[22] 马孟枭,张慧,高吉喜,等.生物多样性维护生态保护红线划定方法对比[J].生态学报,2019(19):1-7.
[23] 王效科,欧阳志云,肖寒,等.中国水土流失敏感性分布规律及其区划研究[J].生态学报,2001(1):14-19.
[24] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Ieee Information and Contral, 1965,8:338-353.
[25] 操丽,邓清禄,耿丹,等.基于GIS与模糊逻辑法的川气东送管道地质灾害危险性评价[J].安全与环境工程,2013,20(6):38-42,48.
[26] Graeme F,Bonham-Carter. Geographic information systems for geoscientists. Modelling with GIS.[J]. Pergamon, 1994, 13.
[27] 龙花楼,刘永强,李婷婷,等.生态文明建设视角下土地利用规划与环境保护规划的空间衔接研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(5):1-8.
[25] 杨姗姗,邹长新,沈渭寿,等.基于生态红线划分的生态安全格局构建:以江西省为例[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(1):250-258.
[29] 蒋大林,曹晓峰,匡鸿海,等.生态保护红线及其划定关键问题浅析[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1755-1764.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2020-10-20