[1]LI Long,WU Dafang,LIU Yanyan.Hotspots and Trends of the Researches for Land Use and Ecosystem Service-Based on CiteSpace[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):396-404.
Copy
Hotspots and Trends of the Researches for Land Use and Ecosystem Service-Based on CiteSpace
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 05
Page number:
396-404
Column:
目次
Public date:
2020-08-20
- Title:
- Hotspots and Trends of the Researches for Land Use and Ecosystem Service-Based on CiteSpace
- Keywords:
- land use; ecosystem services; CiteSpace; knowledge map; hotspots and trends
- CLC:
- F301.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- To promote development of domestic land use and ecosystem services, we compared the similarities and differences in relationship between land use and ecosystem services. Based on WOS and CNKI database, 294 and 285 articles were selected, respectively. We used CiteSpace V to analyze the subject and hotspots of researches. The published foreign articles experienced two periods: explosive growth period and stable growth period. We divided keywords into five categories: ecosystem service mechanism, land management and policy, land use and landscape, biodiversity and valuation and indicators. The published articles in China experienced three periods: unstable growth period, rapid growth period and stable growth period. We divided keywords into five categories: ecosystem service value, land use change, ecosystem service, ecosystem service function and land ecology. It is concluded that the future research should be further highlighted in the following aspects: conceptual framework construction, analysis of the mechanism of ecosystem structure-function-process-service formation, relevant discipline system improvement understanding of the dynamic relationship between human activities, land use, ecosystem services and human welfare, quantification, trade-offs and decision, practical innovations in ecological compensation, ecological restoration, land improvement, etc. Moreover, the future researches will be helpful for achieving sustainable and coordinated development of environment, society and economy.
- References:
-
[1]Daily G C. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington Dc:Island Press, 1997.
[2]Costanza R, D'Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The valueof the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:3-15.
[3]Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009,7(1):4-11.
[4]MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and human well-being[M]. Washington DC:Island Press, 2005.
[5]Cowling R M, Egoh B, Knight A T, et al. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation[J]. Pnas, 2008,105(28):9483-9488.
[6]Burkhard B, Crossman N, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4:1-3.
[7]Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,26(1):152-158.
[8]陈能汪,王龙剑,鲁婷.流域生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].生态与农村环境学报,2012,28(2):113-119.
[9]孟范平,李睿倩.基于能值分析的滨海湿地生态系统服务价值定量化研究进展[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(1):74-80.
[10]欧名豪,王坤鹏,郭杰.耕地保护生态补偿机制研究进展[J].农业现代化研究,2019,40(3):357-365.
[11]吴康,李耀川.收缩情境下城市土地利用及其生态系统服务的研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(5):1121-1134.
[12]卢训令,刘俊玲,丁圣彦.农业景观异质性对生物多样性与生态系统服务的影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4602-4614.
[13]曹祺文,卫晓梅,吴健生.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(11):3102-3111.
[14]马琳,刘浩,彭建,等.生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1277-1289.
[15]侯鹏,王桥,申文明,等.生态系统综合评估研究进展:内涵、框架与挑战[J].地理研究,2015,34(10):1809-1823.
[16]戴培超,张绍良,刘润,等.生态系统文化服务研究进展:基于Web of Science分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(5):1863-1875.
[17]黄木易,岳文泽,方斌,等.1970—2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1904-1920.
[18]谭清月,许明祥,李彬彬,等.中国生态系统服务研究发展过程解析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):330-337.
[19]Boyd J, Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services?The need for standardized environmental accounting units[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,63(2):616-626.
[20]Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010,107(11):5242-5247.
[21]Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012,109(19):7565-7570.
[22]Liu J G, Dietz T, Carpenter S R, et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems[J]. Science, 2007,317(5844):1513-1516.
[23]de GrootR S, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010,7(3):260-272.
[24]Bagstad K J, Semmens D J, Waage S, et al. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,5:27-39.
[25]TscharntkeT, Tylianakis J M, Rand T A. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses[J]. Biological Reviews, 2012,87(3):661-685.
[26]Kroll F, Mueller F, Haase D, et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 2012,29(3):521-535.
[27]Ali A, Lin S L, HeJ K. Climate and soils determine aboveground biomass indirectly via species diversity and stand structural complexity in tropical forests[J]. Forest Ecologyand Management, 2019,432:823-831.
[28]Mauerhofer V, Ichinose T, Blackwell B D, et al. Underuse of social-ecological systems:A research agenda for addressing challenges to biocultural diversity[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,72:57-64.
[29]Schirpke U, Candiago S, Vigl, et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Scienceofthe Total Environment, 2019,651(1):928-941.
[30]Holland J E, Bennett A E, Newton A C, et al. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK:A review[J]. Scienceofthe Total Environment, 2018,610:316-332.
[31]ReyBenayas J M, NewtonA C, Diaz A, et al. Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration:A Meta-Analysis[J]. Science, 2009,325(5944):1121-1124.
[32]Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services:Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009,106(5):1305-1312.
[33]Arkema K K, Verutes G M, Wood, et al. Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(24):7390-7395.
[34]Naidoo R, Ricketts T H. Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation[J]. Plos Biology, 2006,4(11):2153-2164.
[35]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[36]邓楚雄,钟小龙,谢炳庚,等.洞庭湖区土地生态系统的服务价值时空变化[J].地理研究,2019,38(4):844-855.
[37]王伟伟,周立华,孙燕,等.禁牧政策对宁夏盐池县农业生态系统服务影响的能值分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(1):146-157.
[38]包贵萍,梁小亮,梁颖,等.南方红壤丘陵耕地生态修复补偿标准研究[J].资源科学,2019,41(2):247-256.
[39]李建龙,师学义.基于熵权灰靶生态系统服务价值模型的土地利用规划环境影响评价:以晋城市为例[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(2):717-725.
[40]王蓓,赵军,胡秀芳.石羊河流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7582-7595.
[41]杨锁华,胡守庚,瞿诗进.1990—2014年长江中游经济带生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):164-169.
[42]刘春芳,薛淑艳,乌亚汗.土地整治的生态环境效应:作用机制及应用路径[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(2):685-693.
[43]石忆邵,史东辉.洞庭湖生态经济区生态服务供需平衡研究[J].地理研究,2018,37(9):1714-1723.
[44]孙艺杰,任志远,郝梦雅,等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素:以延安市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3443-3454.
[45]王丽群,张志强,李格,等.北京边缘地区景观格局变化及对生态系统服务的影响评价:以牛栏山—马坡镇为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):750-759.
[46]曾杰,李江风,姚小薇.武汉城市圈生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(3):883-891.
[47]蒙吉军,王雅,江颂.基于生态系统服务的黑河中游退耕还林生态补偿研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5404-5413.
[48]黄敏,杨飞,郑士伟.中国城镇化进程对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):352-359.
[49]张雪琪,满苏尔·沙比提,马国飞.基于生态足迹改进模型的叶尔羌河平原绿洲生态安全评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(9):840-849.
[50]李颖,冯玉,彭飞,等.基于地理探测器的天津市生态用地格局演变[J].经济地理,2017,37(12):180-189.
[51]宫丽彦,程磊磊,卢琦.荒地的概念、分类及其生态功能解析[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(12):1969-1981.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-08-25