[1]SONG Jiapeng,CHEN Songlin.Coupling Relationship and Coordination Between Recessive Land Use Morphology and Land Eco-security in Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):301-307.
Copy
Coupling Relationship and Coordination Between Recessive Land Use Morphology and Land Eco-security in Fujian Province
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 04
Page number:
301-307
Column:
目次
Public date:
2020-06-20
- Title:
- Coupling Relationship and Coordination Between Recessive Land Use Morphology and Land Eco-security in Fujian Province
- Keywords:
- recessive land use morphology; land-eco Security; land use transition; coupling relationship and coordination; Fujian Province
- CLC:
- F301.24; X24
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- The investigation on transition of recessive land use and its eco-environmental impact strongly benefits the green economy. With the methods of synthetic index model, coupling coordination degree model and Geodetector, we discussed the spatiotemporal pattern, transition mode of recessive land use morphology and its coupling relationship with land eco-security in Fujian Province. The results indicate as follows. The recessive land use morphology index generally is on the rise, and it is gradually developing to a higher level. The recessive land use morphology index of coastal cities decreases from southeastern coastal to northwestern inland area in space. During the research period, land use transition shows characteristics of stages with the transition period showing the S-shaped evolution trend. The overall level of land eco-security in Fujian Province fluctuates and rises, and is closely related to the regional transition stage of recessive land use morphology. The land ecological level in the northwest inland area is higher than that in the southeast coastal area. In the past 15 years, the average coordination degree of coupling between recessive land use morphology and land-eco security in Fujian has increased from 0.44 to 0.61. The coordination of coastal cities is higher than that of inland cities. The major driving forces on the coordination include land use intensity, land output efficiency and endowment of ecological resources. In order to promote coordinated green development among cities, the government should apply recessive land use morphology and its rule of coordinated development with eco-security to land use and implement management policies according to local conditions.
- References:
-
[1] Anke F, Antonia E. Coproduction of ecosystem services as human-nature interactions: An analytical framework[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016,52(3):41-50.
[2] 龙花楼,李秀彬.区域土地利用转型分析:以长江沿线样带为例[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):144-149.
[3] 龙花楼.中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实[J].地理学报,2006,61(10):1093-1100.
[4] 李秀彬.农地利用变化假说与相关的环境效应命题[J].地球科学进展,2008,23(11):1124-1129.
[5] 刘永强,龙花楼.黄淮海平原农区土地利用转型及其动力机制[J].地理学报,2016,71(4):666-679.
[6] Long Hualou, Liu Yongqiang, Hou Xuegang, et al. Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services:Implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China[J]. Habitat International, 2014,44(10):536-554.
[7] Chen Ruishan, Ye Chao, Cai Yunlong, et al. The impact of rural out-migration on land use transition in China:Past, present and trend[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014,40(4):101-110.
[8] 袁悦,井立蛟,杨鸿雁,等.昌黎县土地利用转型对生态环境效应的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):194-201.
[9] 何青泽,谢德体,王三,等.重庆市北碚区土地利用转型及生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):290-296.
[10] 赵丽,张贵军,朱永明,等.基于土地利用转型的土地多功能转变与特征分析:以河北省唐县为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(6):42-50,97.
[11] Long Hualou, Li Tingting. The coupling characteristics and mechanism of farmland and rural housing land transition in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012,22(3):548-562.
[12] Song Xiaoqing, Huang Yuan, Wu Zhifeng, et al. Does cultivated land function transition occur in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015,25(7):51-69.
[13] Zhu Fengkai, Zhang Fengrong, Li Can, et al. Functional transition of the rural settlement:Analysis of land-use differentiation in a transect of Beijing, China[J]. Habitat International, 2014,41(1):262-271.
[14] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138.
[15] 杨永春,杨晓娟.1949—2005年中国河谷盆地型大城市空间扩展与土地利用结构转型:以兰州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(1):37-49.
[16] 曲艺,龙花楼.城市土地利用隐性形态空间分异及其影响因素:以中国289个地级以上城市为例[J].经济地理,2016,36(10):1-8.
[17] 曲艺,龙花楼.基于开发利用与产出视角的区域土地利用隐性形态综合研究:以黄淮海地区为例[J].地理研究,2017,36(1):61-73.
[18] 程建,程久苗.中国省际土地利用隐性形态时空格局、驱动力与转型模式[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(12):60-68,97.
[19] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J].地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618.
[20] 林耀奔,叶艳妹,杨建辉.浙江省城市土地利用集约化与生态化协调性评价[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(1):65-72.
[21] 王振山,张绍良,陈浮,等.城市土地集约利用与生态利用灰色关联分析[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(4):121-124,135.
[22] 王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1698-1713.
[23] 王枫,董玉祥.广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J].资源科学,2015,37(11):2179-2192.
[24] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[25] 戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究:以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2098-2109.
[26] 郭亚军,易平涛.线性无量纲化方法的性质分析[J].统计研究,2008,25(2):93-100.
[27] 张浩,冯淑怡,曲福田.耕地保护、建设用地集约利用与城镇化耦合协调性研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(6):1002-1015.
[28] Valerie I. The Penguin Dictionary of Physics[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1996.
[29] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-07-09