PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]WANG Le,HE Pingru,ZHANG Hongling,et al.Effects of Straw Burying and Film Mulching on Soil Water-Salt and Yield of Tomato[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):372-378.

Copy

Effects of Straw Burying and Film Mulching on Soil Water-Salt and Yield of Tomato

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 27 Number of periods: 2020 03 Page number: 372-378 Column: 目次 Public date: 2020-04-20

Title:: Effects of Straw Burying and Film Mulching on Soil Water-Salt and Yield of Tomato

Author(s):: WANG Le¹, HE Pingru², ZHANG Hongling¹, ZHANG Na¹, DU Bin¹; (1.Ningxia Institute of Water Resources Research, Yinchuan 750021, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of ministry of Education/Institute of Water-saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China)

Keywords:: straw; film mulching; field experiment; soil salt; tomato

CLC:: S156.4

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In view of the shortage of irrigation water resources and soil salinization in Ningxia Yinhuang irrigation area, the present study was conducted from August 2018 to March 2019, to study the effects of film mulching and straw burying on soil moisture, nutrient, soil salt and tomato yield. Four treatments were settled: T₁(film mulching and straw burying), T₂(no film mulching but straw burying), T₃(film mulching but no straw burying), T₄(no film mulching and no straw burying). Results indicated that, the soil moisture of 0—20 cm layer during tomato growth period followed T₁>T₂>T₃>T₄, both the film mulching and straw burying contributed to the improvement of soil water storage capacity in 0—40 cm layer and the restraining of salt accumulation in topsoil. Especially, combination measures of film mulching and straw burying had significant influence on moisture conservation and salinity control in 0—40 cm layer, taking T₄ treatment as comparison, the capacity of salinity controlling for T₁ treatment increased by 27.94%; straw burying can improve the soil nutrient in 0—40 cm layer effectively; comparing the measure of no film mulching and no straw burying, the irrigation water use efficiency and tomato yield were improved for the combination measure of film mulching and straw burying. Considering the moisture conservation, soil salinity control and tomato yield, the combination of film mulching and straw burying was suggested for tomato cultivation in Ningxia Yanghuang irrigation area, the tomato yield increased by 13.65% and irrigation water saved by 23.08%, compared to the measure of no film mulching and no straw burying.

References:: [1] 王蓉,马玲,黄灵丹,等.宁夏旱作区日光温室秋冬茬樱桃番茄灌溉制度研究[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(33):65.
[2] 董平,陈淑娟,朱建祥,等.石嘴山市惠农区脱水蔬菜推荐施肥方案的建立及应用[J].现代农业科技,2015(24):115-117.
[3] Cuartero J, Fernández-Muñoz R. Tomato and salinity[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1998,78(1/4):83-125.
[4] Li N, Xu X Y, Jiang J B, et al. Bioinformatics resources for tomato research [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2010,45(1):95-101.
[5] 夏国军.秸秆层隔治盐研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(15):4454-4454.
[6] Bernstein L. Salt tolerance of plants[M]. US Department of Agriculture, 1964.
[7] Mulumba L N, Lal R. Mulching effects on selected soil physical properties[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008,98(1):106-111.
[8] 毕远杰,王全九,雪静.覆盖及水质对土壤水盐状况及油葵产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):83-89.
[9] 王会,何伟,段福建,等.秸秆还田对盐渍土团聚体稳定性及碳氮含量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(4):124-131.
[10] Stagnari F, Galieni A, Speca S, et al. Effects of straw mulch on growth and yield of durum wheat during transition to Conservation Agriculture in Mediterranean environment[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014,167:51-63.
[11] 乔海龙,刘小京,李伟强,等.秸秆深层覆盖对水分入渗及蒸发的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(2):34-38.
[12] Sims A L, Schepers J S, Olson R A, et al. Irrigated corn yield and nitrogen accumulation response in a comparison of no-till and conventional till:Tillage and surface-residue variables[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1998,90(5):630-637.
[13] 王小彬,蔡典雄,张镜清,等.旱地玉米秸秆还田对土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(4):54-61.
[14] 颜丽,宋杨,贺靖,等.玉米秸秆还田时间和还田方式对土壤肥力和作物产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2004,35(2):143-148.
[15] 田慎重,李增嘉,宁堂原,等.保护性耕作对农田土壤不同养分形态的影响[J].青岛农业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,25(3):171-176.
[16] 李昌珍,张婷婷,杨改河,等.秸秆覆盖和施肥对关中灌区夏玉米生长后期土壤呼吸速率的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(3):411-416.
[17] 侯贤清,李荣,吴鹏年,等.秸秆还田配施氮肥对土壤碳氮含量与玉米生长的影响[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(9):238-246.
[18] Turmel M S, Speratti A, Baudron F, et al. Crop residue management and soil health:A systems analysis[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2015,134:6-16.
[19] 李新举,刘勋岭.秸秆覆盖对土壤水盐运动的影响[J].山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,2000,31(1):38-40.
[20] Li S X, Wang Z H, Li S Q, et al. Effect of plastic sheet mulch, wheat straw mulch, and maize growth on water loss by evaporation in dryland areas of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013,116:39-49.
[21] 赵永敢,王婧,李玉义,等.秸秆隔层与地覆膜盖有效抑制潜水蒸发和土壤返盐[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(23):109-117.
[22] 孙博,解建仓,汪妮,等.秸秆覆盖对盐渍化土壤水盐动态的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(4):180-184.
[23] 周勤利,王学东,李志涛,等.宁夏贺兰县土壤重金属分布特征及其生态风险评价[J].农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(4):513-521.
[24] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[25] Liu X, Zheng J, Zhang D, et al. Biochar has no effect on soil respiration across Chinese agricultural soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,554:259-265.
[26] 赵永敢.“上膜下秸”调控河套灌区盐渍土水盐运移过程与机理[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2014.
[27] 杨阳.“上膜下秸”技术:生态改良进行时:访中国农业科学院农业资源与区划研究所逄焕成研究员[J].中国农村科技,2018(11):17-21.
[28] 丛艳静.连续3年玉米秸秆还田对土壤理化性状及作物产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(17):95-98.
[29] 胡心意,傅庆林,刘琛,等.秸秆还田和耕作深度对稻田耕层土壤的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2018,30(7):1202-1210.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2020-04-30