[1]DUAN Yanan,JI Xuan,GUO Ruoyu,et al.Analysis on the Sensitivity and Dominant Meteorological Factors Identification of Potential Evapotranspiration Variation in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):261-268.
Copy
Analysis on the Sensitivity and Dominant Meteorological Factors Identification of Potential Evapotranspiration Variation in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 02
Page number:
261-268
Column:
Public date:
2020-03-30
- Title:
- Analysis on the Sensitivity and Dominant Meteorological Factors Identification of Potential Evapotranspiration Variation in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin
- Keywords:
- potential evapotranspiration; Penman-Monteith; dominant meteorological factor; Yarlung Zangbo River Basin; international river
- CLC:
- P426.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Analysis on the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration is one of the basic research topics of water cycle respons to climate change. Based on the ground meteorological data in the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin, we calculated the daily potential evapotranspiration from 1961 to 2012 by using the Penman-Monteith formula, and analyzed its temporal and spatial distribution characteristics. On these bases, the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to four meteorological factors(average temperature, wind speed, solar radiation, and relative humidity)and the contribution rate of each meteorological factor to the variation of potential evapotranspiration were also calculated, and then the more sensitive factor and the dominant factor were identified. The results showed that:(1)from 1961 to 2012, the potential evapotranspiration in the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin presented the significantly increasing trend with an increase of 8.81 mm/decade; the annual potential evapotranspiration had obvious spatial distribution characteristics that was higher in mid-stream valley than in other regions;(2)with respect to most regions of the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin, the potential evapotranspiration was more sensitive to solar radiation, and followed by average temperature, relative humidity, wind speed; and the contribution rate of each meteorological factor decreased in the order: average temperature>wind speed>relative humidity>solar radiation. In general, the average temperature was the leading factor responsible for the change of the potential evapotranspiration in the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin between 1961 and 2012.
- References:
-
[1] 刘昌明,张丹.中国地表潜在蒸散发敏感性的时空变化特征分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):579-588.
[2] 杨志刚,唐小萍,路红亚,等.近50年雅鲁藏布江流域潜在蒸散量的变化特征[J].地理学报,2013,68(9):1263-1268.
[3] 尹云鹤,吴绍洪,戴尔阜.1971—2008年我国潜在蒸散时空演变的归因[J].科学通报,2010,55(22):2226-2234.
[4] 李英杰,延军平,王鹏涛.北方农牧交错带参考作物蒸散量时空变化与成因分析[J].中国农业气象,2016,37(2):166-173.
[5] 环海军,杨再强,刘岩,等.鲁中地区参考作物蒸散量时空变化特征及主要气象因子的贡献分析[J].中国农业气象,2015,36(6):692-698.
[6] 钱多,查天山,吴斌,等.毛乌素沙地参考作物蒸散量变化特征与成因分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(6):1966-1974.
[7] 靳晓言,陈艺冉,郭嘉琛,等.若尔盖湿地潜在蒸散时空动态特征及影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):234-239.
[8] Yin Y, Wu S, Chen G, et al. Attribution analyses of potential evapotranspiration changes in China since the 1960s[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2010,101(1/2):19-28.
[9] 谢平,龙怀玉,张杨珠,等.云南省四季潜在蒸散量时空演变的主导气象因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):184-193.
[10] 安彬,肖薇薇.1955—2015年陕西省潜在蒸散量时空变化特征及成因[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):146-151.
[11] 杨艳娟,曹经福,熊明明,等.影响海河流域参考作物蒸散量的气象因子定量分析[J].干旱气象,2017,35(3):367-373.
[12] 谢平,龙怀玉,张杨珠,等.近31年来云南省潜在蒸散量变化成因[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(5):77-84.
[13] 冯禹,崔宁博,魏新平,等.川中丘陵区参考作物蒸散量时空变化特征与成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(14):78-86.
[14] 唐小萍,罗礼洪,卓玛,等.气候变化对西藏雅鲁藏布江中游地区潜在蒸散量的影响分析[J].高原山地气象研究,2011,31(3):49-53.
[15] 刘剑,姚治君,陈传友.雅鲁藏布江径流变化趋势及原因分析[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(3):471-477.
[16] 付新峰,杨胜天,刘昌明.雅鲁藏布江流域NDVI时空分布及与站点气候因子的关系[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(3):229-232.
[17] 黄俊雄,徐宗学,巩同梁.雅鲁藏布江径流演变规律及其驱动因子分析[J].水文,2007,27(5):31-35.
[18] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration(Guidelines for computing crop water requirements)[M]. Rome, Italy: Fao, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.56,1998.
[19] 杨林山,李常斌,王帅兵,等.洮河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(11):102-109.
[20] Irmak S, Asce M, Payero J O, et al. Sensitivity Analyses and Sensitivity Coefficients of Standardized Daily ASCE-Penman-Monteith Equation[J]. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 2006,132(6):564-578.
[21] Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, et al. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002,27(9):645-654.
[22] 董煜,陈学刚.新疆参考作物蒸散量敏感性分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(8):82-86.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-02-25