PDF Download

[1]TANG Feng,YIN Yanling,ZHANG Pengtao,et al.Research on Ecosystem Service Value and Carbon Emission Risk of Gaoyang County Based on Land Use Change[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(04):265-271.

Copy

Research on Ecosystem Service Value and Carbon Emission Risk of Gaoyang County Based on Land Use Change

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 04 Page number: 265-271 Column: Public date: 2019-06-11

Title:: Research on Ecosystem Service Value and Carbon Emission Risk of Gaoyang County Based on Land Use Change

Author(s):: TANG Feng¹, YIN Yanling², ZHANG Pengtao^1,3, BAI Ning¹; 1. College of Land and Resources, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei 071001, China;
2. Gaoyang County Federation of Industry and Commerce, Gaoyang, Hebei 071500, China;
3. Key Lab for Farmland Eco-Environment of Hebei Province, Baoding, Hebei 071001, China

Keywords:: land use change; ecosystem service value; land carbon emission risk; Gaoyang County

CLC:: F301.2;X171

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Study of the changes of regional ecosystem service value and land carbon emission risk under land use change has great significance for understanding the ecological environment response of land use change, promoting the coordinated development of regional economy and environment, and achieving low carbon land use. We took Gaoyang County as the research area. Based on the land use data of 2009 and 2016, we used the grid method to divide the evaluation unit, and used the model method to quantitatively evaluate the ecosystem service value and land carbon emission risk, then analyzed the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics, and finally analyzed the correlation between the two. The results showed that the characteristics of land use change in Gaoyang County were the rapid expansion of construction land and the reduction of ecological land use such as water area from 2009 to 2016. The ecosystem services value was generally low and declined during the study period, it was higher in eastern and central areas of the county than the western area. The land carbon emission risk was generally low but rose during the study period, it was higher in the western and central areas of the county than the north and southeast area. There was a significant negative correlation between the land carbon emission risk and the ecosystem service value, indicating the possibility of application of ecosystem service analysis to land use carbon emission research.

References:: [1] 熊鹰,张方明,龚长安,等.LUCC影响下湖南省生态系统服务价值时空演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(6):1397-1408.
[2] 马晓哲,王铮.土地利用变化对区域碳源汇的影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2015,35(17):5898-5907.
[3] Costanza R, D’Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. World Environment, 1997,25(1):3-15.
[4] 赵士洞, 张永明. 生态系统评估的概念、内涵及挑战-介绍《生态系统与人类福利:评估框架》[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(4):650-657.
[5] Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, et al. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011,11(2):676-687.
[6] Groot R D, Brander L, Ploeg S V D, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012,1(1):50-61.
[7] Wei S, Deng X Z, Yuan Y W, et al. Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015,318(24):245-253.
[8] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
[9] Gos P, Lavorel S. Stakeholders’expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity[J]. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 2012,8(1):1-14.
[10] 张皓玮,方斌,魏巧巧,等.区域耕地生态价值补偿量化模型构建:以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(1):63-70.
[11] 李涛,甘德欣,杨知建,等.土地利用变化影响下洞庭湖地区生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(12):3787-3796.
[12] 汤峰,张蓬涛,张贵军,等.基于生态敏感性和生态系统服务价值的昌黎县生态廊道构建[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(8):2675-2684.
[13] 袁凯华,梅昀,陈银蓉,等.中国建设用地集约利用与碳排放效率的时空演变与影响机制[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1882-1895.
[14] 王渊刚,罗格平,冯异星,等.近50 a玛纳斯河流域土地利用/覆被变化对碳储量的影响[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(6):994-1006.
[15] 李玉玲,李世平,祁静静.陕西省土地利用碳排放影响因素及脱钩效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):382-390.
[16] 文枫,鲁春阳.重庆市土地利用碳排放效应时空格局分异[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):257-262.
[17] 赖力.中国土地利用碳排放效益研究[D].南京:南京大学,2010.
[18] 周璟茹,赵华甫,吴金华.关中城市群土地集约利用与碳排放关系演化特征研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(11):55-61.
[19] 路昌,雷国平,周浩,等.松嫩平原肇源县土地利用结构低碳优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):310-315.
[20] 魏媛,吴长勇.喀斯特贫困山区土地利用碳排放效应及风险研究:以贵州省为例[J].生态经济,2018,34(3):31-36.
[21] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-915.
[22] 宗跃光,陈红春,郭瑞华,等.地域生态系统服务的价值结构分析[J].地理研究,2000,19(2):148-155.
[23] 李晓赛,朱永明,赵丽,等.基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(3):373-381.
[24] 王宗明,梁银丽.植被净第一性生产力模型研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(2):104-107.
[25] Wilson M A, Carpenter S R. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States:1971-1997[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999,9(3):772-783.
[26] 李金昌.生态价值论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999.
[27] Cai Z C, Kang G D, Tsuruta H, et al. Estimate of CH4 emission from year-round flooded rice field during rice growing seasons in China[J]. Pedosphere, 2005,15(1):66-71.
[28] 方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等.1981-2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J].中国科学,2007,37(6):804-812.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01