PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Xuesong,ZHANG Maomao,WANG Quanxi,et al.Evaluation on the Comprehensive Benefit of Land Consolidation in Suizhou City Based on CW-GRAP Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):318-324.

Copy

Evaluation on the Comprehensive Benefit of Land Consolidation in Suizhou City Based on CW-GRAP Model

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 03 Page number: 318-324 Column: Public date: 2019-04-12

Title:: Evaluation on the Comprehensive Benefit of Land Consolidation in Suizhou City Based on CW-GRAP Model

Author(s):: ZHANG Xuesong^1,2, ZHANG Maomao^1,2, WANG Quanxi³, LI Deshou^1,2, HE Ju^1,2, HOU Rui⁴; 1. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
2. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
3. College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
4. The College of Earth Science and Resource, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China

Keywords:: land consolidation; benefit evaluation; combination weighting method; grey relation analytic process; rural revitalization strategy; Suizhou City

CLC:: F301.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The more scientific land remediation comprehensive benefit evaluation is of great significance to land remediation strategic deployment. Taking land remediation in Suizhou city of Hubei Province as an example,we try to make beneficial exploration for land remediation benefit evaluation research. The combined weighting method was adopted to improve the accuracy and reliability of weight, and the comprehensive benefit of land remediation in Suizhou was analyzed and evaluated by using the grey relational analysis. The benefit of land consolidation was significant in Suizhou City, but significant difference among counties. The correlation degree of economic, social and ecological benefits of land consolidation in Suixian County were 0.300 9, 0.276 3 and 0.256 1, respectively. The correlation degree of economic, social and ecological benefits of land consolidation in Guangshui city were 0.289 4, 0.253 1 and 0.249 2, respectively. The correlation degree of single economic, social and ecological benefits of land consolidation in Zengdu District was 0.270 0, 0.248 4 and 0.269 4, respectively. The correlation degree of comprehensive benefits in Suixian, Guangshui and Zengdu districts were 0.281 4, 0.266 6 and 0.261 8, respectively. On the whole, the ecological benefits of land remediation were relatively poor. Except that the ecological benefits of the former capital area were slightly higher than the social benefits, the ecological benefits of the other two places lagged behind with the economic and social benefits. The CW-GRAP model takes into account the fuzzy characteristics of land improvement benefit evaluation, and is a feasible research method, which can provide references for the study of evaluation on land improvement benefit in northwest Hubei Province.

References:: [1] 魏洪斌,罗明,鞠正山,等.中国土地整治"十二五"研究重点评述与"十三五"研究展望[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):371-377.
[2] 万婷,张淼.基于乡村振兴战略的土地整治综述及发展趋势研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,5(5):1-6.
[3] 林火灿.以乡村振兴战略带动城乡融合发展:访中国城镇化促进会党委书记、副会长兼理事长陈炎兵[N].经济日报,2017-12-28(5).
[4] 秦中春.实施乡村振兴战略的意义与重点[J].新经济导刊,2017(12):80-85.
[5] Long H L. Land consolidation:An indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014,24(2):211-225.
[6] 高云才.聚焦十九大报告:新时代乡村如何振兴[N].人民日报,2017-11-03.
[7] 黄辉玲,吴次芳,张守忠.黑龙江省土地整治规划效益分析与评价[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):240-246.
[8] 国土资源部.国家发展和改革委员会关于印发《全国土地整治规划(2016-2020年)》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zwgk/zytz/.201702/t20170215_1440315.htm, 2017-01-10.
[9] 曾涛,吕婧,史佳良,等.基于多层AHP-FCE评价模型的土地整治重大工程效益评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2017,39(6):1234-1243.
[10] Guo B B, Jin X B, Yang X H, et al. Determining the effects of land consolidation on the multifunctionlity of the cropland production system in China using a SPA-fuzzy assessment model[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015,63:12-26.
[11] 樊敏,刘耀林,吴艳娟,等.基于云模型的土地整理生态影响评价研究[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2008,33(9):986-989.
[12] 胡学东,王占岐,童秋英,等.基于生态和社会经济约束的区域土地整治潜力评价研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(5):804-812.
[13] 邓胜华,梅昀,胡伟艳.基于模糊模型识别的石碑坪镇土地整理社会生态效益评价[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(3):72-75.
[14] 罗文斌,吴次芳.中国农村土地整理绩效区域差异及其影响机理分析[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(6):35-41.
[15] 时俊,张丽旭,刘鹏霞,等.组合权重法在长江口生态评价系统中的应用[J].海洋环境科学,2011,30(2):255-258.
[16] 杨庆育,李明.基于灰色关联分析法的区域自主创新能力实证测度:以重庆市为例[J].软科学,2011,25(1):91-94.
[17] 刘思峰,蔡华,杨英杰,等.灰色关联分析模型研究进展[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(8):2041-2046.
[18] 乔蕻强,谢忠泰,程文仕,等.基于DEA-Gini准则的土地整治项目效益评价:以甘肃省庆阳市为例[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):132-136.
[19] 雷娜,韩霁昌,王欢元,等.基于模糊综合评价模型的土地整理效益评价[J].中国水土保持,2015(10):68-71.
[20] 王万茂.土地整理的产生、内容和效益[J].中国土地,1997,11(9):20-22.
[21] 严金明,夏方舟,马梅.中国土地整治转型发展战略导向研究[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(2):3-10.
[22] 范金梅,王磊,薛永森.土地整理效益评价探析[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(S1):116-118.
[23] 张正峰.湖北省天门市土地整治效应评估研究[J].地域研究与开发,2013,32(1):123-127.
[24] Cheng W S, Du Z Q, Cao C, et al. Assessing rural land consolidation based on ecosystem service:A Case study of Qingyang in Westrn China[J]. Remote Sensing and Smart City, 2015,64:423-439.
[25] 顿耀龙,王军,郭义强,等.基于AHP-FCE模型的大安市土地整理可持续性评价[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(8):57-64.
[26] 荣联伟,师学义.基于AHP和熵权法的县域耕地整理潜力评价[J].江西农业大学学报,2014,36(2):454-462.
[27] 吕雪娇,肖武,李素萃,等.基于GIS与灰色星座聚类的巢湖流域土地整治分区[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(6):253-262.
[28] 朱峰,张宏伟.基于"AHP+熵权法"的CW-TOPSIS冲击地压评判模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(1):128-133.
[29] 樊天相,杨庆媛,何建,等.重庆丘陵地区农村居民点空间布局优化:以长寿区海棠镇为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(5):883-894.
[30] 张瑞,高阳.基于灰色关联模型的内蒙古自治区土地整治综合效益分类[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(5):31-40.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01