PDF Download

[1]HAO Na,WANG Xiaoqing,WANG Yao,et al.Characteristics of Cultivated Land Map and the Change of Its Ecological Service Value in Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):277-283.

Copy

Characteristics of Cultivated Land Map and the Change of Its Ecological Service Value in Hebei Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 06 Page number: 277-283 Column: Public date: 2018-10-26

Title:: Characteristics of Cultivated Land Map and the Change of Its Ecological Service Value in Hebei Province

Author(s):: HAO Na¹, WANG Xiaoqing², WANG Yao², ZHANG Di², NIU Zhijun², QI Yuepu³; 1. Qinhuangdao Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, China;
2. Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Heibei 071000, China;
3. Shijiazhuang Fellow Land Environmental Technology Service Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China

Keywords:: farmland; mapping characteristics; value of ecological services; Hebei Province

CLC:: F301.21

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to respond to the call of ‘quantity—quality—ecology’ for the development of cultivated land, this paper takes Hebei Province as an example, using ArcGIS 10.2 from the perspective of cultivated land mapping characteristics change, such as early change, late change, repeated change and persistence changes of ecosystem services value in cultivated land under four patterns of change. The results showed that the cultivated area increased by 4 331 555.45 hm² in the study area from 2004 to 2016, and the value of ecological service was increased by 28.771 billion yuan. The main changes were mainly ‘cultivated land—grassland-grassland’, where ecosystem services value increased 385.997 8 million yuan. The main type of later change is ‘cultivated land—cultivated land—grassland’, which is the largest type of monomer change in the whole change pattern, and the ecosystem services value is increased by 856.510 1 million yuan. The change type of repeatedly changes mainly focuses on the change type of ‘cultivated land—grassland—cultivated land’, and the ecosystem services value is the largest increase in the type of change. The pattern of continuous change is mainly based on the model of ‘cultivated land—gardenland—grassland’, the cultivated land turning to garden ecosystem services value increased by 400.446 1 million yuan, and the garden land turned to grassland ecosystem services value decreased by 55.856 1 million yuan. The results show that the ecosystem services value of cultivated land in Hebei Province is on the increase, which is closely related to the conversion between the garden and the grassland.

References:: [1] 蔡璐.论社会发展与土地资源的保护[J].资源与人居环境,2009(2):54-55.
[2] 牛志君,王晓晴,封乾,等.河北省土地利用变化图谱特征分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(10):54-62,80.
[3] Edmondson J L, Davies Z G, Mccormack S A, et al. Land-cover effects on soil organic carbon stocks in a European city[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014,472:444-453.
[4] 张舟,吴次芳,谭荣.生态系统服务价值在土地利用变化研究中的应用:瓶颈和展望[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(2):556-562.
[5] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
[6] 郝慧梅,任志远.基于生态服务价值的土地利用/覆盖变化生态效应测评[J].资源科学,2010,29(6):90-97.
[7] Costanza R. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,38(7):253-260.
[8] 欧阳志云,王如松.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-639.
[9] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[10] Verburg P H, Schulp C J E, Witte N, et al. Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2006,114(1):39-56.
[11] Yoshimura A, Dokyu N, Kurosawa T, et al. Impact of land-use map color coding on area characteristics judgments[J]. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 2014,49(3):585-590.
[12] 孙慧兰,李卫红,陈亚鹏,等.新疆伊犁河流域生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):887-894.
[13] 顾泽贤,赵筱青,高翔宇,等.澜沧县景观格局变化及其生态系统服务价值评价[J].生态科学,2016,35(5):143-153.
[14] 马士彬,张勇荣,安裕伦.山区城市土地利用动态空间分布特征:以贵州省六盘水市为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(3):489-496.
[15] 胡和兵,刘红玉,郝敬峰,等.城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2565-2576.
[16] 阳文锐,李锋,王如松,等.城市土地利用的生态服务功效评价方法:以常州市为例[J].生态学报,2013,33(14):4486-4494.
[17] 彭资,谷成燕,刘智勇,等.东江流域1989-2009年土地利用变化对生态承载力的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(7):675-686.
[18] 常雄凯,刘淼,李春林,等.辽宁沿海土地利用变化的图谱特征[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(12):3459-3465.
[19] 王亮.平谭岛土地利用/土地覆被信息图谱分析研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2013.
[20] 吕晓,史洋洋,黄贤金,等.江苏省土地利用变化的图谱特征[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1077-1084.
[21] 王金亮,邵景安,李阳兵.近20 a三峡库区农林地利用变化图谱特征分析[J].自然资源学报,2015(2):235-247.
[22] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015(8):1243-1254.
[23] 李晓赛.县域尺度生态系统服务价值动态评估研究:以青龙满族自治县为例[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2015.
[24] 彭文甫,周介铭,杨存建,等.基于土地利用变化的四川省生态系统服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(7):1011-1020.
[25] 杜金龙.土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值影响研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010.
[26] 蔡中华,王晴,刘广青.中国生态系统服务价值的再计算[J].生态经济,2014,30(2):16-18,23.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01