PDF Download

[1]YANG Shutong,SHI Peng,LI Zhanbin,et al.Effect of Grain for Green Project on Ecosystem Service in Dali River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):251-258.

Copy

Effect of Grain for Green Project on Ecosystem Service in Dali River Basin

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 06 Page number: 251-258 Column: Public date: 2018-10-26

Title:: Effect of Grain for Green Project on Ecosystem Service in Dali River Basin

Author(s):: YANG Shutong¹, SHI Peng¹, LI Zhanbin^1,2, LI Peng¹, ZHANG Yi¹, ZHONG Shaohua¹; 1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Keywords:: Grain for Green Project; carbon storage; soil conservation; water conservation; Dali River Basin

CLC:: Q148

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The effect of Grain for Green Project on ecosystem service was evaluated by the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model in the Dali River Basin. The land use/land cover data of 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 years were used to calculate the ecosystem services of carbon storage, soil conservation and water conservation. Under the Grain for Green Project, ecosystem services mainly increased in the basin. The main conclusions were as follows. (1) In the past 30 years, the land use/land cover of the study area changed significantly, that forest and urban areas increased by 31.52 km² and 0.65 km², respectively, while the areas of farmland, grassland and water body decreased by 2.49 km², 27.32 km² and 2.36 km², respectively. (2) Carbon storage volume had steadily increased in the 30 years. Forestland had the most significant carbon sequestration, followed by grassland, and the farmland. (3) Soil conservation mainly increased in the basin. The soil conservation capacity of farmland was obviously lower than those of woodland and grassland. (4) Water conservation little decreased in the study area in the past few decades. The water conservation not only depended on the land use/land cover, but also the annual rainfall. This study evaluates the effect Grain for Green Project on ecosystem service of Dali River Basin, which can provide scientific reference for future ecological planning.

References:: [1] 张振中,苏斌.陕西黄土高原生态重建理论体系探讨[J].国土与自然资源研究,2010(3):52-53.
[2] 刘建军,崔宏安,王得祥,等.延安市张梁试区退耕地植被自然恢复与多样性变化[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(3):8-11.
[3] 刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19.
[4] 张琨,吕一河,傅伯杰.黄土高原典型区植被恢复及其对生态系统服务的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(1):23-31.
[5] 李屹峰,罗跃初,刘纲,等.土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响:以密云水库流域为例[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):726-736.
[6] 陈海鹏,窦苗.基于InVEST模型的云南小江流域生态系统碳储量及空间格局研究[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(12):51-54.
[7] 胡胜,曹明明,刘琪,等.不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2393-2406.
[8] 李天宏,郑丽娜.基于RUSLE模型的延河流域2001-2010年土壤侵蚀动态变化[J].自然资源学报,2012(7):1164-1175.
[9] 包玉斌.基于InVEST模型的陕北黄上高原生态服务功能时空变化研究[D].西安:西北大学,2015.
[10] 余新晓,周彬,吕锡芝,等.基于InVEST模型的北京山区森林水源涵养功能评估[J].林业科学,2012,48(10):1-5.
[11] 沈中原,李占斌,朱冰冰,等.基于GIS的流域土地利用地形分异性特征研究[J].西安理工大学学报,2009,25(1):28-32.
[12] 李敏.基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能评价研究:以北京延庆为例[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[13] 张岩,袁建平,刘宝元.土壤侵蚀预报模型中的植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1033-1036.
[14] 谢红霞,杨勤科,李锐,等.延河流域水土保持措施减蚀效应分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(4):13-19.
[15] 史建国,严昌荣,何文清,等.黄河流域潜在蒸散量时空格局变化分析[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(6):41-46.
[16] 高歌,陈德亮,任国玉,等.1956-2000年中国潜在蒸散量变化趋势[J].地理研究,2006,25(3):378-387.
[17] 郭兆元.陕西土壤[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.
[18] 彭怡.InVEST模型在生态系统服务功能评估中的应用研究:以四川汶川地震灾区为例[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2010.
[19] 傅斌,徐佩,王玉宽,等.都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):789-797.
[20] 罗西超.黄土高原淤地坝建设现状及其发展思路[J].中国水土保持,2016(9):24-25.
[21] 孙新章,谢高地,甄霖.泾河流域退耕还林(草)综合效益与生态补偿趋向[J].资源科学,2007,29(2):194-200.
[22] 范建忠,李登科,周辉.陕西省退耕还林固碳释氧价值分析[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(4):874-881.
[23] 亢伟.大理河流域坡面水土保持措施减沙作用及其变化过程研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2008.
[24] Changhong Su, Bojie Fu. Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2013,101(1):119-128.
[25] Bojie Fu, Shuai Wang, Changhong Su, et al. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013,5(1):4-10.
[26] Hua Zheng, Yifeng Li, Brian E Robinson, et al. Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices[J]. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2016,14(10):527-532.
[27] 李琰,李双成,高阳,等.连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架[J].地理学报,2013,68(8):1038-1047.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01