PDF Download

[1]LIU Xiaona,PEI Sha,CHEN Long,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model in Mentougou District of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):168-176.

Copy

Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model in Mentougou District of Beijing

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 06 Page number: 168-176 Column: Public date: 2018-10-26

Title:: Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model in Mentougou District of Beijing

Author(s):: LIU Xiaona, PEI Sha, CHEN Long, LIU Chunlan; National Urban Environmental Pollution Control Engineering Research Center, Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environment Protection, Beijing 100037, China

Keywords:: soil conservation function; ecosystem services; InVEST model; land use and land cover change; Mentougou District

CLC:: S157.1;Q149

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Soil erosion caused by unreasonable land resources development has become a hotspot in mountain ecosystem. Based on temporal and spatial analysis of land use and land cover changes (LUCC) between 2005 and 2013, soil conservation service of ecosystem based on InVEST model in Mentougou District of Beijing, which was pure mountainous areas with ecological conservation and soil erosion characteristics, was analyzed quantitatively and evaluated dynamically. The results showed that: (1) the acreages of cultivated land, forestland, waterbody and unused land presented the decreasing trend in contrast to garden plot, grassland, construction land from 2005 to 2013; and the cultivated land was the fastest decreasing type, and was mainly converted into garden plot, forestland and construction land, respectively; meanwhile, the garden plot was the fastest growing type, and was mainly derived from cultivated land and forest land; (2) both the soil conservation ability and capacity of Mentougou ecosystem increased during 2005—2013, annual per unit area of soil conservation capacity raised from 87.41 t/hm² to 113.56 t/hm²; total soil conservation increased by 3.773 8 million t, while reduced soil erosion was 0.234 2 million t; the capacity of soil conservation in northwest and northeast showed the upward trend, a decreasing trend in southwest, and unchanged in the eastern region; (3) the soil conservation capacity per unit area decreased in the order: forestland > grassland > unused land > construction land > cultivated land > garden plot > waterbody, between 2005 and 2013, soil conservation capacity per unit area of different land use and land cover types tended to increase; the unused land had the fastest growth rate in soil conservation function, while waterbody presented the slowest growth rate; in addition to cultivated land, the total amount of soil conservation of other types showed the increasing trend.

References:: [1] Costanza R, D’Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. World Environment, 1999,387(1):3-15.
[2] Daily G C. Nature’s services:societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington DC:Island Press, 1997.
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being[M]. Washington DC:Island Press, 2005.
[4] Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, et al. Resilience and sustainable development:Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations[J]. Ambio, 2002,31(5):437-440.
[5] Swetnam R D, Fisher B, Mbilinyi B P, et al. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change:A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011,92(3):563-574.
[6] Li T, Li W, Qian Z. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(7):1427-1435.
[7] Wang W J, Guo H C, Chuai X W et al. The impact of land use change on the temporospatial variations of ecosystems services value in China and an optimized land use solution[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2014,44(2):62-72.
[8] 王雅,蒙吉军.黑河中游土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(1):200-207.
[9] Wischmeier W H, Johnson C B, Cross B V. Soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites[J]. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 1971,26(5):189-193.
[10] 肖玉,谢高地,安凯.青藏高原生态系统土壤保持功能及其价值[J].生态学报,2003,23(11):2367-2378.
[11] 胡胜,曹明明,刘琪,等.不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2393-2406.
[12] 蔡强国,刘纪根.关于我国土壤侵蚀模型研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(3):142-150.
[13] 张喜旺,周月敏,李晓松,等.土壤侵蚀评价遥感研究进展[J].土壤通报,2010,41(4):1010-1017.
[14] 黄从红,杨军,张文娟.生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(12):3360-3367.
[15] 王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究:以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):184-189.
[16] 韩永伟,高吉喜,拓学森,等.门头沟生态系统土壤保持功能及其生态经济价值分析[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(5):144-147.
[17] 张玉虎,李义禄,贾海峰.永定河流域门头沟区景观生态安全格局评价[J].干旱区地理,2013,36(6):1049-1057.
[18] 黄从红.基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
[19] 冯朝阳,高吉喜,韩永伟,等.京西门头沟区典型生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):230-234.
[20] 周彬,余新晓,陈丽华,等.基于InVEST模型的北京山区土壤侵蚀模拟[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):9-13.
[21] 北京市水务局,北京市统计局.北京市第一次水务普查公报[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[22] 北京市门头沟区统计局.北京市门头沟区统计年鉴2014[Z].北京:北京市门头沟区统计局,2014.
[23] 饶恩明,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.海南岛生态系统土壤保持功能空间特征及影响因素[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):746-755.
[24] 毕小刚,段淑怀,李永贵,等.北京山区土壤流失方程探讨[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(4):6-13.
[25] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.
[26] 师长兴.长江上游输沙尺度效应研究[J].地理研究,2008,27(4):800-810.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01