[1]LI Maosen,WANG Jijun,CHENG Simin,et al.Optimization of the Agricultural Industry-Resources System from Different Development Paths in Xiannangou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):275-281.
Copy
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
25
Number of periods:
2018 05
Page number:
275-281
Column:
Public date:
2018-09-06
- Title:
-
Optimization of the Agricultural Industry-Resources System from Different Development Paths in Xiannangou Watershed
- Author(s):
-
LI Maosen1, WANG Jijun1,2, CHENG Simin2,3, LI Yue1, QIAO Mei1
-
1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
-
- Keywords:
-
development paths; suitability evaluation; agricultural industry-resource system; Optimization; Xiannangou Watershed
- CLC:
-
F327
- DOI:
-
-
- Abstract:
-
The agricultural resources of Xiannangou watershed were not used efficiently, the system of agricultural industry practices grows inconsistently with agricultural resources. To deal with these problems, three patterns and seven scenarios of the possible development paths of the agricultural industry-resource system were made. On the basis of clean development mechanism (CDM), country’s ecological civilization in China and the ecological suitability evaluation, the system of Xiannangou watershed was optimized. The results indicated that the economic benefits of each phase increased at various degrees, especially in pattern Ⅱ and Ⅲ, in which carbon sink industry joined the system, the economic benefits of the watershed had been significantly improved, and the configuration of factors of production in the system had also changed significantly. With the improvement of urbanization and civil demand for happiness life, the agricultural industry-resource system will become the development tendency in terms of the features, low carbon, high efficiency and high yield. In comparison to the patternⅠ, it was just a theoretical result and can’t be used in reality because the reduction of the ecological forest area didn’t comply with relevant policies.