PDF Download

[1]ZHAO Naqian,SHI Xueyi,QU Lulu.Dynamic Analysis of Land Use Efficiency of Ecological-Living-Productive Land in Jincheng City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):257-261.

Copy

Dynamic Analysis of Land Use Efficiency of Ecological-Living-Productive Land in Jincheng City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 05 Page number: 257-261 Column: Public date: 2018-09-06

Title:: Dynamic Analysis of Land Use Efficiency of Ecological-Living-Productive Land in Jincheng City

Author(s):: ZHAO Naqian¹, SHI Xueyi¹, QU Lulu²; 1. Shool of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. Faculty of Geograpgical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Keywords:: land use efficiency; dynamic analysis; the method of TOPSIS; ecological-living-industrial land; coordination development; Jincheng City

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: We evaluated the land use efficiency of ecological-living-productive land from 2006 to 2013 in Jincheng, and established the indictor system containing three levels indictors. The indictor system was based on the theory of land multiple functions. The method of TOPSIS and coordination model were used to evaluate dynamic change process of the land use efficiency and coordination development, respectively. The results showed that both the comprehensive efficiency of ecological-living-industrial land and the efficiency about land use subsystems improved throughout the study period; the efficiency about subsystems was fluctuating without the efficiency of ecological-productive land that increased continuously; the chart about coordination development of ecological-living-productive land subsystems was in the shape of ‘double U’; and the subsystems coordinated highly with the degree of coordination in each year was great than 0.95. Agricultural innovative technology should be promoted to enhance the ability of resisting natural disasters for cultivated land, people was advocated to change their lifestyles, and utilization of the desulfurization technology in the industrial production process can improve the ecological environment.

References:: [1] 彭建,蒋依依,李正国,等.快速城市化地区土地利用效益评价:以南京市江宁区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005,14(3):304-309.
[2] 陈弢.区域旅游发展协调度的时空差异研究[J].地理研究,2014,33(3):558-568.
[3] 俞可平.科学发展观与生态文明[J].马克思主义与现实,2005(4):4-5.
[4] 沈清基.论基于生态文明的新型城镇化[J].城市规划学刊,2013,31(1):29-36.
[5] 洪惠坤."三生"功能协调下的重庆市乡村空间优化研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2016.
[6] 岳健,张雪梅.关于我国土地利用分类问题的讨论[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(1):78-88.
[7] 周宝同.土地资源可持续利用基本理论探讨[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,29(2):310-314.
[8] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005(5):536-540.
[9] 张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国"三生用地"分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[10] 宋成舜,崔薛华,柯新利,等.城市土地集约利用综合效益演化研究:以湖北省咸宁市为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):230-234.
[11] 申海元,陈瑛,张彩云.西安市土地利用综合效益研究[J].土壤通报,2009,40(2):209-212.
[12] 周飞,陈士银,吴明发,等.湛江市土地利用综合效益及其演化评价[J].地域研究与开发,2007,26(4):89-92.
[13] 宋戈,梁海鸥,林佳,等.黑龙江省垦区耕地利用综合效益评价及驱动力分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(5):835-840.
[14] 梁红梅,刘卫东,刘会平,等.深圳市土地利用社会经济效益与生态环境效益的耦合关系研究[J].地理科学,2008,28(5):636-641.
[15] 梁红梅,刘卫东,刘会平,等.土地利用社会经济效益与生态环境效益的耦合关系:以深圳市和宁波市为例[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(2):42-48.
[16] 张光宏,马艳.城郊土地利用社会经济效益和生态环境效益的动态耦合关系:以武汉市远城区为例[J].农业技术经济,2014(11):14-20.
[17] 刘耀彬,宋学锋.城市化与生态环境的耦合度及其预测模型研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(1):91-96.
[18] 朱珠,张琳,叶晓雯,等.基于TOPSIS方法的土地利用综合效益评价[J].经济地理,2012,32(10):139-144.
[10] 任力锋,王一任,张彦琼,等. TOPSIS法的改进与比较研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(1):64-66.
[20] 夏勇其,吴祈宗.一种混合型多属性决策问题的TOPSIS方法[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(6):630-634.
[21] 刘畅,师学义,梁旭琴,等.基于物元模型的资源型城市土地利用效益动态评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):122-126,131.
[22] 陶江,吴世新,董雯.天山北坡经济带土地利用效益评价[J].干旱区地理,2009,32(6):985-990.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01