PDF Download

[1]XIAO Jie,XIONG Kangning,GU Zaike,et al.Comparative Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Rocky Desertification Areas—A Case Study of Small Watersheds of Chaoying and Dingtan in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):293-299.

Copy

Comparative Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Rocky Desertification Areas—A Case Study of Small Watersheds of Chaoying and Dingtan in Guizhou Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 02 Page number: 293-299 Column: Public date: 2018-04-03

Title:: Comparative Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Rocky Desertification Areas—A Case Study of Small Watersheds of Chaoying and Dingtan in Guizhou Province

Author(s):: XIAO Jie¹, XIONG Kangning¹, GU Zaike², WANG Qi¹, LI Kaiping¹; 1. Institute of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University/State Engineering Technology Center for Karst Rock Desertification Rehabilitation, Guiyang 550001, China;
2. Guizhou Monitoring Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Guiyang 550001, China

Keywords:: rocky desertification; soil nutrient evaluation; minimum data set; small watershed

CLC:: S158.3;P931.5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to reveal the soil nutrient status and its overall level in rocky desertification areas with different landforms and grades, through the analysis of soil nutrient index and application of mathematical statistics, the minimum data set was established, and the soil nutrients were evaluated and compared in different geomorphic study areas and different degrees of rocky desertification. The results showed that:(1) the selected indexes of minimum data set were soil pH value, total nitrogen, organic matter and available potassium, which were the indexes to influence soil nutrient evaluation and required nutrients vegetation; (2) affected by different rocky desertification control models, soil nutrient accumulation effect was obvious, the evaluation score of Chaoying small watershed in different rocky desertification area was in the sequence:potential 0.729 > mild 0.658 > moderate 0.580 > strong 0.525, while the Dingtan small watershed was in the order:mild 0.541 > potential 0.515 > moderate 0.501 > strong 0.341; (3) through evaluation comparison, the soil nutrient comprehensive grade of Chaoying small watershed (0.673) was larger than soil nutrient comprehensive grade (0.478) of Dingtan; both were affected by different landforms, soil layer thickness, regolith continuities and rocky desertification governance model obviously. With the optimization and adjustment of rocky desertification governance model, the soil nutrient accumulation in Chaoying and Dingtan small watershed still has the potential to rise.

References:: [1] 龙健,邓启琼,江新荣,等.贵州喀斯特石漠化地区土地利用方式对土壤质量恢复能力的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(12):3188-3195.
[2] 熊康宁,黎平,周忠发,等.喀斯特石漠化的遥感-GIS典型研究:以贵州省为例[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.
[3] 国家林业局防治荒漠化管理中心,国家林业局中南林业调查规划设计院.石漠化综合治理模式[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2012.
[4] 熊康宁,陈永毕,陈起伟,等.点石成金:贵州石漠化防治技术与模式[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2011.
[5] 曹建华,袁道先,童立强.中国西南岩溶生态系统特征与石漠化综合治理对策[J].草业科学,2008(9):40-50.
[6] 庞世龙,欧芷阳,申文辉,等.广西喀斯特地区不同植被恢复模式土壤质量综合评价[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(7):60-66.
[7] 钟杰,蒋新革,吴立潮,等.石漠化演替过程中土壤肥力质量综合评价[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(7):56-61.
[8] 孙泉忠.贵州省石漠化综合治理人工种草土壤肥力综合评价[J].贵州农业科学,2015,43(9):94-97.
[9] 王建锋.重庆石漠化丘陵区耕层土壤养分空间变异性研究及肥力综合评价[D].重庆:西南大学,2010.
[10] 舒英格,何腾兵,高雪,等.喀斯特山区县域耕地土壤养分综合评价[J].贵州农业科学,2009(8):112-115.
[11] 熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.
[12] 熊平生,袁道先,谢世友.我国南方岩溶山区石漠化基本问题研究进展[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):355-362.
[13] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[14] Doran J W, Parkin T B. Defining and assessing soil quality[M]. Madison, Wisconsin, USA:Soil Science Society of American, Inc, 1994.
[15] 李婕羚,李朝婵,胡继伟,等.典型喀斯特山区无籽刺梨基地土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):54-59.
[16] 王建国,杨林章,单艳红.模糊数学在土壤质量评价中的应用研究[J].土壤学报,2001,38(2):176-183.
[17] 周玮,周运超.花江峡谷喀斯特区土壤质量两种定量评价方法研究[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(3):313-318.
[18] 司彬,姚小华,任华东,等.黔中喀斯特植被恢复演替过程中土壤理化性质研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2008,30(6):1122-1125.
[19] 杨吉华,张永涛,高祥伟,等.封山育林提高森林蓄水保土效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(3):2-5,54.
[20] 张伟,陈洪松,王克林,等.种植方式和裸岩率对喀斯特洼地土壤养分空间分异特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(7):1459-1463.
[21] 周涛,戴全厚,吴秀芹,等.喀斯特山区退耕还林地土壤养分效应及评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):71-74.
[22] 王济,蔡雄飞,雷丽,等.不同裸岩率下我国西南喀斯特山区土壤侵蚀的室内模拟[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(1):1-5.
[23] 盛茂银,刘洋,熊康宁.中国南方喀斯特石漠化演替过程中土壤理化性质的响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(19):6303-6313.
[24] 杨苏茂,熊康宁,喻阳华,等.我国喀斯特石漠化地区林草植被恢复模式的诊断与调整[J].世界林业研究,2017,30(3):91-96.
[25] 廖洪凯,龙健,李娟,等.花椒(Zanthoxylum bungeamun)种植对喀斯特山区土壤水稳性团聚体分布及有机碳周转的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015(1):106-113.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01