PDF Download

[1]LI Xiaoqing,JIANG Bo,MI Yuan,et al.Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Coupling Coordination Between Intensive Land Utilization and New Urbanization in Urban Agglomerations in Middle and Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):291-298.

Copy

Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Coupling Coordination Between Intensive Land Utilization and New Urbanization in Urban Agglomerations in Middle and Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 05 Page number: 291-298 Column: Public date: 2017-10-28

Title:: Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Coupling Coordination Between Intensive Land Utilization and New Urbanization in Urban Agglomerations in Middle and Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River

Author(s):: LI Xiaoqing, JIANG Bo, MI Yuan, SUN Yan, HAN Yi; College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Keywords:: intensive land utilization; new urbanization; coordinated development degree; urban agglomeration in middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River

CLC:: F293.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The coordinated development level between intensive land use and new urbanization of agglomeration is the core issue in land management. The coordinated development level of middle Yangtze River Region and Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration, which are the urban agglomerations in middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River, was analyzed to provide some relevant references. Generalization Principal Component Analysis and Mean-Squared Deviation Weight were used to improve the accuracy of the index weight. We used coupling degree model and coordinated development degree model to measure, analyze, compare the coordinated development level of the middle Yangtze River region and Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration. Spatial Autocorrelation Model was used to explore the characteristics and rules of spatial agglomeration of coordinated development level. The results show that the coordinated development level in Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration is close with the middle Yangtze River Region. The coupling coordinated situation in Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration is better than the middle Yangtze River Region. (1) The coordinated development level of the urban agglomerations in middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River is showing the trend of sustained growth. The coordination degree between the middle Yangtze River Region and Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration is very close in 2013, its value is greater than 0.75 and the coordination development level is in moderate coordination period. Chengdu, Chongqing, Changsha, Wuhan, Nanchang are the areas with high value of coordinated development. Deyang and Huangshi are areas with the low value of coordinated development. The coordinated development levels in other cities are characterized as the medium level. (2) The spatial correlation of coordinated development degree is reduced in the middle Yangtze River Region, transforming from random distribution to weak diversity attribute clustering. The spatial correlation of coordinated development degree is relatively high in Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration, transforming from diversity attribute clustering to random distribution, it will gradually become similar attribute clustering in the future.

References:: [1] 孙平军,吕飞,修春亮,等.新型城镇化下中国城市土地节约集约利用的基本认知与评价[J].经济地理,2015,35(8):178-183.
[2] 李平光,李松,郭路明,等.新疆地区城市土地集约利用与城市化耦合协调性分析[J].浙江农业学报,2014,26(6):1688-1695.
[3] 张超,李丁,魏秀梅,等.西北河谷型城市新型城镇化与土地利用效益耦合协调发展研究:以兰州市为例[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2015,51(2):173-179.
[4] 彭冲,陈乐一,韩峰.新型城镇化与土地集约利用的时空演变及关系[J].地理研究,2014,33(11):2005-2020.
[5] Christoph K, Claudia B, Ulrich C. Effects of urban land use on surface temperature in Berlin:Case study, Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 2007,133(2):128-137.
[6] Susannah G E, Handley J F, Ennos A R, et al. Characterizing the urban environment of UK cities and towns:A template for landscape and urban planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008,87(3):210-222.
[7] 曹飞.中国新型城镇化质量与城镇土地集约测度及其协调分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):349-353.
[8] 张乐勤,陈素平,陈保平,等.城镇化与土地集约利用耦合协调度测度:以安徽省为例[J].城市问题,2014(2):75-82.
[9] 刘浩,张毅,郑文升.城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价:以环渤海地区城市为例[J].地理研究,2011,30(10):1805-1817.
[10] 刘学,孙泰森.山西省城市土地集约利用与城市化的耦合协调关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(2):299-304.
[11] 张惠.我国城镇化与城市土地集约利用耦合发展探析[J].华南师范大学学报,2015,47(3):127-133.
[12] Macedo J. Urban land policy and new land tenure paradigms: Legitimacy vs. legality in Brazilian cities[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,25(2):259-270.
[13] 周青,黄贤金,濮励杰,等.快速城镇化农村区域土地利用变化及驱动机制研究:以江苏省原锡山市为例[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):22-30.
[14] 刘萌,冯长春,曹广忠.中国城市土地投入产出效率与城镇化水平的耦合关系:对286个地级及以上城市行政单元的分析[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(5):50-57.
[15] 丁志伟,张改素,王发曾,等.中国工业化、城镇化、农业现代化、信息化、绿色化“五化”协调定量评价的进展与反思[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(1):4-13.
[16] 丁志伟,张改素,王发曾.中原地区多尺度城乡收入的时空分异[J].地理研究,2015,34(1):131-148.
[17] 范辉,刘卫东,吴泽斌,等.浙江省人口城市化与土地城市化的耦合协调关系评价[J].经济地理,2014,34(12):21-28.
[18] 王聪,朱喜钢,王富喜.基于均方差权值法的山东省县域城镇化水平评价[J].山东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,24(4):78-83.
[19] 席娟,张毅,杨小强.陕西省城市土地利用效益与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013,47(1):117-123.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01