[1]ZHAO Xueqiao,YUAN Xiaohuan.Soil and Water Conservation of Twelve Under-forest Cover Plants[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):66-69.
Copy
Soil and Water Conservation of Twelve Under-forest Cover Plants
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
24
Number of periods:
2017 04
Page number:
66-69
Column:
Public date:
2017-08-28
- Title:
- Soil and Water Conservation of Twelve Under-forest Cover Plants
- Keywords:
- soil; anti-erodibility; permeability; cover plants; under-forest
- CLC:
- S157.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- To study the soil and water conservation function of cover plants on the forest floor, the water absorption of stem and leaves, the soil anti-erodibility and the soil permeability were measured with 12 cover plants using the indoor leaf immersion method, the hydrostatic collapse method, and the bicyclic knife method, respectively. The results showed that Calamagrostis brachytricha and Phalaris arundinacea var.picta had the highest water absorption over 40% of the stem and leaves weight; Phalaris arundinacea var.Picta, Carex lanceolata and Carex leucochlora best increased the soil anti-erodibility; the cover plants decreased the soil bulk density and generally increased the soil permeability, and the permeability of soils planted with Phalaris arundinacea var.picta, Pennisetum alopecuroides, C.brachytricha, C.leucochlora, C.lanceolata and Cosmos sulphureus extremely significantly differed from the control. Therefore, C.leucochlora, C.Lanceolata, P. arundinacea var.picta and C.brachytricha have the higher integrated soil and water conservation function and fit to be planted under the forest.
- References:
-
[1] Lumaret R, Guillerm J L, Maillet J, et al. Plant species diversity and polyploidy in islands of natural vegetation isolated in extensive cultivated lands[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1997,6(4):591-613.
[2] Clary Jr R F, Slayback R D. Plant materials and establishment techniques for revegetation of California desert highways[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1983,969(1):24-26.
[3] 李辉,赵卫智.北京5种草坪地被植物生态效益的研究[J].中国园林,1998,14(4):36-38.
[4] 龙忠富,唐成斌,钱晓刚,等.几种草被植物保持水土效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(4):136-138.
[5] 赵洋毅,周运超,段旭.黔中石灰岩喀斯特表层土壤结构性与土壤抗蚀抗冲性[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):18-21.
[6] 王玉杰,王云琦,夏一平.重庆缙云山典型林分的林地土壤抗蚀抗冲性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(1):20-26.
[7] 符气浩,杨小波,吴庆书.城市绿化的生态效益[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.
[8] 孙铁军,刘素军,武菊英,等.6种禾草坡地水土保持效果的比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3):158-162.
[9] 王震洪,段昌群,侯永平,等.植物多样性与生态系统土壤保持功能关系及其生态学意义[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(3):392-403.
[10] 焦菊英,王万中,李靖.黄土高原林草水土保持有效盖度分析[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(5):608-612.
[11] 马金平.植被保持水土效益研究综述[J].山西水土保持科技,2005(1):13-15.
[12] 赵明坤,陈瑞祥.苇状羊茅和鸭茅的水土保持效果[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(4):92-94.
[13] 字淑慧,吴伯志,段青松,等.非洲狗尾草防治坡耕地水土流失效应的研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):183-185.
[14] 郑子成,杨玉梅,李廷轩.不同退耕模式下土壤抗蚀性差异及其评价模型[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(10):199-205.
[15] 吕文星,张洪江,程金花,等.三峡库区植物篱对土壤理化性质及抗蚀性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):69-73.
[16] 王忠林,李会科.渭北旱塬花椒地埂林土壤抗蚀抗冲性研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(1):33-37.
[17] 孙传生,李春华.提高土壤抗蚀性减少水土流失[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(5):5-6.
[18] 龙忠富,汪俊良,刘正书,等.百喜草不同种植模式的水土保持效应初探[J].山地农业生物学报,2004,23(5):408-411.
[19] 马琦,王琦.几种草被植物的水土保持效应研究[J].草业科学,2005,22(10):72-74.
[20] 王凭青,段传人,王伯初,等.杂交狼尾草水土保持能力的实验研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):114-116.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01