PDF Download

[1]LI Yimin,ZHU Jun,YU Yanhong.An Assessment on Basin Ecological Security and Its Variation Characteristics in Factors Based on GIS Technique and Geometric Mean Model —A Case in Nebula Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):198-205.

Copy

An Assessment on Basin Ecological Security and Its Variation Characteristics in Factors Based on GIS Technique and Geometric Mean Model —A Case in Nebula Lake Basin

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 03 Page number: 198-205 Column: Public date: 2017-06-28

Title:: An Assessment on Basin Ecological Security and Its Variation Characteristics in Factors Based on GIS Technique and Geometric Mean Model —A Case in Nebula Lake Basin

Author(s):: LI Yimin^1,2, ZHU Jun^1,2, YU Yanhong²; 1. Department of Environment and Resources, Yunnan Institute of Geography, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Pollution Process and Management of Lake Basin in Yunnan Province, Kunming 650091, China

Keywords:: geometric mean model; GIS technique; ecological security pattern; spatial differentiation; Xingyun Lake Basin

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The 10 factors includes elevation, slope, soil erosion intensity, prone to geological disasters, land use types, vegetation coverage, distance from the natural ecological protection zone, the distance of construction land, population density and the distance from the water were selected to evaluate the ecological security of Nebula Lake Basin. The spatial distribution and formation mechanism of regional ecological security was analyzed by using the geometric mean model and 3S technology tentatively. The study showed that the average ecological security index was 2.33 in Nebula Lake basin. From the aspect of area proportion of all security levels, the area of moderate security zone accounted for 42.34%, high security for 22.84%, the low security for 26.43%, the unsafe for 8.39% of the total basin area, which illustrated that ecological security was mainly moderate security in the basin; from spatial distribution aspect, the zone of higher ecological security mainly distributed in the northern, eastern and southern and built-up zones in Nebula Lake basin where the slope gradients of land are great, terrain was undulated, the forest landscape was fragemental, land use was not reasonable, soil erosion was severe, and geological disasters has happened except that the city building intensive area was disturbed by the human, these regiions are the key areas of ecological protection and construction; there is a big difference between the two results that the regional ecological security is affected by multiple factors, single factor evaluation is difficult to accurately reflect the characteristics and mechanism of spatial differentiation of the regional ecological security through the comparison and analysis between the results of comprehensive evaluation and single factor evaluation. There is the relationship of mutual promotion and inhibition among each factor. The factors such as slope, water resource environment, soil and water loss and disturbance factors of human activities such as land use pattern, distance from construction land are the main factors to form the ecological security pattern of the basin.

References:: [1] 劳燕玲.滨海湿地生态安全评价研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2013.
[2] 陈星,周成虎.生态安全:国内外研究综述[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(6):8-20.
[3] 潘竟虎,石培基,刘英英.干旱区县域土地利用规划环境影响的生态安全评价:以张掖市甘州区为例[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):248-2523.
[4] 李晖,易娜,姚文璟,等.基于景观安全格局的香格里拉县生态用地规划[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):5928-5936.
[5] 吴金华,李纪伟,朱鸿儒.基于ArcGIS区统计的延安市土地生态敏感性评价[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1180-1188.
[6] 凡非得,王克林,熊鹰,等.西南喀斯特区域水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(21):6353-6362.
[7] 黄静,崔胜辉,李方一,等.厦门市土地利用变化下的生态敏感性[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7441-7449.
[8] 杨月圆,王金亮,杨丙丰.云南省土地生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2253-2260.
[9] 周锐,王新军,苏海龙,等.基于生态安全格局的城市增长边界划定:以平顶山新区为例[J].城市规划学刊,2014(4):57-63.
[10] 杨子生.云南省金沙江流域土壤流失方程研究[J].山地学报,2002,20(S1):1-9.
[11] Liu B Y, Nearing M A, Risse L M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1994,37(6):1835-1840.
[12] 怡凯,王诗阳,王雪,等.基于RUSLE模型的土壤侵蚀时空分异特征分析:以辽宁省朝阳市为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(3):365-372.
[13] 查良松,邓国徽,谷家川.1992-2013年巢湖流域土壤侵蚀动态变化[J].地理学报,2015,70(11):1708-1719.
[14] 杨冉冉,徐涵秋,林娜,等.基于RUSLE的福建省长汀县河田盆地区土壤侵蚀定量研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(10):2974-2982.
[15] 颜磊.遗产景区旅游市场时空格局研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2006.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01