PDF Download

[1]GUO Rongzhong,SHEN Haijian.Studies on Ecological Compensation Based on Ecological Footprint in Lishui River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):353-358.

Copy

Studies on Ecological Compensation Based on Ecological Footprint in Lishui River Basin

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 02 Page number: 353-358 Column: Public date: 2017-04-28

Title:: Studies on Ecological Compensation Based on Ecological Footprint in Lishui River Basin

Author(s):: GUO Rongzhong¹, SHEN Haijian²; 1. Changsha Environmental Protection Occupation Technical College, Changsha 410004, China;
2. Institute of Mapping of Hu’nan Province, Changsha 410004, China

Keywords:: ecological footprint; regional ecological compensation; Lishui River Basin

CLC:: F301

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Lishui River Basin was selected as the research site. The ecological compensation amount of the study area was calculated by combining with the regional social and economic development level, and using the calculation method of the ecological footprint. The results show that:(1) with respect to the change rate of the ecosystem service value in Lishui River Basin counties (cities, districts) from 2001 to 2013, the largest decrease was observed in Lixian, followed by Linli County, while the largest increase occurred in Wulingyuan District, followed by Sangzhi County; (2) the ecological footprint per capita in Lishui River Basin in 2013 was 3.203 6 hm², but the actual ecological carrying capacity was 0.600 0 hm², the ecological carrying capacity per capita was 0.528 0 hm², and the ecological deficit per capita was -2.675 6 hm²; (3) the ecological compensation standard of the counties (cities, districts) in Lishui River Basin was calculated, of which the amount of ecological compensation of Lixian was required to pay the highest value of 2.697×10⁹ yuan, followed by the Shimen County, and Linli County with 8.87×10⁸ and 6.44×10⁸ yuan, respectively. The research results would provide supports to establish the ecological compensation mechanism in the Lishui River Basin.

References:: [1] 李利军.成本倒逼,利益引导:合理运用排污权制度消解经济与环境矛盾[J].石家庄铁道大学学报:社会科学版,2013,7(3):1-6.
[2] Tietenberg, Tom:Environment and Natural Resource Economics[M]. Sixth Edition. Beijing:Tsinghua Press, 2005.
[3] 王女杰,刘建,吴大千,等.基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿:以山东省为例[J].生态学报,2010,30(23):6646-6653.
[4] 张落成,李青,武清华.天目湖流域生态补偿标准核算探讨[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(3):412-418.
[5] 杨光梅.基于生态系统服务的生态补偿理论与实证研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2007.
[6] Rees W, Wackernagel M. Urban ecological footprints:why cities cannot be sustainable-and why they are a key to sustainability[J]. Environmental impact assessment review, 1996, 16(4):223-248.
[7] Wakernagel M, Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[C]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers, 1996.
[8] Rees W E. Revisiting carrying capacity:area-based indicators of sustainability[J]. Population and Environment, 1996,17(3):195-215.
[9] 郑晖,石培基,何娟娟.甘肃省生态足迹与生态承载力动态分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(10):13-18.
[10] 张佳琦,段玉山,伍燕南.基于生态足迹的苏州市可持续发展动态研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(2):177-183.
[11] 安宝晟,程国栋.西藏生态足迹与承载力动态分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(4):1002-1009.
[12] 李晓光,苗鸿,郑华,等.生态补偿标准确定的主要方法及其应用[J].生态学报,2009,29(8):4431-4440.
[13] 庄添淇.基于生态足迹和服务价值的生态补偿研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2012.
[14] 张皓玮,方斌,魏巧巧,等.区域耕地生态价值补偿量化模型构建:以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(1):63-70.
[15] 肖建红,王敏,于庆东,等.海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准方法体系的构建与应用[J].生态学报,2016,36(2):1-16.
[16] 苏浩,雷国平,李荣印.基于生态系统服务价值和能值生态足迹的河南省耕地生态补偿研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2014,48(6):765-769.
[17] 湖南统计年鉴[Z].北京:中国统计出版社,2002-2014.
[18] Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,386(6630):253-260.
[19] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[20] 谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.
[21] 刘某承,李文华.基于净初级生产力的中国各地生态足迹均衡因子测算[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(5):401-406.
[22] 刘某承,李文华,谢高地.基于净初级生产力的中国生态足迹产量因子测算[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(3):592-597.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01