PDF Download

[1]MA Shaowei,GUO Jianying,LAN Dengming,et al.Study on Community Restoration Characteristics of Different Conversions of Croplands to Forestlands in Wuqi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):204-209.

Copy

Study on Community Restoration Characteristics of Different Conversions of Croplands to Forestlands in Wuqi County

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 06 Page number: 204-209 Column: Public date: 2016-12-28

Title:: Study on Community Restoration Characteristics of Different Conversions of Croplands to Forestlands in Wuqi County

Author(s):: MA Shaowei¹, GUO Jianying², LAN Dengming¹, LI Jinrong², SHAN Dan², ZHAO Xinghua¹; 1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China;
2. Institute of Water Resources for Pastoral Area, Ministry of Water Resources, Hohhot 010020, China

Keywords:: conversion of cropland to forestland; plant diversity; biomass; community succession

CLC:: S718.54⁺2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: A systematic study was carried out in different types of lands with conversions of croplands to forestlands from species diversity, biomass and litter in Wuqi County of Shaanxi Province, aiming at discussing the restoration situation and effect of different types of lands. The results show that conversion of cropland to forest project promotes positive vegetation succession for 10 years. Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. sinensis×Armeniaca sibirica mixed forests is relatively suitable forest in Wuqi County, forming the combining system of forest and grass effectively. Community biomass of different restored lands has significant difference. And herbaceous biomass of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. sinensis×Armeniaca sibirica mixed forests is the greatest. Except that Pinus tabulaeformis and Armeniaca sibirica pure forest have smaller litter biomass, litter biomass of other woodland is greater than the natural grassland. The conclusion will provide a theoretical basis for the reasonable selection and allocation of tree species in the project of returning cropland to forestland in the future.

References:: [1] 于国强,李占斌,裴亮,等.不同植被类型下坡面径流侵蚀产沙差异性[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):1-6.
[2] 王晓慧,陈永富,陈尔学.基于遥感和GIS的黄土高原中阳县土壤侵蚀评价[J].山地学报,2011,29(4):442-448.
[3] 王冬,杨政,郝红敏,等.黄土区退耕草地凋落物-土壤界面水分过程特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):80-84.
[4] 张翼.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(2):39-47.
[5] 李登科.陕北吴起县退耕还林(草)成效的遥感监测分析[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):125-130.
[6] 郭建英,李锦荣,刘铁军,等.退耕还林工程建设对吴起县土地利用/覆被变化及其土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):1-6.
[7] 赵健,魏天兴,陈致富,等.陕西吴起县退耕还林地不同植被水土保持效益分析[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(3):31-34,49.
[8] 杨光,孙保平,赵廷宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕还林工程植被恢复效益初步研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):165-170.
[9] 秦伟,朱清科,赖亚飞.退耕还林工程生态价值评估与补偿:以陕西省吴起县为例[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(5):159-164.
[10] 王丹丹,吴普特,赵西宁.黄土高原退耕还林(草)效益评价研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2010,25(3):223-228.
[11] 冯宗炜,王效科,吴刚.中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[12] 姜恕,等.草地生态研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1988,15-21.
[13] 马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法I.α多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239.
[14] 白永飞,许志信,李德新.内蒙古高原针茅草原群落α多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2000,8(4):353-360.
[15] 汪殿蓓,暨淑仪,陈飞鹏,等.深圳南山区天然森林群落多样性及演替现状[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1415-1422.
[16] 曹成有,朱德华,耿莉,等.小叶锦鸡儿放牧场沙漠化过程中植物多样性的变化[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):166-169.
[17] 王君厚,周士威,任培政.乌兰布和沙漠东北边缘植物群落物种多样性及其生态环境[J].中国沙漠,1996,(3):259-266.
[18] 于立忠,于水强,史建伟.不同类型人工阔叶红松林高,等植物物种多样性[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(11):1253-1255.
[19] 杨元武,李希来,祁盛仓.江河源地区不同荒漠化草地物种多样性研究[J].青海大学学报,2005,23(3):42-45.
[20] 牟长城,张娜,倪志英.不同恢复途径对大兴安岭森林沼泽群落植物多样性影响[J].中国林副特产,2007,88(3):1-6.
[21] 韩恩贤,韩刚.黄土高原沟壑区沙棘人工混交林改土效应研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(6):879-884.
[22] 张占山,白岗栓,侯喜录,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区油松与沙棘混交油松成林过程研究[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(2):40-44.
[23] 王世忠,李树民.半干旱地区油松纯林改造成混交林效益分析[J].林业科技通讯,1999,(6):21-24.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01