PDF Download

[1]WANG Guoyou.An Empirical Study on Dispersed Choice in WTP for GHG Reduction Based on the Resident’s Specific Properties[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):291-297.

Copy

An Empirical Study on Dispersed Choice in WTP for GHG Reduction Based on the Resident’s Specific Properties

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 05 Page number: 291-297 Column: Public date: 2016-10-28

Title:: An Empirical Study on Dispersed Choice in WTP for GHG Reduction Based on the Resident’s Specific Properties

Author(s):: WANG Guoyou^1,2; 1. Economic and Management Center, Chongqing Technology & Business university, Chongqing 400067, China;
2. School of Environment, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Keywords:: GHG reduction; WTP; logistic discrete choice model; affecting factor

CLC:: F062.2;X51

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Choice of WTP for GHG reduction has always been one of the basis of the study of building China’s GHG emissions framework, different parts of the reasonable responsibility to reduce emissions and low carbon economy development policies. The whole process of choice is commonly influenced by systematic component (payment attribute) and random component (resident property). Based on WTP survey in the Chengdu City， Chongqing City and Urumqi City, Logistic discrete choice model was used to analyze affecting factors on resident’s WTP. The results show that the Urumqi City residents have the highest willingness to pay followed by Chengdu City and Chongqing City. It was found that region, age, education, income, occupation, children and pay motivation significantly influenced the willingness to pay. Compared with the most perfect data research, intent-to-treat research can better analyze the residents’ perception and attitude of greenhouse gas emissions.

References:: [1] Burghart D R, Cameron T A, Gerdes G R. Valuing publicly sponsored research projects:risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2007,35(1):77-105.
[2] Viscusi W K, Zeckhauser R J. The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change:a rational and behavioral blend[J]. Climatic Change,2006,77(1/2):151-177.
[3] Lee J J, Cameron T A. Popular support for climate change mitigation:evidence from a general population mail survey[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008,41(2):223-248.
[4] 郑思齐,符育明,任荣荣.居民对城市生活质量的偏好:从住房成本变动和收敛角度的研究[J].世界经济文汇,2011(2):35-49.
[5] 曾贤刚.我国城镇居民对CO₂减排的支付意愿调查研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(2):346-352.
[6] 国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所课题组.中国2050年低碳发展之路:能源需求暨碳排放情景分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[7] 齐晔.中国低碳发展报告(2013)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.
[8] Andersen M S, Ekins P. Carbon-Energy Taxation:Lessons from Europe[M]. London:OUP Oxford,2009.
[9] Train K E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
[10] 聂冲,贾生华.离散选择模型的基本原理及其发展演进评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,12(11):151-159.
[11] Andrews R L, Ainslie A, Currim I S. An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2002,39(4):479-487.
[12] 中国气候传播项目中心.中国公众气候变化与气候传播认知状况调研报告[R].北京:中国气候传播项目中心,2012.
[13] Leiserowitz A A. American risk perceptions:Is climate change dangerous[J]. Risk Analysis,2005,25(6):1433-1442.
[14] 赵现红.基于游客特性的旅游目的地离散选择实证研究:以三大口岸中转型入境游客为例[J].旅游学刊,2009,24(12):60-62.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01