PDF Download

[1]LI Haiyan,CAI Yinying.Agricultural Land Ecological Compensation Standard Estimate Based on Farmers’ Willingness to Accept—A Case Study of Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):245-250,256.

Copy

Agricultural Land Ecological Compensation Standard Estimate Based on Farmers’ Willingness to Accept—A Case Study of Hubei Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 04 Page number: 245-250,256 Column: Public date: 2016-04-28

Title:: Agricultural Land Ecological Compensation Standard Estimate Based on Farmers’ Willingness to Accept—A Case Study of Hubei Province

Author(s):: LI Haiyan, CAI Yinying; College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Keywords:: agricultural land ecological compensation; compensation policy standard; farmers’ willingness to accept; Pareto improvement; Tobit model

CLC:: F062.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on the principle of ‘protector to get compensation’, and aiming at retarding agricultural land ecological environment damage and transforming agricultural negative externalities, we built agricultural land ecological compensation policy with a hypothetical market conditions. Taking Hubei Province as an example, we establish governor’ willingness to pay and farmers’ willingness to accept functions under uncertain condition and analyzed the agricultural land ecological compensation standard with social welfare to achieve the maximum. Then, we get to take value interval of agricultural land ecological compensation standard which conforms to Pareto improvement. Through contingent valuation method and Tobit model, farmers’ average willingness to accept and influencing factors were analyzed. The results are shown as follows. (1) Agricultural land ecological compensation standard could exceed farmers’ average willingness to accept, for example, agricultural land ecological compensation standard in Hubei Province should be higher 5 541.15~6 778.20 yuan/(hm²·a). (2) Agricultural income proportion, famers’ expectation on an improvement in the ecological environment of farmland have a positive impact on farmers’ willingness to accept to protect farmland ecological environment; Age, family labor ratio, family farmland circulation ratio have a negative impact on it.

References:: [1] 蔡银莺,张安录.基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿额度测算[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(2):177-189.
[2] 臧玉珠,彭慧,周生路,等.苏南地区土地生态质量空间分异及其与经济发展协调性评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):187-197.
[3] Chamberlain J F, Miller S A. Policy incentives for switch grass production using valuation of non-market ecosystem services[J]. Energy Policy,2012,48(9):526-536.
[4] Beharry-Borg N, Smart J C R, Termansen M, et al. Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands[J]. Regional Environmental Change,2013,13(3):633-647.
[5] Christensen T, Pedersen A B, Nielsenb H O, et al. Determinants of farmers’willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones:A choice experiment study[J]. Ecological Economics,2011,70(8):1558-1564.
[6] Broch S W, Strange N, Jacobsen J B, et al. Farmers’ willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution[J]. Ecological Economics,2013,92(8):78-86.
[7] Mettepenningen E, Verspecht A, Van Huylenbroeck G. Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2009,52(5):649-667.
[8] Kaczan D, Swallow B M, Adamowicz W L. Designing a payments for ecosystem services(PES)program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania:An assessment of payment approaches[J]. Ecological Economics,2013,95(11):20-30.
[9] 蔡银莺,余亮亮.重点开发区域农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析:武汉市的例证[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1660-1669.
[10] 施翠仙,郭先华,祖艳群,等.基于CVM意愿调查的洱海流域上游农业生态补偿研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(4):730-736.
[11] 杨欣,蔡银莺.基于农户受偿意愿的武汉市农田生态补偿标准估算[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):212-216.
[12] 刘军弟,霍学喜,黄玉祥,等.基于农户受偿意愿的节水灌溉补贴标准研究[J].农业技术经济,2012(11):29-40.
[13] 姜宏瑶,温亚利.基于WTA的湿地周边农户受偿意愿及影响因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(4):489-494.
[14] 冯琳,徐建英,邸敬涵.三峡生态屏障区农户退耕受偿意愿的调查分析[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(5):938-944.
[15] 韩鹏,黄河清,甄霖,等.基于农户意愿的脆弱生态区生态补偿模式研究:以鄱阳湖区为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):625-642.
[16] 许恒周.基于农户受偿意愿的宅基地退出补偿及影响因素分析:以山东省临清市为例[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(10):75-81.
[17] 李国平,李潇,萧代基.生态补偿的理论标准与测算方法探讨[J].经济学家,2013(2):42-49.
[18] 姜亮亮,包安明,刘海隆,等.玛纳斯流域生态需水变化与景观格局的响应关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):144-149.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01