PDF Download

[1]SONG Lili,QIN Mingzhou,CHEN Yuqi,et al.Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors of Arable Land Use Intensity in He’nan Province Based on the County Level Panel Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):239-244.

Copy

Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors of Arable Land Use Intensity in He’nan Province Based on the County Level Panel Data

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 04 Page number: 239-244 Column: Public date: 2016-04-28

Title:: Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors of Arable Land Use Intensity in He’nan Province Based on the County Level Panel Data

Author(s):: SONG Lili^1,2, QIN Mingzhou¹, CHEN Yuqi³, ZHANG Pengyan¹; 1. College of Environment and Planning, He’nan University, Kaifeng, He’nan 475004, China;
2. College of Landscape Architecture, He’nan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, He’nan 453003, China;
3. China Land Surveying and Planning Institute Key Laboratory of Land Use Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100035, China

Keywords:: arable land use intensity; panel data; He’nan Province; econometric model

CLC:: F301.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on the county level panel data, we analyzed the change and regional disparities of the arable land use intensity and input factors intensity in He’nan Province from 1994 to 2008. Then we constructed econometric model to analyze the influencing factors on arable land use intensity of He’nan Province. The results showed that:(1) from 1994 to 2008, arable land use intensity, chemical fertilizer intensity, plastic film intensity, pesticide intensity, agricultural machinery power intensity, agricultural diesel oil intensity were all in growing trend, on the contrary, labor intensity began to decline after reaching the highest point in 2000; (2) regional difference of arable land use intensity showed a waving trend, and labor intensity took on obvious periodic; (3) economic development level and agricultural policy had a significant positive influence on arable land use intensity, per capita actual area and price indices of means of agricultural production were just the opposite. Therefore, He’nan Province should pay more attention to agricultural ecological environment problems caused by the increase of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and make poor areas fully realize the intensive and efficient utilization of the arable land use intensity by increasing agricultural support.

References:: [1] 姚成胜,黄琳,吕晞,等.基于能值理论的中国耕地利用集约度时空变化分析[J].农业工程学报,2014(8):1-12.
[2] 李秀彬,朱会义,谈明洪,等.土地利用集约度的测度方法[J].地理科学进展,2008(6):12-17.
[3] 张琳,张凤荣,安萍莉,等.不同经济发展水平下的耕地利用集约度及其变化规律比较研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(1):108-112.
[4] 姚冠荣,刘桂英,谢花林.中国耕地利用投入要素集约度的时空差异及其影响因素分析[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(11):1836-1848.
[5] 乔家君,吴娜琳,李德洗.河南省农田利用集约度时空变化及其影响环境[J].地理研究,2012(9):1598-1610.
[6] 谢花林,邹金浪,彭小琳.基于能值的鄱阳湖生态经济区耕地利用集约度时空差异分析[J].地理学报,2012(7):889-902.
[7] 曹银贵,周伟,王静,等.基于主成分分析与层次分析的三峡库区耕地集约利用对比[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(4):291-296.
[8] 杜涛,贾春香.耕地集约利用时空特征及其变化规律研究:以新疆为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012(9):114-118.
[9] 陈瑜琦,李秀彬.1980年以来中国耕地利用集约度的结构特征[J].地理学报,2009(4):469-478.
[10] 李兆亮,杨子生,邹金浪.我国耕地利用集约度空间差异及影响因素研究[J].农业现代化研究,2014(1):88-92.
[11] 陈瑜琦,李秀彬,朱会义,等.不同经济发展水平地区耕地利用变化对比研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2011(1):124-131.
[12] Odum H T. Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M]. New York, US:John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
[13] 蓝盛芳,钦佩元,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
[14] 陈阜.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2011.
[15] 赵俊锐,朱道林.基于能值分析的土地开发整理后效益评价[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(10):337-344.
[16] 赵京,杨钢桥.耕地利用集约度变化影响因素典型相关分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,(10):103-108.
[17] 吴郁玲,冯忠垒,周勇,等.耕地集约利用影响因素的协整分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,(11):67-72.
[18] 李晓赛,赵丽,杨胜利,等.保定市耕地集约利用时空变异分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):229-233,239.
[19] 王国刚,刘彦随,陈秧分.中国省域耕地集约利用态势与驱动力分析[J].地理学报,2014,69(7):907-915.
[20] 张晓峒.计量经济学基础[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2007.
[21] 朱传民,黄雅丹,吴佳,等.江西省县域耕地集约利用水平时空差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):160-164.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01