PDF Download

[1]MI Lindi,ZHOU Ying,WANG Qing.Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residence in Baoxing River Basin After Ya’an 4·20 Earthquake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):199-203.

Copy

Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residence in Baoxing River Basin After Ya’an 4·20 Earthquake

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 03 Page number: 199-203 Column: Public date: 2016-06-28

Title:: Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residence in Baoxing River Basin After Ya’an 4·20 Earthquake

Author(s):: MI Lindi, ZHOU Ying, WANG Qing; School of Environment and Resources, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China

Keywords:: Ya’an 4 · 20 earthquake; rural residence; GIS; suitability evaluation

CLC:: F301;X826

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The mountainous area of Wudu-Luding line with fragile environment has become the most serious geographical unit after strong earthquake of Wenchuan and Lushan. It is intractable to reconstruct the damaged habitat after earthquake and inevitable to maintain the social stability of disaster areas. In order to evaluate residence environmental suitability, we selected topography, weather, vegetation, geological disaster, and world natural heritage of giant panda habitat as key factors in the rural residence of Baoxing River Basin. The results are as follows. (1) The distribution of rural residence suitability is characterized by altitude, slope, and aspect, and especially concentrated in the world heritage area and its periphery. This distribution characterization indicates that the terrain is the main influence factor of habitat suitability. The suitability and sub-suitability habitats mainly distribute in the sunny slope and half sunny slope positions where the altitudes are less than 2 900 m and slope gradients are less than 30°; (2) The half shady slope and shady slope places with altitude of greater than 2 900 m and slope greater than 30° are the main distribution areas of sub-unsuitability and unsuitable habitat. This distribution characterization is related to limited factors of vegetation growth, such as high altitude, steep slope and shortage of heat; (3) The suitability of rural residence reduced gradually from the southeast to the northwest. The suitable region accounts for 16.79% of the study area, and sub-suitable region, sub-unsuitable region and unsuitable region account for 26.93%, 32.47% and 23.81%, respectively. According to the above main evaluation results of residence environmental suitability, this research could provide scientific support for the selection of safe site and habitat restoration of earthquake areas.

References:: [1] 王海茳,郭亚琳,王青.雅安地震灾区宝兴县聚落空间特征分析[J].宁夏大学学报:自然科学版,2015,36(2):191-196.
[2] 张建强,苏凤环,范建容."4·20"芦山地震崩塌滑坡与公路危险性评价:以宝兴县省道S210沿线为例[J].山地学报,2013(5):616-623.
[3] 方炫,刘德林,李壁成,等.黄土高原乡级尺度土地利用适宜性评价:以宁南山区河川乡为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):174-178.
[4] 王强,袁兴中,刘红,等.山地河流生境快速评价模型与应用[J].水利学报,2011,42(8):928-933.
[5] Store R, Jokim?ki J. A GIS-based multi-scale approach to habitat suitability modeling[J]. Ecological Modelling,2003,169(1):1-15.
[6] Store R, Kangas J. Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55(2):79-93.
[7] 苏雷,朱京海,傅立群,等.GIS支持下的锦州葫芦岛沿海土地生态适宜性评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(4):207-212.
[8] 张艳红,何春光.基于GIS扎龙自然保护区丹顶鹤适宜生境动态变化[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(4):43-45.
[9] 王筱明.基于生态适宜性的济南市山地丘陵区荒地资源开发研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(4):264-267.
[10] 王金亮,陈姚.3S技术在野生动物生境研究中的应用[J].地理与地理学,2004,20(6):44-47.
[11] 任平,兰亭超,周介铭,等.城乡建设用地增减挂钩区域适宜性评价与空间布局规划研究:以成都龙泉驿区为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):272-282.
[12] 蔡靖疆,辜寄蓉,王成善,等.岷江上游土地资源适宜性评价研究[J].矿物岩石,2001,21(1):91-97.
[13] 肖燚,欧阳志云,朱春全,等.岷山地区大熊猫生境评价与保护对策研究[J].生态学报,2004,24(7):1373-1379.
[14] 高彦净,谢余初,钱大文,等.甘肃白龙江流域植被覆盖度及景观格局变化[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):181-187.
[15] 汪丽娟,王青.宝兴综合生态系统管理功能分区与生态农业建设[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(1):296-298.
[16] 王介勇,刘彦随,张富刚.海南岛土地生态适宜性评价[J].山地学报,2007,25(3):290-294.
[17] 胡彩婷,李巧云,关欣,等.永兴县发展冰糖橙产业的土地适宜性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):228-236.
[18] 王世波,崔金鉴,王世良.基于层次分析法的风险投资项目评价[J].工业技术经济,2003,22(6):87-89.
[19] 王青,石敏球,郭亚琳,等.岷江上游山区聚落生态位垂直分异研究[J].地理学报,2013,68(11):1559-1567.
[1] 彭保发.区域LUCC的景观生态效应研究:以湖南省常德市为例[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2010.
[2] Turner B L I, Skole D L, Sanderson S, et al. Land-use and land-cover change:Science/Research plan[R]. Stockholm:IGBP, 1995.
[3] 史培军.人地系统动力学研究的现状与展望[J].地学前缘,1997(2):201-211.
[4] 李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域:土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996(6):553-558.
[5] 关伟,王雪.大连市土地利用变化的人文因素[J].地理研究,2009,28(4):990-1000.
[6] Mc Murry K C.The use of land for recreation[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1930,20(1):7-20.
[7] Magi L, Maharaj B, Fairhurst J. In transition-geography and South Africa at the dawn of the new millennium[J]. South African Geographical Journal,2002,84(1):1-3.
[8] 高雪.天津市土地利用-覆被变化的生态环境效应评价[D].辽宁大连:辽宁师范大学,2012.
[9] 孟爱云,濮励杰,赵翠薇.土地利用规划生态环境影响区域差异研究[J].环境科学研究,2006,19(4):125-131.
[10] 陈文波,肖笃宁,李秀珍.景观空间分析的特征和主要内容[J].生态学报,2002(7):1135-1142.
[11] Jongman R H, Braak C J F T, Tongeren O F R V. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology[M]. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press,1995.
[12] 肖笃宁,李秀珍.当代景观生态学的进展和展望[J].地理科学,1997(4):356-364.
[13] 杨述河,闫海利,郭丽英.北方农牧交错带土地利用变化及其生态环境效应:以陕北榆林市为例[J].地理科学进展,2004(6):49-55.
[14] 董智新,刘新平.新疆土地利用的生态环境效应分析[J].资源开发与市场,2009,25(4):301-303.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01