PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Dong,LI Xiaosai,CHEN Yaheng.Classification Evaluation on Agriculture Ecosystem Service Value of Huailai County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):234-239.

Copy

Classification Evaluation on Agriculture Ecosystem Service Value of Huailai County

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 01 Page number: 234-239 Column: Public date: 2016-02-28

Title:: Classification Evaluation on Agriculture Ecosystem Service Value of Huailai County

Author(s):: ZHANG Dong¹, LI Xiaosai², CHEN Yaheng¹; 1. College of Resources and Environment Science, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China;
2. Institute of Land and Resources, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China

Keywords:: agriculture ecosystem; ecological subclasses; evaluation of ESV; Huailai County

CLC:: F062.2;X171.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The agricultural ecosystem provides products as well as a myriad of indirect ecosystem services. Taking Huailai County, Hebei Province as an example, based on GIS technology, we selected indicators from three aspects of the micro morphology, soil conditions and land use types, and divided the agricultural ecosystem into three ecological classes and six subclasses, then selected seven indicators to build evaluation model from four aspects such as production, regulation, cultural and support services, finally calculated and analyzed ecosystem services values (ESV) for each subclasses respectively. The result showed that the total ESV was 2.253 119 billion yuan, and the descending order were production, cultural, regulation and support services; there were obvious differences of ESV between different kinds of subclasses, where the highest total value was Ⅱ—Ⅱ and the lowest was Ⅰ—Ⅰ; according to different kinds of ESV composition proportion, we divided the six subclasses into two types of production service leading and cultural service leading, and provided the reference for the development of regional agriculture and protecting the environment according to the local conditions.

References:: [1] 孙新章,周海林,谢高地.中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(4):55-60.
[2] 赵荣钦,黄爱民,秦明周,等.农田生态系统服务功能及其评价方法研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2003,19(4):267-270.
[3] 张宏锋,欧阳志云,郑华,等.玛纳斯河流域农田生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(6):1259-1264.
[4] 王俊,李巧云,关欣.常德津市农田生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J].湖南农业科学:上半月,2013(4):76-78.
[5] 元媛,刘金铜,靳占忠.栾城县农田生态系统服务功能正负效应综合评价[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(12):2809-2814.
[6] 王仰麟.景观生态分类的理论方法[J].应用生态学报,1996(S1):121-126.
[7] 李振鹏.乡村景观分类的方法研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004.
[8] 马礼,唐冲.尚义县景观生态分类和生态建设方略[J].地理研究,2008,27(2):266-274.
[9] 李振鹏,刘黎明,谢花林.乡村景观分类的方法探析:以北京市海淀区白家疃村为例[J].资源科学,2005,27(2):167-173.
[10] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being:A framework for assessment[M]. Washington DC:Island Press,2003.
[11] 方精云,柯金虎,唐志尧,等.生物生产力的"4P"概念、估算及其相互关系[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(4):414-419.
[12] 冯凌.土地持续利用与农民福利提升的生态服务价值补偿[M].北京:旅游教育出版社,2011.
[13] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
[14] 赵景柱,肖寒,吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):290-292.
[15] 赵海珍,李文华,马爱进,等.拉萨河谷地区青稞农田生态系统服务功能的评价:以达孜县为例[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(5):632-636.
[16] 蒋小菁.土地利用生态服务价值研究:福建沿海与内陆山区的比较[D].福州:福建师范大学,2009.
[17] Tveit M, Ode ?, Fry G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character[J]. Landscape Research,2006,31(3):229-255.
[18] Fry G, Tveit M S, Ode ?, et al. The ecology of visual landscapes:Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators,2009,9(5):933-947.
[19] 施德群,张玉钧.旅行费用法在游憩价值评估中的应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,9(3):69-74.
[20] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01