[1]LI Yuanyan,AN Yulun,YANG Guangbin.Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Health Based on PSR Model in Karst Areas—A Case Study of Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):279-286.
Copy
Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Health Based on PSR Model in Karst Areas—A Case Study of Guizhou Province
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
22
Number of periods:
2015 06
Page number:
279-286
Column:
Public date:
2015-12-28
- Title:
- Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Health Based on PSR Model in Karst Areas—A Case Study of Guizhou Province
- Keywords:
- ecosystem health; evaluation; PSR; Guizhou Province; karst
- CLC:
- X171.1;X171.4
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Under the background of the ecological reconstruction, the ecological problems become the focus of all walks of life. Owing to the sensitive ecoenvironment of Guizhou Province,the wide rocky desertification distribution and serious soil erosion, the necessity of the objective evaluation of ecological system is becoming more and more increasingly prominent. Taking Guizhou Province as the case study, using the index system method of pressure state response (PSR) model and combining GIS and RS technology, we evaluated ecosystem health of Guizhou in the period from 2000 to 2010 and analyzed the spatial and temporal variation characteristics. The results showed that: (1) the health level of ecological system in Guizhou Province was basically in the Ⅲ and Ⅳ grade; (2) ecosystem health had gotten slightly better in the ten years, mainly changed from the level Ⅲ to the adjacent level, other classes transformed less;(3) at the prefecture-level and city level, the highest average level of ecological health is found in southeast state of Guizhou, the lowest one is found in Bijie City; at the county-level and city level, the ecological condition of Chishui City is the best, and Nanming district is the worst one; (4) the main factors causing the ecosystem health change are population, urbanization, natural factors and industrial ratio. Furthermore, according to the evaluation results, corresponding countermeasures are put forward to protect southeast and strengthen punish northwest, and establish regional grading ecological management system.
- References:
-
[1] 罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,等.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606-1614.
[2] 汪娜,韩永刚,黄义雄,等.福州市建成区生态系统健康评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2014,21(2):200-204.
[3] 赵旭阳,高占国,韩晨霞.基于生态复杂性的湿地生态系统健康评价[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(4):61-67.
[4] 张凤太,苏维词,赵卫权,等.基于生态足迹模型的喀斯特高原山地生态系统健康评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):256-261.
[5] 刘明华,董贵华. RS和GIS支持下的秦皇岛地区生态系统健康评价[J].地理研究,2006,25(5):930-938.
[6] Bartell S M, Lefebvre G, Kaminski G, et al. An ecosystem model for assessing ecological risks in Quebec rivers, lakes, and reservoirs[J]. Ecological Modelling,1999,124(1):43-67.
[7] 杨主泉,张志明.基于PSR模型的桂林市旅游生态安全动态评价[J].福建林业科技,2014,41(1):159-165.
[8] 高占国,朱坚,翁燕波,等.多尺度生态系统健康评价:以宁波市为例[J].生态学报,2010,30(7):1706-1717.
[9] 赵帅,柴立和,李鹏飞,等.城市生态系统健康评价新模型及应用:以天津市为例[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(4):1173-1179.
[10] 李茂娟,李天奇,王欢,等.基于模糊综合评判的长春市生态系统健康评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):254-259.
[11] 胡碧玉,胡昌升,郭郡郡.基于熵权的川北城市生态系统健康综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):158-162.
[12] 杨斌,隋鹏,陈源泉,等.生态系统健康评价研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(21):291-296.
[13] 曹欢,苏维词.基于模糊数学综合评价法的喀斯特生态系统健康评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):148-154.
[14] 曹欢,苏维词.喀斯特生态系统健康评价方法比较研究[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(1):183-187.
[15] 周文龙,赵卫权,苏维词,等.基于子系统的云台山喀斯特生态系统健康评价指标体系初探[J].贵州科学,2013,31(5):93-97.
[16] Waltz R. Development of environmental indicator systems:Experiences from Germany[J].Environmental Management,2000,25(6):613-623..
[17] 徐明德,李静,彭静,等.基于RS和GIS的生态系统健康评价[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(8):1809-1814.
[18] 赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480-488.
[19] 张盼盼,胡远满,肖笃宁,等.一种基于多光谱遥感影像的喀斯特地区裸岩率的计算方法初探[J].遥感技术与应用,2010,25(4):510-514.
[20] 郭文强,安裕伦,刘世曦.基于变异系数法的贵州省石漠化驱动力研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(15):9158-9159.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01