[1]LI Wenzheng.Measure and Analysis on the Regional Differences of Urban Green Development in Shaanxi Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):152-157.
Copy
Measure and Analysis on the Regional Differences of Urban Green Development in Shaanxi Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
22
Number of periods:
2015 05
Page number:
152-157
Column:
Public date:
2015-10-28
- Title:
- Measure and Analysis on the Regional Differences of Urban Green Development in Shaanxi Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
- Keywords:
- Shaanxi Province; urban green development; regional difference; analytic hierarchy process; cluster analysis
- CLC:
- X822
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- We constructed a comprehensive evaluation system for urban green development level from the four aspects: the green level of environmental health and infrastructure, green level of environment carrying potential, green level of economic growth, and green level of environmental treatment. With the methods of analytic hierarchy process and cluster analysis, the synthesized measure and analysis on the urban green development level of 10 prefecture level cities of Shaanxi Province in 2013 were carried out. The results are as follows. (1) There are great differences among cities in terms of the green development level, and the 10 cities can be classified into five types: high level balanced development regions(Ankang, Yan’an and Baoji); medium level balanced development regions(Hanzhong, Shangluo and Yulin); medium level non-balanced development region(Xi’an); low level balanced development regions(Tongchuan and Xianyang); ultra-low level balanced development region(Weinan). (2) In view of the spatial differences, the comprehensive level of southern Shaanxi is generally high; the northern part of northern Shaanxi is medium, and its southern part is high; from the western part of Guanzhong to central and eastern parts, the comprehensive level is decreasing from high to medium and low status. There are deviations of the urban green development level from its economic-society development level in Shaanxi Province. (3) The green level of environment carrying potential and the green level of economic growth are the most important factors affecting the gap of comprehensive level among different cities. The two aspects have great weight, and the score gap among cities is big in the two aspects. The land area, industrial scale and technology level, and economic growth mode are the main factors affecting these two aspects. The results of this research can offer reference for the urban green development plan and decision in Shaanxi Province.
- References:
-
[1] 胡鞍钢,周绍杰.绿色发展:功能界定、机制分析与发展战略[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(1):14-20.
[2] 王玲玲,张艳国."绿色发展"内涵探微[J].社会主义研究,2012,30(5):143-146.
[3] 马洪波.绿色发展的基本内涵及重大意义[J].攀登,2011,30(2):67-70.
[4] United Nations Environment Programme. Towards a Green Economy[R].2011.
[5] 石敏俊,刘艳艳.城市绿色发展:国际比较与问题透视[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(5):140-145.
[6] 王永芹.中国城市绿色发展的路径选择[J].河北经贸大学学报,2014,35(3):51-53.
[7] 郑德凤,臧正,孙才志.绿色经济、绿色发展及绿色转型研究综述[J].生态经济,2015,31(2):64-68.
[8] 北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中心.2012中国绿色发展指数报告[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012.
[9] 耿天召,朱余,王欢.城市绿色发展竞争力评价研究[J].环境监控与预警,2014,6(1):60-62.
[10] 王婉晶,赵荣钦,揣小伟,等.绿色南京城市建设评价指标体系研究[J].地域研究与开发,2012,31(2):62-65.
[11] 汪娜,韩永刚,黄义雄,等.福州市建成区生态系统健康评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(2):200-204.
[12] 官冬杰,苏印,何政春.基于模糊数学模型的城市生态系统健康动态变化评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):150-156.
[13] Rainer W. Competences for green development and leapfrogging in newly industrializing countries[J]. International Economics and Economic Policy,2010,7(2):245-265.
[14] 徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:226-232.
[15] 曾建权.层次分析法在确定企业家评价指标权重中的应用[J].南京理工大学学报,2004,28(1):99-104.
[16] 朱茵,孟志勇,阚叔愚.用层次分析法计算权重[J].北方交通大学学报,1999,23(5):119-122.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01