[1]WU Yifan,LEI Guoping,LU Chang,et al.Evaluation of Urban Land Use Performance Based on the Improved TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Degree in Daqing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):85-90.
Copy
Evaluation of Urban Land Use Performance Based on the Improved TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Degree in Daqing
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
22
Number of periods:
2015 04
Page number:
85-90
Column:
Public date:
2015-08-28
- Title:
- Evaluation of Urban Land Use Performance Based on the Improved TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Degree in Daqing
- CLC:
- F301.24
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Evaluation of urban land use performance and diagnosis of its obstacle degree are the important basis for sustainable land use. We selected Daqing City as the study area. The evaluation index system was built based on land use input level, land use degree, land use benefit, and land use ecological sustainability. The improved TOPSIS model and obstacle degree model were used to assess urban land use performance and diagnose its obstacle indicators of Daqing City from 2001 to 2010. Results showed that,during the period from 2001 to 2010 the level of urban land use performance in Daqing was generally increasing, with the performance index increasing from 0.290 0 to 0.715 4; the urban land use performance experienced low level to good level; the obstacle degree of land use degree and land use ecological sustainability increased by the annual average of 1.91% and 1.38%, respectively, but the obstacle degree of land use benefit and land use input level decreased by the annual average of 2.52% and 0.76%, respectively. The land use degree was found to be the major obstacle degree on affecting future urban land use performance, increasing the land use degree was crucial to the urban land use performance improvement.
- References:
-
[1] Ferguson B K, Friday R. Ecological performance standards for land development[J]. Biological Conservation, 1983,26(3):193-213.
[2] Pauleit S, Duhme F. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000,52(1):1-20.
[3] 周峰,濮励杰,彭补拙.苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3):392-400.
[4] 陈士银,周飞,杨小雄,等.区域土地利用绩效及可持续性评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(5):1-5.
[5] 李佳,雷国平,崔明哲,等.基于三角模型的矿业城市土地利用可持续性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):196-201.
[6] 马国强.城市土地出让制度绩效分析[J].城市开发,2003(7):35-37.
[7] 瞿忠琼,濮励杰.城市土地供给制度绩效评价指标体系研究:以南京市为例[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(1):45-49.
[8] 任奎,周生路,姚俊,等.南京市土地征用制度实施绩效评价研究初探[J].农业技术经济,2008(1):72-78.
[9] 罗栋,张根寿,王海军.基于集约评价的城市土地利用投入与产出分析:以武汉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):153-157.
[10] 韦亚平,赵民,汪劲柏.紧凑城市发展与土地利用绩效的测度:"屠能-阿隆索"模型的扩展与应用[J].城市规划学刊,2008(3):32-40.
[11] 刘红萍.城市用地扩张控制过程的绩效研究[J].统计与决策,2008(10):47-48.
[12] 吴一洲,吴次芳,罗文斌.浙江省县级单元建成区用地绩效评价及其地域差异研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2):330-340.
[13] 吴一洲,吴次芳,罗文斌,等.浙江省城市土地利用绩效的空间格局及其机理研究[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(10):41-46.
[14] 李灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰,等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):217-227.
[15] 潘竟虎,郑凤娟.甘肃省县域土地利用绩效的空间差异测度及其机理研究[J].西北师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,47(1):87-92.
[16] 陈士银,周飞,吴雪彪.基于绩效模型的区域土地利用可持续性评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):249-253.
[17] 张文雅,宋戈.哈尔滨市耕地利用效益特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):79-83.
[18] 胡永宏.对TOPSIS法用于综合评价的改进[J].数学的实践与认识,2002,32(4):572-575.
[19] 邱根胜,邹水木,刘日华.多指标决策TOPSIS法的一种改进[J].南昌航空工业学院学报,2006,19(3):1-3.
[20] 李新举,方玉东,田素锋,等.黄河三角洲垦利县可持续土地利用障碍因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(7):71-75.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01