PDF Download

[1]BI Haiyang,LI Bo,NAN Bo,et al.Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):171-177.

Copy

Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 22 Number of periods: 2015 02 Page number: 171-177 Column: Public date: 2015-04-28

Title:: Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group

Author(s):: BI Haiyang¹, LI Bo¹, NAN Bo¹, MIAO Dan², ZHAO Liqin², LU Shubing¹; 1. College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. College of Geography and Resource Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610000, China

Keywords:: land ecology; land use regulation; land classification; ecological performance evaluation system; Huayang Lake Group

CLC:: F301.22

DOI:: -

Abstract:: This study aims at exploring the methods to regulate the land function and evaluate the ecological performance of major function oriented zones at sub-country scale. Huangyang Lake Group was taken as the study area and the employed methods include remote sensing image interpretation, land use classification, land use transfer matrix and gravity center model. The results showed that: 1) the proportions of land used for ecological purposes, residence and production decreased, stabilized and increased, respectively, in Huayang Lake Group area from 1990 to 2010, the main changes were the conversion of lake to cultivated land, inland tidal flats, reservoir pits and construction land; 2) gravity model showed the sharpened imbalance of the spatial distributions of forestland, grassland and reservoir, and the gradually increased imbalance of the spatial distributions of inland tidal flats, construction land and farmland; 3) the proportions of the ecological land of restricted and optimized development zones met the requirements, the ecological land of prohibited development zone needed to be improved; 4) the proportions of the ecological land of most towns had been decreasing, especially Gaoling and Chengling; 5) the ecological performance evaluation weights of prohibited, restricted, key and optimized development zones were 1, 0.8, 0.3 and 0.2, respectively. In conclusion, the land regulation based on ecological, living and production land classification and ecological performance evaluation system at town levels provided a reference for implementing major function oriented zoning at sub-county scales. However, the implementation of the land function regulation of major function oriented zones requires the coordination of government departments. The indexes and weights of ecological performance evaluation system need further investigations.

References:: [1] 范树平,程久苗,戴支银,等.土地利用分区与主体功能分区协调探讨:以县级为例[J].云南地理环境研究,2010,22(1):76-81.
[2] 樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):340-349.
[3] Zhang Z, Sherman R, Yang Z, et al. Integrating a participatory process with a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for protected area zoning in China[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2013,21(4):225-240.
[4] 王万茂.土地用途管制的实施及其效益的理性分析[J].中国土地科学,1999,13(3):9-12.
[5] 张全景,欧名豪,王万茂.中国土地用途管制制度的耕地保护绩效及其区域差异研究[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(9):8-13.
[6] 周晓飞,雷国平,徐珊.城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断:以哈尔滨市为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):126-130.
[7] Gallent N, Kim K S. Land zoning and local discretion in the Korean planning system[J]. Land Use Policy, 2001,18(3):233-243.
[8] 白燕.主体功能区建设与财政生态补偿研究:以安徽省为例[J].环境科学与管理,2010,35(1):155-158.
[9] 齐晔,蔡琴.可持续发展理论三项进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(4):110-116.
[10] 王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.
[11] 邓红兵,陈春娣,刘昕,等.区域生态用地的概念及分类[J].生态学报2009,29(3):1519-1524.
[12] 董雅文,周雯,周岚,等.城市化地区生态防护研究:以江苏省,南京市为例[J].城市研究,1999,2(2):6-10.
[13] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,41(5):536-540.
[14] 王振健,李如雪.城市生态用地分类,功能及其保护利用研究:以山东聊城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):306-308.
[16] 王世东,慎利,王新闯.基于RS与GIS的生态用地评价:以辽宁省大洼县为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):628-637.
[17] 吕立刚,周生路,周兵兵,等.区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究:以江苏省为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(12):1442-1449.
[18] 张晓平,朱道林,许祖学.西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):185-194.
[19] 王文,王鸿雁.浅议生态政绩考核[J].郧阳师范高等专科学校学报,2012,31(5):97-100.
[20] 国家统计局关于2013年粮食产量的公告[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201311/t20131129_475486.html.
[21] 全国粮油价格监测系统周报[EB/OL], 2013-11-29. http://price.cngrain.net/sinoprice/zhoubao.aspx?Date=2013-9&PriceType=1&PriceTypeName=%b2%fa%c7%f8%b0%f5%b3%d3%ca%d5%b9%ba%bc%db,2014-06-27.
[22] 王重玲,朱志玲,王梅梅,等.基于生态服务价值的宁夏隆德县生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):208-212.
[23] 郑德凤,臧正,孙才志.改进的生态系统服务价值模型及其在生态经济评价中的应用[J].资源科学,2014,36(3):0584-0593.
[24] 岳东霞,杜军,巩杰,等.民勤绿洲农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因子的回归分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2567-2575.
[25] 李双成,黄姣,邵晓梅,等.区域生态补偿与土地生态安全[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(5):39-41.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01