[1]HAN Mu-wen,ZHUANG Zhu-zhou,MA Chao,et al.Evaluation for Benefit in Ecological Shelter Area Based on Ecological Green Equivalent Weight—Example of Shelter Area in Yanchi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):211-217.
Copy
Evaluation for Benefit in Ecological Shelter Area Based on Ecological Green Equivalent Weight—Example of Shelter Area in Yanchi County
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
21
Number of periods:
2014 06
Page number:
211-217
Column:
Public date:
2014-12-28
- Title:
- Evaluation for Benefit in Ecological Shelter Area Based on Ecological Green Equivalent Weight—Example of Shelter Area in Yanchi County
- Keywords:
- ecological benefit; evaluation; green equivalent; ecological environment in shelter area; Yanchi County
- CLC:
- X171.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- The paper evaluates the ecological benefits in ecology shelter based on the research about four ecology shelters in Hua Machi town of Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. SPOT satellite remote sensing image in 2008 and UAV aerial image in 2013 were used to monitor and analyze the change of land application in the research area, then the ecological benefits in the area were evaluated by ecological green equivalent evaluation model. The results showed that the ecological green equivalent weight in research area had increased from 2008 to 2013, which meant that the ecological environment was improved; the ecological green equivalent weight in research area was still less than 1 in 2008 and 2013, which showed the ecological environment in shelter area was relatively weak at present; the forest coverage rate in research area was 20%, less than minimum value of UN standard, and that was higher than the coverage rate (15%) which environment-protection department required ecology county to meet. The forest coverage rate based on green equivalent weight had a large gap behind the best forest coverage rate, which indicated that the land use in the research area need more adjustment. More efforts should be made for ecology protection and restoration. Essential methods such as closing hillsides to facilitate forestation, banning raising livestock on hills, and returning the grain plots to forestry are all supposed to be continued.
- References:
-
[1] 马莉娅,吴斌,张宇清,等.基于生态足迹的宁夏盐池县生态安全评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(5):57-62.
[2] 杨显明,米文宝,齐拓野,等.宁夏生态移民效益评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(4):16-21.
[3] 岳耀杰,闫维娜,王秀红,等.区域生态退耕对生态系统服务价值的影响:以宁夏盐池为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(2):60-68.
[4] 刘军利,秦富仓,岳永杰,等.内蒙古伊金霍洛旗风沙区退耕还林还草生态效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):104-107.
[5] 钟兆站.中国海岸带自然灾害与环境评估[J].地理科学进展,1997,16(1):44-50.
[6] 杜灵通,李国旗.基于SPOT-VGT的宁夏盐池县近8年生态环境动态监测[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(5):46-51.
[7] 夏照华,张克斌,李瑞,等.基于NDVI的农牧交错区植被覆盖度变化研究:以宁夏盐池县为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):178-181.
[8] 国家测绘局.低空数字航空摄影规范[S].CH/Z 3005-2010.
[9] 王重玲,朱志玲,王梅梅,等.基于生态服务价值的宁夏隆德县生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):208-212.
[10] 罗志军,张军.生态绿当量及其在土地利用结构优化中的应用:以江西省新建县为例[J].江西农业大学学报,2007,29(5):851-856.
[11] Jim C Y. Managing urban trees and their soil envelopes in a contiguously developed city environment[J]. Environmental Management,2001,28(6):819-832.
[12] 牛继强,徐丰.基于RS与生态绿当量的土地利用结构优化研究[J].信阳师范学院学报:自然科学版,2009,22(3):410-413.
[13] 毛永文.生态环境影响评价概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003.
[14] 刘艳芳,明冬萍.基于生态绿当量的土地利用结构优化[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2002,27(5):493-498.
[15] 张健,陈林武.最佳防护效益森林覆盖率定量探讨[J].林业科学,1996,32(4):317-324.
[16] 宫渊波,陈林武.四川盆地低山丘陵区县级最佳防护效益森林覆盖率定量研究[J].四川农业大学学报,1996,14(2):231-236.
[17] 胡华科,郑春燕.土地利用变化的环境影响生态绿当量评价:以梅州市为例[J].农业现代化研究,2008,29(6):743-746.
[18] 赵丹,李锋,王如松.基于生态绿当量的城市土地利用结构优化:以宁国市为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):6242-6250.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01