PDF Download

[1]LI Shuang,ZHANG Guo-chen,WANG Li-yan.Analysis and Evaluation on Shijiazhuang City Based on Ecological Footprint and Material Flow[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):226-231.

Copy

Analysis and Evaluation on Shijiazhuang City Based on Ecological Footprint and Material Flow

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 20 Number of periods: 2013 05 Page number: 226-231 Column: Public date: 2013-10-28

Title:: Analysis and Evaluation on Shijiazhuang City Based on Ecological Footprint and Material Flow

Author(s):: LI Shuang¹, ZHANG Guo-chen¹, WANG Li-yan^1,2; 1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China;
2. Environmental Evolution and Ecological Construction Laboratory of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050024, China

Keywords:: ecological footprint; material flow; sustainable development; Shijiazhuang City

CLC:: F127;F205

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Ecological footprint model and material flow analysis were used to analyze and evaluate Shijiazhuang ecological footprint and sustainability metabolic material flow from 2002 to 2011. The results showed that: (1) in the study period, Shijiazhuang City, the per capita ecological footprint overall presented the upward trend, it reached up to 6.964 207 hm²/person in 2011, per capita ecological carrying capacity decreased from 0.251 515 hm²/person to 0.213 777 hm²/person, ecological deficit was significant during this period, and the per capita ecological deficit had reached to 6.750 43 hm²/person in 2011, these showed that use of natural resources in Shijiazhuang City was beyond the scope of ecological carrying capacity, and ecological development was not sustainable; (2) overall direct material input of Shijiazhuang City presented increasing trend from 5.77×10⁸ t in 2002 to 7.54×10⁸ t in 2011, regional resource extraction activities were growing with resource dependencies, and resource development was also more extensive, the hidden region stream (DHF) had become the major source of environmental stress; (3) compared to that in 2002, material productivity (MP) increased by 1.78 times in 2011, the data showed its effectiveness in substance use had improved, but the use efficiency of resource was still low.

References:: [1] Rees W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leave out[J]. Environment and Urbanization,1992,4(2):120-130.
[2] Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers,1996.
[3] 张威,张恒庆.生态足迹方法:辽宁省2005-2007年生态足迹计算与分析[J].环境科学与管理,2010,35(6):150-153.
[4] 尹璇,倪晋仁,毛小苓.生态足迹研究述评[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(5):45-52.
[5] 金丹,卞正富.基于能值的生态足迹模型及其在资源型城市的应用[J].生态学报,2010,30(7):1725-1733.
[6] 柴志敏,刘小英,李富忠,等.2003-2007年山西省生态足迹动态变化分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(3):49-52.
[7] WWF2004:Living Planet Report[EB/OL].http://www.Chinainfo.gov.cn/data/200503,2004-10-10.
[8] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the Ecological Footprint Concept[J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29(3):375-390.
[9] 林锡雄.台湾物质流之建置与应用研究初探[D].台湾:中原大学,2001.
[10] 姚星期.基于物质流核算的浙江省循环经济研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.
[11] Schuetz H, Bringezu S. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounting(MFA):Technical Documentation[R].Germany:Wuppertal Institute,1998.
[12] 张音波,陈新庚,彭晓春,等.广东省环境经济系统的物质流分析[J].环境科学学报,2008,28(5):1021-1031.
[13] 黄和平,毕军,张炳,等.物质流分析研究述评[J].生态学报,2007,27(1):368-379.
[14] 王明星.中国气候与海平面变化及其趋势和影响(三):全球气候变暖[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1996.
[15] 张礼军.基于物质流和生态足迹核算的甘肃省循环经济评价研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2011.
[16] 刘敬智,王青.中国经济的直接物质投入与物质减量分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(1):46-51.
[17] 李兰图,陈文宽,孙丽娜.江苏省土地综合承载力时空差异分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):12-16.
[18] 李佳,雷国平,崔明哲,等.基于三角模型的矿业城市土地利用可持续性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):196-201.
[19] 杨志平.基于生态足迹变化的盐城市麋鹿自然保护区生态补偿定量研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):261-264.
[20] 宫继萍,潘竟虎,石培基.基于生态足迹和灰色关联度的甘肃省可持续发展研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):198-201.
[21] 赵卉卉,王远,谷学明,等.基于物质流和生态足迹的可持续发展指标体系构建:以安徽省铜陵市为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(7):2025-2032.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01