PDF Download

[1]LI Qing-hua,CAO Yang,CHEN Yun-ming,et al.Litter Mass and Carbon Storage in the Pinus tabulaeformis Plantations in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):24-28,54.

Copy

Litter Mass and Carbon Storage in the Pinus tabulaeformis Plantations in Shaanxi Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 20 Number of periods: 2013 04 Page number: 24-28,54 Column: Public date: 2013-08-28

Title:: Litter Mass and Carbon Storage in the Pinus tabulaeformis Plantations in Shaanxi Province

Author(s):: LI Qing-hua¹, CAO Yang^2,3, CHEN Yun-ming^2,3, ZHANG Shuo-xin¹; 1. College of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Keywords:: Pinus tabulaeformis; litter mass; carbon storage; variation

CLC:: S718.5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on Pinus tabulaeformis, the main afforestation tree of north China, the litter amount and carbon storage of Pinus tabulaeformis forests in different biological climate regions of northern Shaanxi, Guanzhong and southern Shaanxi were to surveyed and analyzed. The result showed that after young forest stage, at different developmental stages, the litter carbon rate of pine forest in different biological climate regions presented no obvious rule totally. The performance of litter carbon rate of pine forest in different areas was that the litter carbon content of young forest stage in southern Shaanxi is higher than the northern Shaanxi. The litter carbon rate in other forest age stage also showed no obvious rule. The litter material biomass and carbon stocks in three areas were increasing with increase of stand ages gradually. In different latitudes, the litter material biomass and carbon stocks between middle-aged forest and near mature forest appeared in the order of northern Shaanxi > southern Shaanxi > Guanzhong，and it didn’t show decrease trend with decrease of latitude.

References:: [1] Scott N A, Binkley D. Foliage litter quality and annual net N mineralization:comparison across North American forest sites[J]. Oecologia,1997,111(2):151-159.
[2] 王龙,宋维峰,杨寿荣,等.广西龙脊梯田区森林枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):84-88.
[3] 廖军,王新根.森林凋落量研究概述[J].江西林业科技,2000(1):31-34.
[4] Loranger G, Ponge J F, Imbert D, et al. Leaf decomposition in two semi evergreen tropical forests:influence of little quality[J]. Biology and Fertility Soils,2002,35(4):247-252.
[5] 吴承祯,洪伟,姜志林,等.我国森林凋落物研究进展[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22(3):405-410.
[6] 黄萍,黄春长.全球增温与碳循环[J].陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2000,28(2):104-109.
[7] 杨曾奖,曾杰,徐大平,等.森林枯枝落叶分解及其影响因素[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):649-654.
[8] 李军,田超,杨新兵,等.河北省木兰林管局典型森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):192-196.
[9] 何斌,黄承标,韦家国,等.不同林龄秃杉人工林凋落物储量及其持水特性[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(3):44-46.
[10] 郭瑞红,叶功富,卢昌义,等.不同生长发育阶段木麻黄人工林的凋落物动态[J].海峡科学,2008(10):11-13,18.
[11] 叶海英,赵廷宁,赵陟峰,等.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区几种不同人工水土保持林枯落物储量及持水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):121-125,130.
[12] 徐学华,崔立志,王锡武,等.不同经营措施对冀北山地华北落叶松林枯落物持水性能的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):157-161.
[13] 张大鹏,范少辉,蔡春菊,等.川南退耕丛生竹林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):181-184,189.
[14] Debusk W F, Reddy K R. Litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a phosphorus enriched everglades marsh[J].Biogeochemistry,2005,75:217-240.
[15] Villar C A, de Cabo L, Vaithiyanathan P.Litter decomposition of emergent macrophytes in a floodplain marsh of the lower Parana River[J].Aquatic Botany,2001,70(2):105-116.
[16] Xie Yonghong, Yu Dan, Ren Bo.Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus availability on the decomposition of aquatic plants[J].Aquatic Botany,2004,80(1):29-37.
[17] 侯翠翠,宋长春,李英臣,等.不同水分条件下毛果苔草枯落物分解及营养动态[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):650-658.
[18] 史绮,焦锋,陈莹,等.杭州西湖北里湖荷叶枯落物分解及其对水环境的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(18):5171-5179.
[19] 张林海,曾从盛,张文娟,等.闽江河口湿地枯落物分解及主要影响因子[J].应用生态学报,2012,(9):2404-2410.
[20] 武海涛,吕宪国,杨青,等.三江平原典型湿地枯落物早期分解过程及影响因素[J].生态学报,2007,27(10):4027-4035.
[21] 郑路,卢立华.我国森林地表凋落物现存量及养分特征[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(1):63-69.
[22] 齐泽民,王开运,宋光煜,等.川西亚高山箭竹群落枯枝落叶层生物化学特性[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):1230-1236.
[23] 程堂仁,冯菁,马钦彦,等.甘肃小陇山森林植被碳库及其分配特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(1):33-44.
[24] 封磊,洪伟,吴承祯,等.天然黄山松竞争指标及林分竞争生长模型的研究[J].江西农业大学学报:自然科学版,2002,24(2):251-254.
[25] 张家武,廖利平,李锦芳,等.马尾松火力楠混交林凋落动态及其对土壤养分的影响[J].应用生态学报,1994,18(4):306-313.
[26] 宋日钦,翟明普,贾黎明,等.三倍体毛白杨地上凋落物对林龄的响应[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(3):17-19,22.
[27] 官丽莉,周国逸,张德强,等.鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林凋落物量20年动态研究[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(4):449-456.
[28] 田大伦,宁晓波.不同龄组马尾松林凋落物量及养分归还量研究[J].中南林学院学报,1995,15(2):163-169.
[29] 逯军峰,王辉,曹靖,等.不同林龄油松人工林枯枝落叶层持水性及养分含量[J].浙江林学院学报,2007,24(3):319-325.
[30] 苏勇.福建柏造林实验研究[J].广西林业科学,1991,20(4):187-191.
[31] 王洪岩,王文杰,邱岭,等.兴安落叶松林生物量、地表枯落物量及土壤有机碳储量随林分生长的变化差异[J].生态学报,2012,32(3):833-843.
[32] Schlesinger W H, Hasey M M. Decomposition of chaparral shrub foliage:losses of organic and inorganic constituents from deciduous and evergreenleaves[J]. Ecology,1981,62(3):762-774.
[33] 林波,刘庆,吴彦,等.森林凋落物研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(1):60-64.
[34] 凌华,陈光水,陈志勤.等.中国森林凋落量的影响因素[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2009,4(4):66-71.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01