PDF Download

[1]SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,WANG Zhi-jie,et al.Dynamic Variation of Seedling Bank under Different Erosion Environments in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):1-7,12.

Copy

Dynamic Variation of Seedling Bank under Different Erosion Environments in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau Region

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 20 Number of periods: 2013 04 Page number: 1-7,12 Column: Public date: 2013-08-28

Title:: Dynamic Variation of Seedling Bank under Different Erosion Environments in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau Region

Author(s):: SU Yuan¹, JIAO Ju-ying^2,3, WANG Zhi-jie², DU Hua-dong²; 1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Ministry of Water Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Keywords:: the hilly-gully Loess Plateau; seedling bank; seedling density; species diversity; dynamic variation

CLC:: Q142

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Seedling is an indispensable stage in plant life cycle and important in natural vegetation restoration. To explore dynamic variation of seedling characteristics under different erosion environments(sunny gully slope, sunny Mao slope, Mao top, shady Mao slope, shady gully slope) in the hill-gully Loess Plateau region, five different erosion environments and 15 plots were investigated monthly, and One-Way ANOVA was used to analyze seedling species number, seedling density, species diversity. The results showed that: (1) the number of seedling species decreased from shady gully slope to shady Mao slope, Mao top, sunny Mao slope, sunny gully slope in different erosion environments and seedling species composition existed differences; in different months, seedling species number increased volatility first and then decreased, the maximum appeared in early September; (2) the difference of seedling density in different erosion environments was significant, shady Mao slope was maximum, sunny gully slope was minimum; in different months, seedling density had obvious dynamic variation characteristics of increasing first and then decreasing. Maximum appeared in early July, minimum appeared in early April or middle November; (3) in different erosion environments, seedling species was rich in shady Mao slope, relatively single in sunny gully slope; in different months, diversity index and richness index increased gradually to the peak from April to September, and then reduced slightly in early October and middle November.

References:: [1] 邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):74-77.
[2] 秦伟,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被自然演替系列及其植物物种多样性特征[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(4):507-513.
[3] 王国梁,刘国彬,刘芳,等.黄土沟壑区植被恢复过程中植物群落组成及结构变化[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2550-2557.
[4] 吕仕洪,向悟生,李先琨,等.红壤侵蚀区植被恢复研究综述[J].广西植物,2003,23(1):83-89.
[5] 马祥华,焦菊英.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地自然植被恢复植被特征及其与土壤环境的关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(2):15-22.
[6] 朱显谟.迅速全面恢复植被是根除河害之本[J].中国水土保持,1999(10):29-31.
[7] 郑粉莉.子午岭林区植被破坏与恢复对土壤演变的影响[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):41-44.
[8] 彭少麟.恢复生态学与退化生态系统的恢复[J].中国科学院院刊,2000,20(3):188-192.
[9] 赵丽娅,李锋瑞.围封沙质草甸土壤种子库与幼苗库的特征[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(10):1725-1730.
[10] Hector G S, Escarre J, Sans F X. Factors that limit the emergence and establishment of the related aliens Senecio inaequidens and S.pterophorus and the native S.malacitanus in Mediterranean climate[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,2004,82(9):1346-1355.
[11] 程积民,万惠娥,胡相明.黄土高原草地土壤种子库与草地更新[J].土壤学报,2006,43(4):679-683.
[12] 黄忠良,彭少麟,易俗.影响季风常绿阔叶林幼苗定居的主要因素[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2001,9(2):123-128.
[13] 崔长美,王孝安.黄土高原天然柴松纯林不同坡位幼苗更新特性研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(4):48-52.
[14] 康冰,王得祥,崔宏安,等.秦岭山地油松群落更新特征及影响因子[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(7):1659-1667.
[15] 谢佳彦,邓志平.杭州五云山米槠种群幼苗大小结构及空间分布格局研究[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):35-39.
[16] Tara A, Daniel F. Seedling establishment and life history trade-offs in alpine plants[J]. American Journal of Botany,2004,91(7):1147-1153.
[17] Matthew A, Brian C. Seedling establishment shapes the distribution of shade-adapted forest herbs across a topographical moisture gradient[J]. Journal of Ecology,2009,97(5):1037-1049.
[18] Jia Y F, Jiao J Y, Wang N. Relationship between Seedling and Mature Vegetation on the Hilly-gullied Loess Plateau[C]//2010 international conference on combating land degradation in agricultural areas,Xi’an,China,2010:1-5.
[19] 王宁,贾艳峰,白文娟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地土壤种子库特征与季节变化[J].草业学报,2009,18(3):42-52.
[20] 焦峰,温仲明,王飞,等.黄土丘陵县域尺度整体景观格局分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):167-170.
[21] 张振国,黄建成,焦菊英,等.安塞黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落土壤抗蚀性分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):28-31.
[22] 贾燕锋,焦菊英,张振国,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区沟沿线边缘植被特征初步研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(4):39-43.
[23] 焦菊英,马祥华,白文娟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落与土壤环境因子的对应分析[J].土壤学报,2005,42(5):744-752.
[24] 马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法:Ⅰ.α多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(3):162-168.
[25] 焦菊英,张振国,贾燕锋,等.陕北丘陵沟壑区撂荒地自然恢复植被的组成结构与数量分类[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):2981-2997.
[26] 杨涛,王得祥,周金星,等.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落演替规律及物种多样性动态研究[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(5):10-15.
[27] 朱志诚.黄土高原森林草原的基本特征[J].地理科学,1994,14(2):152-156.
[28] 张瑞,曹华,王云强,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土壤水分空间变异性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):52-57.
[29] 周萍,刘国彬,侯喜禄.黄土丘陵区侵蚀环境不同坡面及坡位土壤理化特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):7-12.
[30] 田媛,李建贵,潘丽萍.梭梭萌生与初期存活的关键影响因素[J].生态学报,2010,30(18):4898-4904.
[31] 王红梅,谢应忠,陈来祥.黄土高原坡地土壤水分动态特征及影响因素[J].宁夏农学院学报,2004,25(4):62-66.
[32] 王凯博,陈美玲,秦娟.子午岭植被自然演替中植物多样性变化及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(10):2089-2096.
[33] 陈宇,焦菊英,王宁,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒地不同侵蚀带土壤种子库特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):1-5.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01