PDF Download

[1]ZHU Yong-ming,ZHAO Li.Study on Relationship between Cultivated Land Quantity and Economic Development in Shijiazhuang City—An Empirical Test Based on Impulse Response Function[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):211-217,225.

Copy

Study on Relationship between Cultivated Land Quantity and Economic Development in Shijiazhuang City—An Empirical Test Based on Impulse Response Function

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 20 Number of periods: 2013 03 Page number: 211-217,225 Column: Public date: 2013-06-28

Title:: Study on Relationship between Cultivated Land Quantity and Economic Development in Shijiazhuang City—An Empirical Test Based on Impulse Response Function

Author(s):: ZHU Yong-ming, ZHAO Li; College of Land and Resources, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071001, China

Keywords:: cultivated land resources; economic development; impulse response function; Shijiazhuang City

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The cultivated land quantity is closely related to economic development. In order to study the relationship between the number of cultivated land resources and economic development, econometric analysis was made on the area of arable land resources, per capita GDP, the secondary industrial value, the tertiary industry value and farmers’ per capita annual net income in the period from 1999 to 2009 in Shijiazhuang City, and the method of the impulse response function and variance decomposition were used for the purpose of coordinating the contradiction of farmland protection and economic development. The result shows that:(1) there exists equilibrium relationship between cultivated land quantity and economic development in the long term; (2) economic development will lead to a reduction in the area of arable land, controlling the amount of cultivated land will inhibit the development of the economy in short term; while the high economy will promote the increase of arable land, and the dependence of economic development on the arable land is weaken in the long term; (3) the variance partition result shows that the contribution rate of the cultivated land quantity to the economic indicators is more significant, especially for the rate of the per capita GDP, secondary industries, and rural per capita net income more than 75% after three periods; while contribution rate of economic indicators to the cultivated land is lower, the percentage of impact of per capita net income of farmers on the quantity of arable land resources is only about 1%. Therefore, in order to promote sustainable socio-economic development, the following measures should be taken to improve economic efficiency, to strengthen the protection of cultivated land, to improve land use intensity and so on.

References:: [1] 曲福田,吴丽梅.经济增长与耕地非农化的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证[J].资源科学,2004,26(5):61-67.
[2] 李兆富,杨桂山.苏州市近50年耕地资源变化过程与经济发展关系研究[J].资源科学,2005,27(4):50-55.
[3] 张景芳,刁承泰,刘贵芬,等.重庆市近十年耕地变化过程及其与经济发展关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):272-274,276.
[4] 纪昌品,欧名豪.湖北省经济发展与耕地资源变化的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(8):693-697.
[5] 胡明,马继东.安塞县土地利用变化与经济发展的关系[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):182-185.
[6] 刘天军,白亚娟.试论经济发展与耕地资源保护[J].生态经济,2005(2):47-50,56.
[7] 郑伟元,戴银萍,肖霖,等.经济发展与土地资源保护:问题、原因及对策[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(4):65-69.
[8] 赵其国,周生路,吴绍华,等.中国耕地资源变化及其可持续利用与保护对策[J].土壤学报,2006,43(4):662-672.
[9] 曲福田,陈江龙,陈雯.农地非农化经济驱动机制的理论分析与实证研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(2):231-241.
[10] 赵永华,何兴元,胡远满,等.岷江上游汶川县耕地变化及驱动力研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(2):94-97.
[11] 赵翠薇,濮励杰,孟爱云.不同经济发展阶段地区耕地变化的对比研究:以广西江州和江苏吴江为例[J].资源科学,2006,28(5):50-56.
[12] 严思齐,吴群.二三产业发展对耕地资源数量的影响及其地域差异:基于中国省级面板数据的考察[J].资源科学,2011,33(10):1948-1954.
[13] 邹平著.金融计量学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005.
[14] 易丹辉.数据分析与EViews应用[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2002.
[15] 李永乐,吴群.中国经济增长与耕地资源数量变化阶段性特征研究:协整分析及Granger因果检验[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(1):33-39.
[16] Engle R F, Granger C W J. Cointegration and error correction:representation, estimation and testing[J]. Econometrica,1987,55(2):251-276.
[17] 高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模:EViews应用及实例[M].2版.北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
[18] 彭水军,包群.中国经济增长与环境污染:基于广义脉冲响应函数法的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(5):15-23.
[19] 史红亮,陈凯.基于脉冲响应函数的中国钢铁产业能源效率及其影响因素的动态分析[J].资源科学,2011,33(5):814-822.
[20] 赵丽,朱永明,付梅臣,等.主成分分析法和熵值法在农村居民点集约利用评价中的比较[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(7):235-242.
[21] 陈利根,龙开胜.耕地资源数量与经济发展关系的计量分析[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(4):4-10.
[22] 叶浩,濮励杰.江苏省耕地面积变化与经济增长的协整性与因果关系分析[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(5):766-774.
[23] 魏建,张广辉.山东省耕地资源与经济增长之间的关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(8):158-163.
[24] 刘荣茂,张莉侠,孟令杰.经济增长与环境质量:来自中国省际面板数据的证据[J].经济地理,2006,26(3):374-377.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01