[1]WANG Rui-fa,XIA Fei,ZHANG Yong-zhan.Study on the Changes of the Cultivated Land and Their Driving Forces in Qingdao City over the Last 10 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):108-114.
Copy
Study on the Changes of the Cultivated Land and Their Driving Forces in Qingdao City over the Last 10 Years
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
20
Number of periods:
2013 02
Page number:
108-114
Column:
Public date:
2013-04-28
- Title:
- Study on the Changes of the Cultivated Land and Their Driving Forces in Qingdao City over the Last 10 Years
- Keywords:
- cultivated land change; driving force; environment-income curve (EIC); grey relationship analysis (GRA); principal component analysis (PCA); multiple regression analysis (MRA); Qingdao City
- CLC:
- F301.24
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Several study methods including land use dynamic index (LUDI) and regional differentiation index (RDI) of the cultivated land, environment-income curve (EIC), economic theory, grey relationship analysis (GRA), principal component analysis (PCA) and multiple regression analysis (MRA) were applied to study the changes of the cultivated lands and their driving forces in Qingdao city during 2000—2009. It was obvious that the rate of changes of the cultivated lands switched from a higher level (LUDI -0.106 during 2000—2003) to a lower one (LUDI 0.014 during 2006—2009). Urbanization, economic construction and industrial structure were the main driving forces during this period. The results also showed that the changes of the cultivated lands in Qingdao city had a remarkable regional differentiation and phasic characteristics. The phase transition of the cultivated lands usually lagged about 1 or 2 years behind the phase transition of the analog industrialization due to the impact of the inertia of economic development. However, the curve of relationship between cultivated land changes and per capita GDP showed an inverted ‘N’ shape, which was different from previous study results. Furthermore, industrial structure and population urbanization were the direct and pervasive influence factors of cultivated land changes respectively.
- References:
-
[1] Pelorosso R, Leone A, Boccia L. Land cover and land use change in the Italian central Apennines: a comparison of assessment methods[J]. Applied Geography,2009,29(1):35-48.
[2] Jansen L J M, Bagnoli M, Focacci M. Analysis of land cover/use change dynamics in Manica Province in Mozambique in a period of transition (1990—2004)[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,254(2):308-326.
[3] 宋开山,刘殿伟,王宗明,等.1954年以来三江平原土地利用变化及驱动力[J].地理学报,2008,63(1):93-104.
[4] 杨东,郑凤娟,窦慧亮,等.干旱内陆河流域土地利用变化的人文驱动因素探究:以甘肃省酒泉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):218-222.
[5] 何丹,刁成泰.重庆江津市土地利用变化及社会驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):24-27.
[6] 李晓文,方精云.近10年来长江下游地区耕地动态变化特征[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(5):562-567.
[7] 马万栋,张渊智,施平,等.海岸带土地利用/土地覆被变化研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(5):87-94.
[8] 青岛市史志办公室.青岛市志·自然地理志/气象志[M].北京:新华出版社,1997.
[9] 青岛市统计局,国家统计局青岛调查队.2010青岛统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[10] 李景刚,欧名豪,张效军,等.耕地资源价值重建及其货币化评价:以青岛市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(11):1870-1880.
[11] 赵京,杨钢桥.耕地利用集约度变化及其驱动因素分析:以湖北省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(1):30-35.
[12] 王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.
[13] 朱会义,李秀彬.关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J].地理学报,2003,58(5):643-650.
[14] 何书金,李秀彬,朱会义,等.环渤海地区耕地变化及动因分析[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(3):345-352.
[15] 韩磊,侯西勇,朱明明,等.20世纪后半叶美国海岸带区域土地利用变化时空特征分析[J].世界地理研究,2010,19(2):42-52.
[16] 刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕,等.灰色系统理论及其应用 [M].5版.北京:科学出版社,2010.
[17] 张超,杨秉赓.计量地理学基础 [M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,1991:106-110.
[18] 山东省统计局,国家统计局山东调查总队.山东统计年鉴2010[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[19] 李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域:土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996,51(6):553-558.
[20] 孙新雷.产业结构演进理论思考[J].上海经济研究,1994(7):47-48.
[21] Syrquin M, Chenery H B. Three decades of industrialization[J]. The Word Bank Economic Reviews,1989,3(2):145-181.
[22] 张颖,赵民.论城市化与经济发展的相关性:对钱纳里研究成果的辨析与延伸[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(4):10-18.
[23] 许德林,欧名豪,肖霖.1997—2008年青岛市农地非农化过程与效果实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(1):9-14.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01