[1]LI Jiao,NIU Jian-zhi.Study on the Soil Water Characteristics of R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis in the West of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):98-101.
Copy
Study on the Soil Water Characteristics of R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis in the West of Beijing
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
20
Number of periods:
2013 01
Page number:
98-101
Column:
Public date:
2013-02-28
- Title:
- Study on the Soil Water Characteristics of R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis in the West of Beijing
- Keywords:
- soil water characteristic curve; R. pseudoacacia; P. orientalis; soil water retention; soil water supply capacity
- CLC:
- S152.7
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to understand the improvement of the soil under the different species plantations and to explore the different types of soil moisture conditions in Xishan area of Beijing, original soil samples were taken under R. pseudoacacia and Platycladus. Soil water characteristic curve was measured by using centrifuge dewatering experiment. Related parameters were obtained by fitting the curve,then soil moisture conditions were analyzed in the R. pseudoacacia forest and P. orientalis forest. Results showed that the soil texture of this area was coarse and plant utilization of water was really difficulty. Generally,the soil in P. orientalis plantation was more sufficient than the R. pseudoacacia in terms of water retention. And each plant species had different improving effect, and water retention of the upper soil was better than that the lower soil layer. In the R. pseudoacacia forest, the upper soil was stronger than the lower soil in terms of water retention. While in the P. orientalis forest, the upper soil was weaker than the lower in terms of water retention.With regard to soil water supply capacity, R. pseudoacacia was intenser than P. orientalis, and the topsoil was intenser than the subsoil under the same site conditions. Both in the R. pseudoacacia and P. orientalis forest, the boundary point of suction for readily available water and resistantly available water was 0.3 MPa.
- References:
-
[1] 吴文强,李吉跃,张志明,等.北京西山地区人工林土壤水分特性的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):51-55.
[2] Gardner W R, Hillel D, Benyamini Y. Post irrigation movement of soil water.Ⅱ:Simultaneous redistribution and evaporation[J]. Water Resolve Research,1970,6(3):851-861.
[3] 李景保,朱翔,蔡炳华,等.洞庭湖区湿地资源可持续利用途径研究[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(3):387-392.
[4] Van Genuehten M Th. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1980,44(5):892-898.
[5] Campell G S. A simple method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from moisture retention data[J]. Soil Science,1974,117(6):311-314.
[6] 来剑斌,王全九.土壤水分特征曲线模型比较分析[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):137-140.
[7] 朱蔚利,肖自幸,牛健植,等.两种模型对土壤水分特征曲线拟合的比较分析[J].湖南农业科学,2011(17):47-51.
[8] 吕殿青,潘云.六道沟流域不同坡位不同土地利用方式下的土壤持水特征研究[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(8):279-282.
[9] 孟秦倩,王健.黄土高原坡面刺槐林土壤水分有效性分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2008,27(4):74-76.
[10] 张光灿,刘霞,贺康宁,等.黄土半干旱区刺槐和侧柏林地土壤水分有效性及生产力分级研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(6):858-862.
[11] 张兴昌,邵明安,黄占斌,等.不同植被对土壤侵蚀和氮素流失的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(6):1038-1044.
[12] 蒋芳市,黄炎和,林金石,等.不同植被恢复措施下红壤强度侵蚀区土壤质量的变化[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2011,40(3):290-295.
[13] 查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993(1):37-43.
[14] 程云,陈宗伟,张洪江,等.重庆缙云山不同植被类型林地土壤水分特征曲线模拟[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):80-83.
[15] 石辉,刘世荣,孙鹏森,等.森林植被对农业生态环境的调控机理评述[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):31-34.
[16] 聂立水,李吉跃,戴伟,等.北京西山油松栓皮栎混交林的土壤水分特征[J].林业科学,2007,43(增刊1):43-47.
[17] 曹扬,赵忠,渠美,等.刺槐根系对深层土壤水分的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(5):765-768.
[18] 李笑吟,毕华兴,张建军,等.晋西黄土区土壤水分有效性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):205-208,211.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01