PDF Download

[1]ZHOU Xuan-de,Zibibula·Simayi,YAN Shan,et al.Study on Urban Competitiveness in the Main Central City of the Southern Xinjiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):264-268.

Copy

Study on Urban Competitiveness in the Main Central City of the Southern Xinjiang

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 06 Page number: 264-268 Column: Public date: 2012-12-20

Title:: Study on Urban Competitiveness in the Main Central City of the Southern Xinjiang

Author(s):: ZHOU Xuan-de¹, Zibibula·Simayi^1,2, YAN Shan¹, Reyihanguli·Wayiti³; 1. College of Recourses and Environmental Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology of Ministry of Education, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
3. School Water Resource and Hgdropower of Xinjing, Urumqi 830013, China

Keywords:: economic structure; urban competitiveness; city size

CLC:: F290

DOI:: -

Abstract:: By building the index system of urban competitiveness, using the coefficient of variation, combining with the weighted sum to determine urban competitiveness score, and analyzing the central city competitiveness in southern Xinjiang, some conclusion was drawn. The change in the city’s economic strength and the competitiveness of the role of government was consist with the change of the city’s comprehensive competitiveness. The change in the scale of urban competitiveness lags was somewhat behind the city’s comprehensive competitiveness. The change of the eco-environmental competitiveness was very different from the change of the city’s comprehensive competitiveness. The competitiveness changes of economic structures and infrastructure were relatively stable. The growth of city’s comprehensive competitiveness score in all the cities varied widely in southern Xinjiang from 2005 to 2010. For example, Korla City, Turpan City, Atushi City, these citys’ comprehensive competitiveness scores showed negative growth, and their growth rates were -0.031 58, -0.027 5 and -0.007 96, respectively. However, the Kashgar city, Aksu city, Hotan city, these cities presented a certain degree of growth and their growth rates were, 0.203 34, 0.028 163 and 0.128 59, respectively.

References:: [1] 高志刚.基于组合评价的中国区域竞争力分类研究[J].经济问题探索,2006(1):28-32.
[2] 王桂新,沈建法.中国地级以上城市综合竞争力研究[J].复旦大学学报:社会科学版,2002(3):69-77.
[3] 周玄德,孜比布拉·司马义.吐鲁番市城市化与生态环境动态分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):159-163.
[4] 徐宏,李明.试论区域竞争力评价指标体系的构建[J].特区经济,2005(5):322-323.
[5] 张京祥,朱喜钢,刘荣增.城市竞争力、城市经营与城市规划[J].城市规划,2002(8):19-22.
[6] 叶依广,周蕾.长江三角洲各城市综合实力的主成分分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(3):197-202.
[7] 苏力叶·木沙江,孜比布拉·司马义,周玄德.吐鲁番地区经济增长与环境质量水平的计量模型研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):55-60.
[8] 姚士谋,陈振光,朱英明,等.中国城市群[M].北京:中国科学技术大学出版社,2006.
[9] 李仁安,申家峰.中部地区城市群城市竞争力评价研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,29(8):162-166.
[10] 申家峰.城市群竞争力理论研究与实证分析[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2007.
[11] 杨木,奚砚涛,李高金.徐州市生态环境—社会经济系统耦合态势分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):137-141.
[12] 卢锦标.珠三角城市群竞争力发展研究:兼论与长三角城市群竞争力的比较[D].广州:暨南大学,2008.
[13] 胡建绩,张锦.基于产业发展的主导产业选择研究[J].产业经济研究,2009(4):38-43.
[14] 陈菁.基于图谱分析的福建省生态环境与城市化耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):163-168.
[15] 倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力理论研究与实证分析[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2003.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01