PDF Download

[1]YU Fa-zhan,CHEN Long-qian,SHEN Zheng-ping,et al.Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability of Typicality Forest of Low Mountains and Hills in Northern Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):188-192.

Copy

Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability of Typicality Forest of Low Mountains and Hills in Northern Jiangsu Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 06 Page number: 188-192 Column: Public date: 2012-12-20

Title:: Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability of Typicality Forest of Low Mountains and Hills in Northern Jiangsu Province

Author(s):: YU Fa-zhan^1,2, CHEN Long-qian¹, SHEN Zheng-ping², QIU Fang-dao²; 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China;
2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China

Keywords:: low mountains and hills in northern Jiangsu; forest vegetation; forest community; ecological vulnerability

CLC:: S718.5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Assessment of ecological vulnerability is a hot issue in the research field of global change and sustainable development. North Jiangsu Province area of low mountains and hills in typical forest vegetation was selected as the study site. Assessment index system was set up for typical forest ecosystem vulnerability of north Jiangsu Province of low mountains and hills by means of AHP, ecological vulnerability evaluation standard was developed, and according to the ecological fragile, the forest was divided into 5 different vulnerability levels. Finally, the ecological frangibility of typical forest communities was evaluated by the weighted comprehensive law. The results showed that typical forest ecological vulnerability of low mountain and hill area was in the sequence of Orientalis community (75.92)>Sawtooth Oak(54.95)>Quercus variabilis(53.61)>Black pine(49.63)>Robinia(47.68)>Pistacia(45.69)>Dalbergia(44.92)>Red pine(43.34).

References:: [1] 蔡海生,赵小敏,陈美球.脆弱生态环境脆弱度评价研究进展[J].江西农业大学学报,2003,25(2):270-275.
[2] 赵红兵.生态脆弱性评价研究[D].济南:山东大学,2007.
[3] 蔡海生,张学玲,周丙娟.生态环境脆弱性动态评价的理论与方法[J].中国水土保持,2009(2):18-22.
[4] 戴亚南,彭检贵.江苏海岸带生态环境脆弱性及其评价体系构建[J].海洋学研究,2009,27(1):78-82.
[5] 孙道玮,陈田,姜野.山岳型旅游风景区生态脆弱性评价方法研究[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版,2005,37(4):131-135.
[6] 常学礼,赵爱芬,李胜功.生态脆弱带的尺度与等级特征[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(2):102-108.
[7] 赵跃龙.中国脆弱生态环境类型分布及其综合整治[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999:1-106.
[8] 钟诚,何宗宜,刘淑珍.西藏生态环境稳定性评价研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(5):573-578.
[9] 魏琦.北方农牧交错带生态脆弱性评价与生态治理研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2010.
[10] 戴全厚,刘国彬,刘明义,等.小流域生态经济系统可持续发展评价:以东北低山丘陵区黑牛河小流域为例[J].地理学报,2005,60(2):209-218.
[11] 张秋根,王桃云,钟全林.森林生态环境健康评价初探[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(5):16-18.
[12] 朱茵,孟志勇,阚叔愚.用层次分析法计算权重[J].北方交通大学学报,1999,23(5):119-122.
[13] 郭鹏,郑唯唯.AHP应用的一些改进[J].系统工程,1995,13(1):28-31.
[14] 于法展,尤海梅,李保杰,等.苏北地区代表性森林土壤理化特性的比较研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2007,23(2):87-90.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01