PDF Download

[1]HOU Lan-gong,XIAO Hong-lang.Study on Evapotranspiration Coefficient of Grassland during the Growing Season in the Ejina Oasis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):126-129.

Copy

Study on Evapotranspiration Coefficient of Grassland during the Growing Season in the Ejina Oasis

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 05 Page number: 126-129 Column: Public date: 2012-10-20

Title:: Study on Evapotranspiration Coefficient of Grassland during the Growing Season in the Ejina Oasis

Author(s):: HOU Lan-gong¹, XIAO Hong-lang²; 1. College of Geographic Information and Tourism, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou, Anhui 239000, China;
2. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Keywords:: Ejina oasis; the growing season; evapotranspiration coefficient; evapotranspiration

CLC:: S718.5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: According to works of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, evapotranspiration coefficient is essential parameter to calculate actual evapotranspiration. Based on the definition of evapotranspiration coefficient and successive observation, evapotranspiration(ETc) of grassland in the Ejina oasis of northwest China was estimated by application of Bowen ration-energy balance method(BREB), and reference evapotranspiraiton was calculated by using FAO 56 Penman-Monteith model during the growing season in 2005. Then, according to the definition, the evapotranspiration coefficient of grassland was given in the Ejina oasis. During the growing season, total ETc was 446.96 mm. From the beginning of growing season, the ETc increased gradually, and reached its maximum value of 6.724 mm/d in the last fifteen days of June. Hereafter the ETc dropped rapidly, and reached its minimum value of 1.215 mm/d at the end of growing season. The variation pattern of crop coefficient(K_c) was similar to that of ETc. From the beginning of growing season, the K_c value increased rapidly, and reached its maximum value of 0.623 in the last fifteen days of June. Afterward, with slowing growth of grassland, the value dropped rapidly at the end of growing season. The evapotranspiration coefficient is helpful to estimate accurately ecological water demand of grassland in the Ejina oasis.

References:: [1] 韦东山, 张秋良, 王立明, 等.额济纳地区草地可持续经营策略[J].内蒙古科技与经济, 2003(5):26-28.
[2] 肖洪浪, 程国栋.黑河流域水问题与水管理的初步研究[J].中国沙漠, 2006, 26(1):1-5.
[3] 周茂先, 肖洪浪, 罗芳, 等.额济纳三角洲地下水盐特征与植被生长的相关研究[J].中国沙漠, 2004, 24(4):431-436.
[4] 李佳陶, 余伟莅, 李钢铁, 等.不同地下水位胡杨蒸腾速率与叶水势的变化分析[J].内蒙古林业科技, 2006(1):1-4.
[5] Fritschen L J. Evapotranspiration rates of field crops determined by the Bowen ratio method[J]. Agron. J., 1966, 58(3):339-342.
[6] Malek E, Bingham G E, McCurdy G D. Evapotranspiration from the margin and moist playa of a closed desert valley[J]. J. Hydrol., 1990, 120(1/4): 15-34.
[7] Wight J R, Hanson C L, Wright J L. Comparing Bowen ratio-energy balance systems for measuring ET[C]//Allen R G, Van Bavel C M U. Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Integrated Perspectives. New York: Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1993.
[8] Cargnel M D, Orchansky A L, Brevedan R E, et al. Evaptranspiration measurements over a soybean crop[C]//Camp C R, Sadler E J, Yoder R E. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the International Conference, San Antonio:Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI, 1996.
[9] Malek E, Bingham G E. Growing season evapotranspiration and crop coefficient[C]//Allen R G, Van Bavel C M U. Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Integrated Perspectives. New York:Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1993.
[10] Grant D A, Meinzer F C. Regulation of transpiration in field-grown sugarcane: evaluation of the stomatal response to humidity with the Bowen ratio technique[J]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1991, 53(3):169-183.
[11] Malek E, Bingham G E, McCurdy G D. Continuous measurement of aerodynamic and alfalfa canopy resistances using the Bowen ratio-energy balance and Penman-Monteith methods[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1992, 59(1/2):187-194.
[12] Alves I, Perrier A, Pereira L S. Penman-Monteith equation: how good is the ‘big leaf’[C]//Camp C R, Sadler E J, Yoder R E. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the International Conference, San Antonio: Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph MI, 1996.
[13] Ortega-Farias S O, Cuenca R H, English M. Hourly reference evapotranspiration by Bowen ratio and Penman methods[C]//Allen R G, Van Bavel C M U. Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Integrated Perspectives. New York: Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 1993.
[14] Farahani H J, Bausch W C. Performance of evapotranspiration models for maize-bare soil to closed canopy[J]. Trans. ASAE, 1995, 38(4):1049-1059.
[15] Todd R W, Klocke N L, Arkebauer T J. Latent heat fluxes from a developing canopy partitioned by energy balance-combination models[C]//Camp C R, Sadler E J, Yoder R E. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the International Conference. San Antonio:Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph MI, 1996.
[16] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. FAO 56 Penman-Monteith model. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, 1998.
[17] Walter I A, Allen R G, Elliott R, et al. ASCE’s Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation[C]//Proceedings of the 4th National Irrigation Symposium, 2000.
[18] Temesgen B, Eching S, Davidoff B, et al. Comparison of some reference evapotranspiration equations for California[J]. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE, 2005, 131(1):73-84.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01